Abstract:Bell’s inequality is derived by resorting to a hidden-variable theory devised for resolving the Einstein-Bohr debate on the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. The legitimacy of quantum superposition for describing the physical world is the essence of the debate. Einstein argued against the legitimacy of quantum superposition. Testing Bell’s inequality by experiments with the experimental results explained by Bell’s theorem opened the door to so-called quantum information technologies. In quantum information theory, “quantum bit” (or “qubit” for short) in a form of quantum superposition is supposed to represent quantum information. In the present paper, a new principle, the general principle of measurements, is introduced and proved as a mathematical theorem. Based on this principle, the experiments for testing Bell’s inequality and so-called experimental evidence for physically realizable “qubit” are scrutinized. The findings are as follows. Although most physicists believe that Einstein’s vision of the physical world contradicts the experimental results of testing Bell’s inequality, actually Einstein’s viewpoint is irrelevant to Bell’s theorem. Bell’s inequality failed to capture the essence of the Einstein-Bohr debate. The experimental results of testing Bell’s inequality and the measurement outcomes of various experiments involving “qubit” are all erroneously explained. Without involving hidden variables, quantum mechanics can be completed based on the general principle of measurements by using disjunction (“or”) as the logical relation between the orthonormal vectors that span an arbitrarily given Hilbert space, and the mathematical setting can remain essentially unchanged. All kinds of “qubit” violate the general principle of measurements and can only describe imaginary objects that do not exist in the real world. A very regrettable conclusion from the above findings is inevitable: Quantum information has no physical carriers, and all quantum information technologies are not physically realizable.

Logical difficulty from combining counterfactuals in the GHZ-Bell theorems

The GHSZ argument: a gedankenexperiment requiring more denken

Logical Inconsistencies in Proofs of the Theorem of Bell

Against Bell's Theorem

An inconsistency in the CHSH inequality

Non-local Hidden Variable Theories and Bell's Inequality

Incompatible Multiple Consistent Sets of Histories and Measures of Quantumness

Consistent quantum counterfactuals

On Purported Physical Realizations of So-called Quantum Information Technologies

Bell's Theorem Begs the Question

Counterfactual restrictions and Bell's theorem

Comment on ``Consistent Sets Yield Contrary Inferences in Quantum Theory''

A no-go theorem for sequential and retro-causal hidden-variable theories based on computational complexity

The Local Account of Bell Nonlocality

Mathematically Proving Bell Nonlocality Motivated by the GHZ Argument

A possible statistics loophole in Bell's theorem

Counterfactual Reasoning, Realism and Quantum Mechanics: Much Ado About Nothing?

Can quantum theory be underpinned by a non-local hidden variable theory ?

A local hidden-variable model for experimental tests of the GHZ puzzle

Non-Viability of a Counter-Argument to Bell's Theorem

Does Quantum Mechanics Require "Conspiracy"?