Abstract:Bell's theorem supposedly demonstrates an irreconcilable conflict between quantum mechanics and local, realistic hidden variable theories. In this paper we show that all experiments that aim to prove Bell's theorem do not actually achieve this goal. Our conclusions are based on a straightforward statistical analysis of the outcomes of these experiments. The key tool in our study is probability theory and, in particular, the concept of sample space for the dichotomic random variables that quantifies the outcomes of such experiments. We also show that an experimental proof of Bell's theorem is not, in principle, impossible, but it would require a completely different experimental apparatus than those commonly used to allegedly achieve this objective. The main consequence of our work is that we cannot dismiss local realistic hidden variable theories on the basis of currently available experimental data.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the validity of Bell's theorem and its verification in experiments. Specifically: 1. **Questioning the Validity of Standard Bell Experiments**: - The paper points out that all experiments aiming to prove Bell's theorem have actually failed to achieve their goals. The reason why these experiments failed to achieve their goals is not the imperfection of the experimental apparatus or the existence of unresolved loopholes, but because the experimental results cannot be directly used to prove Bell's theorem. - By using the concepts of probability theory and sample space, the author analyzes in detail the results of standard Bell experiments and points out that these experimental results cannot correspond to the random variables required in Bell's theorem. 2. **Redefining Experimental Requirements**: - The author further proposes that to truly verify Bell's theorem, a completely different experimental apparatus is required. The existing experimental apparatuses cannot meet this requirement. - This conclusion means that, based on the currently available experimental data, we cannot rule out the local - realistic hidden - variable theory. 3. **Mathematical and Physical Background**: - The paper first reviews the basic concepts of quantum mechanics, especially the entangled state between two subsystems and its measurement. - Then, the author calculates in detail the single and joint probability distributions and uses these distributions to calculate the correlation functions. 4. **Key Results**: - First Main Result: Standard Bell experiments have failed to verify Bell's theorem because their results cannot be mapped to the random variables required by Bell's theorem. - Second Main Result: In principle, experiments can be designed to verify Bell's theorem, but a new type of experimental apparatus that has not yet been realized is required. 5. **Discussion**: - The paper emphasizes that the proof of Bell's theorem assumes counterfactual reasoning, that is, it is assumed that multiple incompatible observables can be measured simultaneously on the same pair of entangled photons. This assumption is not feasible in actual experiments. - Therefore, the existing experimental results cannot be used to deny the local - realistic hidden - variable theory. In conclusion, through a detailed statistical analysis of standard Bell experiments, this paper raises doubts about the validity of Bell's theorem and points out a new direction for future experimental design.

Against Bell's Theorem

A possible statistics loophole in Bell's theorem

Non-local Hidden Variable Theories and Bell's Inequality

Logical Inconsistencies in Proofs of the Theorem of Bell

Test of the physical significance of Bell nonlocality

Bell's Theorem Begs the Question

Bell's theorem tells us NOT what quantum mechanics IS, but what quantum mechanics IS NOT

Non-Viability of a Counter-Argument to Bell's Theorem

The Local Account of Bell Nonlocality

Loophole-free Bell inequality violations cannot disprove local realism

Review of Nelson's analysis of Bell's theorem

Logical difficulty from combining counterfactuals in the GHZ-Bell theorems

After Bell

On Removing the Classical-Quantum Boundary

Violation of Local Realism with Freedom of Choice.

Quantum non-locality - It ain't necessarily so...

Bell’s theorem without inequalities

Disproof of Bell's Theorem by Clifford Algebra Valued Local Variables

Counterfactual restrictions and Bell's theorem

An inconsistency in the CHSH inequality

Bell vs Bell: a ding-dong battle over quantum incompleteness