Abstract:The CHSH inequality is an inequality used to test locality in quantum theory and is recognized as one of Bell's inequalities. In contrast, the KCBS inequality is employed to test noncontextuality in quantum theory. While certain quantum states are known to violate these inequalities individually, it was previously assumed that no state could violate both inequalities simultaneously. This assumption is encapsulated in the concept of the `monogamy relation.' It describes a trade-off between nonlocality and contextuality: the violation of one inequality typically excludes the possibility of violating the other. However, Xue et al. demonstrated that simultaneous violations of both the CHSH and KCBS inequalities are possible with specific choices of observables. This discovery challenges the universal validity of the monogamy relation. It also suggests that the relationship between contextuality and nonlocality is more complex than previously understood. They further showed that numerous scenarios exist where both the CHSH inequality and a contextuality inequality involving more than five observables are violated. However, the number of such scenarios is finite. Building on this, we present two main results. The first is that there are infinitely many scenarios in which both the CHSH inequality and a contextuality inequality involving an odd number of observables are violated. This finding reveals the existence of infinitely many scenarios where the monogamy relation between the CHSH inequality and the noncontextuality inequality no longer holds. The second is that certain quantum states violate both the KCBS inequality and a nonlocality inequality distinct from the CHSH inequality. These insights deepen our understanding of the complex relationship between nonlocality and contextuality, and open avenues for exploring state-dependent inequalities and their physical implications.

Contextuality or nonlocality; what would John Bell choose today?

Kupczynski's Contextual Locally Causal Probabilistic Models are constrained by Bell's theorem

Contextuality-by-Default description of Bell tests: Contextuality as the rule not as an exception

States Violating Both Locality and Noncontextuality Inequalities in Quantum Theory

Quantum non-locality - It ain't necessarily so...

Quantum Nonlocality: How Does Nature Do It?

Kolmogorovian Censorship, Predictive Incompleteness, and the locality loophole in Bell experiments

Generalized Bell scenarios: disturbing consequences on local-hidden-variable models

Corrected Bell and Noncontextuality Inequalities for Realistic Experiments

Violation of Local Realism with Freedom of Choice.

Corrected Bell and non-contextuality inequalities for realistic experiments

Optimal and tight Bell inequalities for state-independent contextuality sets

The Local Account of Bell Nonlocality

Non-local Hidden Variable Theories and Bell's Inequality

Quantum Measurements and Contextuality

Counterfactual restrictions and Bell's theorem

Bell's nonlocality in a general nonsignaling case: quantitatively and conceptually

Quantifying and Interpreting Connection Strength in Macro- and Microscopic Systems: Lessons from Bell’s Approach

Comparing the cost of violating causal assumptions in Bell experiments: locality, free choice and arrow-of-time

Unified approach to contextuality, non-locality, and temporal correlations