Werner Heisenberg (1901-1976)

Ivan Todorov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/0503235
2005-04-25
Abstract:A brief review of Heisenberg's life and work: participating in the youth movement in the aftermath of World War I, creating quantum mechanics, conflict with "deutsche Physik", involvement in "Hitler's Uranium Project", last illusions. Problems and dilemmas for scientists under a dictatorship - East and West.
History and Philosophy of Physics,Mathematical Physics,Physics and Society,Quantum Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problems that this paper attempts to explore and solve are mainly about the moral and professional dilemmas of scientists under a dictatorship regime, especially taking Heisenberg as an example. Specifically: 1. **Moral issues of scientists during the Nazi period**: The article elaborately describes Heisenberg's behaviors and choices during the Nazi Germany period, including his participation in Hitler's uranium project and his interactions with other scientists. Through these descriptions, the author provokes readers to think about how scientists should balance their personal career pursuits and moral responsibilities in an extreme political environment. 2. **The relationship between science and politics**: The article explores how scientists can maintain the independence and objectivity of science under political pressure. For example, when facing the "German Physics" movement, how Heisenberg defended the status of modern physics (such as the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics), and published an article in the party newspaper "Völkischer Beobachter" to support the continued research on these theories. 3. **The dilemma of scientists under a dictatorship regime**: The article is not limited to discussing the situation in Germany, but also extends to a broader context, that is, the common dilemma of scientists in the East and the West under a dictatorship regime. By analyzing Heisenberg's experiences, the author raises a universal question: when scientists are faced with political oppression, how should they respond? Should they openly rebel, or should they seek solutions within the system? 4. **Historical evaluation and controversy**: The article also mentions the historical controversy over Heisenberg's behaviors, especially the specific situation of his meeting with Bohr in occupied Copenhagen. These controversies reflect different interpretations of the same event from different historical perspectives, further deepening the understanding of the complex situations faced by scientists in special historical periods. In conclusion, the core issue of this paper is to explore the roles, responsibilities of scientists under a dictatorship regime and their difficult choices between morality and profession.