Mobile Modernity: Germans, Jews, Trains (review)
D. Lorenz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/MON.2008.0008
2008-01-03
Abstract:I want to conclude with a more general observation. Much of the energy in Elsaghe’s work is derived from a particular perception of Mann’s work, or rather of the role of Thomas Mann in Germany today—his “Rolle [. . .] in der deutschen Selbstvergewisserung” (9). Elsaghe appears to believe that German Mann scholarship tends to shield its protagonist from criticism, from an honest interrogation of his historical legacy, because as a “Weltbürger,” even as a kind of secular saint, Mann is needed for the cultural and moral validation of the Berlin Republic. This seems to me to be a peculiarly non-German view of the matter. In Germany itself since 1945, and even before, the predominant view of Mann was and is that of a bitter and unjustly severe critic of Germany whose own contribution to German culture, especially to political culture, has been negligible, if not downright harmful, and in any case is still unwelcome. This observation, which can easily be verifi ed from the German literature on Mann, should give pause to Elsaghe and perhaps take some of the wind out of his sails.
History