On Einstein's opponents, and other crackpots

Jeroen van Dongen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1111.2181

2011-11-09

History and Philosophy of Physics

Abstract:Essay Review of "Einsteins Gegner. Die \"offentliche Kontroverse um die Relativit\"atstheorie in den 1920er Jahren" by Milena Wazeck.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Tension in Einstein's Philosophical Thinking

Tong-fang LIU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-2815.2007.02.022

2007-01-01

Abstract:The philosophy of Einstein is a harmonious symbiotic entity composed of pluralistic philosophy.Einstein had tried his best to make opposing philosophical thoughts to confine yet complement each other and keep necessary tension.These philosophical thoughts are metaphysical materialism and dialectical idealism in ontology,ontological realism and theoretical realism in realism,conventionalism and holism in methodology as well as logical thinking and intuitional thinking in mode of thinking.
The Epistemic Virtues of the Virtuous Theorist: On Albert Einstein and His Autobiography

Jeroen van Dongen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2002.01301

2020-02-04

History and Philosophy of Physics

Abstract:Albert Einstein's practice in physics and his philosophical positions gradually reoriented themselves from more empiricist towards rationalist viewpoints. This change accompanied his turn towards unified field theory and different presentations of himself, eventually leading to his highly programmatic Autobiographical Notes in 1949. Einstein enlisted his own history and professional stature to mold an ideal of a theoretical physicist who represented particular epistemic virtues and moral qualities. These in turn reflected the theoretical ideas of his strongly mathematical unification program and professed Spinozist beliefs.
Einstein the Stubborn: Correspondence between Einstein and Levi-Civita

Galina Weinstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1202.4305

2012-02-20

Abstract:Before developing his 1915 General Theory of Relativity, Einstein held the "Entwurf" theory. Tullio Levi-Civita from Padua, one of the founders of tensor calculus, objected to a major problematic element in this theory, which reflected its global problem: its field equations were restricted to an adapted coordinate system. Einstein proved that his gravitational tensor was a covariant tensor for adapted coordinate systems. In an exchange of letters and postcards that began in March 1915 and ended in May 1915, Levi-Civita presented his objections to Einstein's above proof. Einstein tried to find ways to save his proof, and found it hard to give it up. Finally Levi-Civita convinced Einstein about a fault in his arguments. However, only in spring 1916, long after Einstein had abandoned the 1914 theory, did he finally understand the main problem with his 1914 gravitational tensor. In autumn 1915 the Göttingen brilliant mathematician David Hilbert found the central flaw in Einstein's 1914 derivation. On March 30, 1916, Einstein sent to Hilbert a letter admitting, "The error you found in my paper of 1914 has now become completely clear to me".

History and Philosophy of Physics
Review of Berger and DiRuggiero, "Einstein: The Man and His Mind"

Galina Weinstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.02724

2023-02-06

Abstract:In this paper, I review the book: Gary S. Berger, Michael DiRuggiero. "Einstein: The Man and His Mind." Bologna: Damiani, 2022. Illustrations. 209 pp. $70.00, cloth, ISBN 978-88-6208-784-1.

History and Philosophy of Physics
Einstein Against Singularities: Analysis versus Geometry

John D. Norton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31389/pop.91

2024-08-06

Abstract:Einstein identified singularities in spacetimes, such as at the Schwarzschild radius, where later relativists only find a coordinate system assigning multiple values to a single spacetime event. These differing judgments derive from differences in mathematical methods. Later relativists employ geometrical structures to correct anomalies in the coordinate systems used in analytic expressions. Einstein took the analytic expressions to be primary and the geometrical structures as mere heuristics that could be overruled if physical assumptions required it. Einstein's non-geometric methods had a firm base in the history of mathematical methods. They continued the non-geometric orientation of Christoffel, Ricci and LeviCivita. Einstein's insistence that singularities must be eliminated marked a departure from earlier tolerance of singularities. It was founded upon his longterm project of eliminating arbitrariness from fundamental physical theories. However, Einstein was willing to theorize with singularities only temporarily if they were the least arbitrary approach then available.

History and Philosophy of Physics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Historical and Philosophical Aspects of the Einstein World

Cormac O'Raifeartaigh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.08678

2019-06-20

Abstract:This article presents a brief review of some historical and philosophical aspects of Einstein's 1917 paper 'Cosmological Considerations in the General Theory of Relativity', a landmark work that denoted the starting point of modern theoretical cosmology. Our presentation includes a discussion of Einstein's early views of issues such as the relativity of inertia, the curvature of space and the cosmological constant. Particular attention is paid to lesser-known aspects of Einstein's paper such as his failure to test his model against observation, his failure to consider the stability of the model and a slight mathematical confusion concerning the introduction of the cosmological constant term. Taken in conjunction with his later cosmological works, we find that Einstein's approach to cosmology was characterized by a pragmatic search for the simplest model of the universe that was consistent with the principles of relativity and with contemporaneous astronomical observation.

History and Philosophy of Physics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Einstein, Sciascia, Majorana, Amaldi, e il Rapporto tra Intellettuali e Potere (Einstein, Sciascia, Majorana, Amaldi, and the Relationship of Intellectuals with the Power)

Erasmo Umberto M. Recami,Umberto Victor G. Recami,Erasmo Recami

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0709.4672

2007-10-14

Abstract:In Europe (e.g., in Italy), and in the States, the opinion is widely spreading that the negative consequences of modern progress are the fault of "Science". A lively debate on this topic took place among the famous writer Leonardo Sciascia and Italian physicists like Edoardo Amaldi and Emilio Segre', when Sciascia wrote his known book about the disappearance of Ettore Majorana, a book that presented Majorana (a very reserved theoretical physicist) as an example of the scientist that keeps his discoveries secret when afraid of possible evil applications. We wish to contribute now to such a question, since many special meetings did recently return to it, while celebrating the centenary of Majorana's birth (2006), or 30 years (2005) from Sciascia's book publication. It appeared natural to us to start with the figure of Einstein, who, even if extremely peaceable, supported the atomic bomb construction by his letter to Roosvelt. We discuss first the significance of part of Einsteins's scientific work (which flourished in particular one century ago): We seize this opportunity for presenting a derivation of the "twins paradox", so simple that it has been taught to Senior High School last-year students or University undergraduate students; all the present work, more in general, is addressed mainly to them. In the second part of this paper, we analyse the general meaning of Einstein's contributions to philosophy and pedagogy. The third part is entirely devoted to our main subject, i.e., to discussing the "Responsibility of the Intellectuals". The reader interested chiefly in this last part, can find it re-expounded in a self-contained way in the Appendix. More information in the Contents of this article.

General Physics,History and Philosophy of Physics,Popular Physics
On the role of the Michelson-Morley experiment: Einstein in Chicago

Jeroen van Dongen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-009-0050-5

2009-08-12

Abstract:This article discusses new material, published in Volume 12 of the Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, that addresses Einstein's knowledge of the Michelson-Morley experiment prior to 1905: in a lecture in Chicago in 1921, Einstein referred to the experiment, mentioned when he came upon it, and hinted at its influence. Arguments are presented to explain the contrast with Einstein's later pronouncements on the role of the experiment.

History and Philosophy of Physics
Einstein in the crossroad of the sciences, arts and humanities

Daniel Salomón

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0706.0999

2007-06-07

History and Philosophy of Physics

Abstract:Western thinking underwent a turning point between 1885 and 1925. Einstein in 1905 symbolizes the emblematic hinge of this change of direction. To find an equivalent phenomenon in the past we need to go back to the period from the XV century to the XVII century. It was not a mere reform of codes but a new code. In 1905 the perception of reality changed through the introduction of relativism in three levels of the reference systems: the ego-other relation, the world perceived by the senses, and the 'ideal' universe of the concepts. We will try to identify how this change was expressed and developed in the cited levels, both in the physic and nature based sciences, in the social sciences, and in literature and fine arts. Today, 100 years after, the 1905's generation still proposes us two options: to live sheltered by the dogma that reassures us with its only and exclusive viewpoint claimed objective, or to dare to live with the multiple, the transient, the relative. The first way led to the worst regimes and intolerant ideas of the XX century, the second option throws us into the uncertainty of the creative adventure, but also leads us to the possibility of a fairer society in the XXI century.
Introduction to Volume 15 of The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. The Berlin Years: Writings and Correspondence June 1925 - May 1927

Diana Kormos Buchwald,József Illy,A.J. Kox,Dennis Lehmkuhl,Ze'ev Rosenkranz,Jennifer Nollar James,Anthony Duncan,Marco Giovanelli,Michel Janssen,Daniel J. Kennefick,Issachar Unna,Emily de Araújo,Rudy Hirschmann,Nurit Lifshitz,Barbara Wolff

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1803.10662

2018-03-28

Abstract:This volume covers one of the most thrilling two-year periods in twentieth-century physics, as matrix mechanics - developed chiefly by W. Heisenberg, M. Born, and P. Jordan - and wave mechanics - developed by E. Schrödinger - supplanted the earlier quantum theory. The almost one hundred writings by Einstein, of which a third have never been published, and the more than thirteen hundred letters show Einstein's immense productivity and hectic pace of life. Einstein quickly grasps the conceptual peculiarities involved in the new quantum mechanics, such as the difference between Schrödinger's wave function and a field defined in spacetime, or the emerging statistical interpretation of both matrix and wave mechanics. Inspired by correspondence with G. Y. Rainich, he investigates with Jakob Grommer the problem of motion in general relativity, hoping for a hint at a new avenue to unified field theory. Einstein falls victim to scientific fraud when, in a collaboration with E. Rupp, he becomes convinced that the latter's experiments, aimed at deciding whether excited atoms emit light instantaneously (in quanta) or in a finite time (in waves), confirm a wave-theoretic explanation. While it was known that the teenage Einstein had been romantically involved with Marie Winteler in 1895, newly discovered documents reveal that his love for Marie was rekindled in 1909-10 while he was still married to Mileva Marić. The 1925 Locarno Treaties renew Einstein's optimism in European reconciliation. He backs the `International manifesto against compulsory military service' and continues his participation in the League of Nations' International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation. He remains intensely committed to the shaping of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, although his enthusiasm for this cause is sorely tested.

History and Philosophy of Physics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,Quantum Physics
The Einstein-Varicak Correspondence on Relativistic Rigid Rotation

Tilman Sauer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812834300_0432

2007-04-07

Abstract:The historical significance of the problem of relativistic rigid rotation is reviewed in light of recently published correspondence between Einstein and the mathematician Vladimir Varicak from the years 1909 to 1913.

History and Philosophy of Physics
Les inégalités de Bell et l'article Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, une relecture

Pierre Roussel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1403.1171

2014-03-03

Abstract:The relationship between the Bell article in 1964 and its well known inequalities with the Einstein Podolsky Rosen article in 1935 is revisited. Einstein views on quantum mechanics as stated in many circumstances up to his death in 1955 are recalled. The role of David Bohm is shown to be essential to understand the link between Bell and Einstein's views. This link appears not to be as usually recounted.

History and Philosophy of Physics,Quantum Physics
Contra multos verbos: On scandals of quantum mechanics

Theodorus Maria Nieuwenhuizen

2023-07-21

Abstract:In 2008 Nico van Kampen wrote in his letter {\it The scandal of quantum mechanics}: ``The scandal is that there are still many articles, discussions and textbooks, which advertise various interpretations and philosophical profundities." Not much has changed since then, while social media have given a platform for more of what Nico would term ``a scandal''. A detailed viewpoint is presented on the status of quantum mechanics, distilled from two decades of work with Armen Allahverdyan and Roger Balian on the dynamical solution of Curie-Weiss models for quantum measurement. It embodies a certain minimal form of the statistical interpretation and stays clear of ontological connections. Along the way, comments on various related subjects, terms and interpretations are given.

Quantum Physics
1932 Efforts of Persuasion on the Part of Einstein to Renounce the Cosmological Constant

Galina Weinstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1512.02169

2015-12-07

History and Philosophy of Physics

Abstract:Einstein's 1932 efforts of persuasion to renounce the cosmological constant and his possible influence on Robertson.
The relativity revolution from the perspective of historical epistemology

Jürgen Renn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/430654

Isis

Abstract:This essay analyzes Einstein's relativity revolution as part of a long-term development of knowledge in which the knowledge system of classical physics was reorganized in a process of reflection, described here as a "Copernican process." This process led in 1905 to the introduction of fundamentally new concepts of space, time, matter, and radiation. On the basis of an extensive historical reconstruction, the heuristics of Einstein's creation of the general theory of relativity, completing the relativity revolution, is interpreted as a further transformation of the knowledge of classical physics, starting from conceiving gravitation as a borderline problem between field theory and mechanics. The essay thus provides an answer to the puzzle of how Einstein was able to create a theory capable of accounting for a wide range of phenomena that were discovered only much later.
Historical and philosophical reflections on the Einstein-de Sitter model

Cormac O'Raifeartaigh,Michael O'Keeffe,Simon Mitton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/s13129-021-00007-8

2021-02-13

Abstract:We present some historical and philosophical reflections on the paper "On the Relation Between the Expansion and the Mean Density of the Universe", published by Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter in 1932. In this famous work, Einstein and de Sitter considered a relativistic model of the expanding universe with both the cosmological constant and the curvature of space set to zero. Although the Einstein-deSitter model went on to serve as a standard model in 'big bang' cosmology for many years, we note that the authors do not explicitly consider the evolution of the cosmos in the paper. Indeed, the mathematics of the article are quite puzzling to modern eyes. We consider claims that the paper was neither original nor important; we find that, by providing the first specific analysis of the case of a dynamic cosmology without a cosmological constant or spatial curvature, the authors delivered a unique, simple model with a straightforward relation between cosmic expansion and the mean density of matter that set an important benchmark for both theorists and observers. We consider some philosophical aspects of the model and provide a brief review of its use as a prototype 'big bang' model over much of the 20th century.

History and Philosophy of Physics
Albert Einstein - a Pious Atheist

V. Djokovic,P. Grujic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0706.4400

2007-06-29

History and Philosophy of Physics

Abstract:We consider Einstein's attitude with regard to religion both from sociological and epistemological points of view. An attempt to put it into a wider socio-historical perspective has been made, with the emphasis on his ethnic and religious background. The great scientist was neither anatheist nor a believer in the orthodox sense and the closest labels one might apply would be pantheism/cosmism (ontological view) and agnosticism (epistemological view). His ideas on the divine could be considered as a continuation of a line that can be traced back to Philo of Alexandria, who himself followed the Greek Stoics and Neoplatonists and especially Baruch Spinoza. Einstein's scientific (or rational) and religious (or intuitive) thinking was deeply rooted in the Hellenic culture.
Is Einstein Still Right?

Nicolas Yunes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1510.03845

2015-10-13

Abstract:This is an article commissioned by the Spanish Physics Magazine ("Revista Española de Física") for the Centennial Anniversary of the discovery of General Relativity. The article reviews experimental and observational efforts to test Einstein's theory of General Relativity in a variety of scenarios (from the Solar System to binary pulsars, from the Sag A* to binary black hole and neutron star coalescences).

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Albert Einstein's close friends and colleagues from the Patent Office

Galina Weinstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1205.3904

2012-05-17

Abstract:In the Patent Office Einstein hatched his most beautiful ideas, and there he spent his "Happy Bern Years". These wonderful ideas led to his miraculous year works of 1905. Einstein was not an expert in academic matters, and he was out of academic world. Neither did he meet influential professors, or attend academic meetings. He discussed his ideas with his close friends and colleagues from the Patent Office. In 1907 he finally got his foot into the academic doorway; Einstein became a privatdozent and gave lectures at the University of Bern. However, his first students consisted again of his two close friends and another colleague from the Patent Office.

History and Philosophy of Physics
On Controversies in Relativity Theory

Anatoli Andrei Vankov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/0606130

2006-06-14

General Physics

Abstract:Controversies arise when specialists disagree on some particular issue. This normally occurs in any scientific brunch. We analyze some controversies, which have a good cause in Special Relativity. The paper does not question Special Relativity Theory but it challenges changing deeply held academic beliefs about imaginary experiments in Special Relativity Theory. PACS 03.30.+p

On Einstein's opponents, and other crackpots

Tension in Einstein's Philosophical Thinking

The Epistemic Virtues of the Virtuous Theorist: On Albert Einstein and His Autobiography

Einstein the Stubborn: Correspondence between Einstein and Levi-Civita

Review of Berger and DiRuggiero, "Einstein: The Man and His Mind"

Einstein Against Singularities: Analysis versus Geometry

Historical and Philosophical Aspects of the Einstein World

Einstein, Sciascia, Majorana, Amaldi, e il Rapporto tra Intellettuali e Potere (Einstein, Sciascia, Majorana, Amaldi, and the Relationship of Intellectuals with the Power)

On the role of the Michelson-Morley experiment: Einstein in Chicago

Einstein in the crossroad of the sciences, arts and humanities

Introduction to Volume 15 of The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. The Berlin Years: Writings and Correspondence June 1925 - May 1927

The Einstein-Varicak Correspondence on Relativistic Rigid Rotation

Les inégalités de Bell et l'article Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, une relecture

Contra multos verbos: On scandals of quantum mechanics

1932 Efforts of Persuasion on the Part of Einstein to Renounce the Cosmological Constant

The relativity revolution from the perspective of historical epistemology

Historical and philosophical reflections on the Einstein-de Sitter model

Albert Einstein - a Pious Atheist

Is Einstein Still Right?

Albert Einstein's close friends and colleagues from the Patent Office

On Controversies in Relativity Theory