History of the NeoClassical Interpretation of Quantum and Relativistic Physics

Shiva Meucci

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.01846

2018-03-30

Abstract:The need for revolution in modern physics is a well known and often broached subject, however, the precision and success of current models narrows the possible changes to such a great degree that there appears to be no major change possible. We provide herein, the first step toward a possible solution to this paradox via reinterpretation of the conceptual-theoretical framework while still preserving the modern art and tools in an unaltered form. This redivision of concepts and redistribution of the data can revolutionize expectations of new experimental outcomes. This major change within finely tuned constraints is made possible by the fact that numerous mathematically equivalent theories were direct precursors to, and contemporaneous with, the modern interpretations. In this first of a series of papers, historical investigation of the conceptual lineage of modern theory reveals points of exacting overlap in physical theories which, while now considered cross discipline, originally split from a common source and can be reintegrated as a singular science again. This revival of an older associative hierarchy, combined with modern insights, can open new avenues for investigation. This reintegration of cross-disciplinary theories and tools is defined as the Neoclassical Interpretation.

History and Philosophy of Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is that in modern physics, although the current models are highly accurate and successful, there seems to be no room for significant change. The author proposes a method to resolve this paradox by reinterpreting the concept - theoretical framework while keeping modern techniques and tools unchanged. This way of re - dividing concepts and re - allocating data can produce revolutionary expected changes for new experimental results without destroying the existing theoretical system. The paper emphasizes that multiple mathematically equivalent theories existed before or simultaneously with modern interpretations, and these theories can serve as the basis for reintegrating interdisciplinary theories, thus opening up new avenues for research. This method is called "neoclassical interpretation".

In short, the core problem of the paper is to explore how, on the basis of not destroying the achievements of modern physics, new perspectives and possibilities can be provided for the development of physics through the reinterpretation and integration of historical theories. This involves the exploration of the blurred boundaries between classical and modern physics, as well as the review of the parallel development histories of fluid dynamics, electromagnetism, relativity and other fields, aiming to reveal the deep - seated connections between these fields and provide a new methodology for future research.