How Einstein built on the past to make his breakthroughs

Helge Kragh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00171-z

IF: 64.8

2024-01-24

Nature

Abstract:The iconic physicist's theories of relativity and atomic motions were not so revolutionary, a penetrating history argues. The iconic physicist's theories of relativity and atomic motions were not so revolutionary, a penetrating history argues.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The relativity revolution from the perspective of historical epistemology

Jürgen Renn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/430654

Isis

Abstract:This essay analyzes Einstein's relativity revolution as part of a long-term development of knowledge in which the knowledge system of classical physics was reorganized in a process of reflection, described here as a "Copernican process." This process led in 1905 to the introduction of fundamentally new concepts of space, time, matter, and radiation. On the basis of an extensive historical reconstruction, the heuristics of Einstein's creation of the general theory of relativity, completing the relativity revolution, is interpreted as a further transformation of the knowledge of classical physics, starting from conceiving gravitation as a borderline problem between field theory and mechanics. The essay thus provides an answer to the puzzle of how Einstein was able to create a theory capable of accounting for a wide range of phenomena that were discovered only much later.
Einstein'S Impact on Theoretical Physics

CN YANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2914117

1998-01-01

Abstract:There occurred in the early years of this century three conceptual revolutions that profoundly changed Man's understanding of the physical universe: the special theory of relativity (in 1905), the general theory of relativity (1915) and quantum mechanics (1925). Einstein personally was responsible for the first two of these revolutions, and influenced and helped to shape the third. But it is not about his work in these conceptual revolutions that I shall write here. Much has been written about that work already. Instead, I shall discuss, in general terms, Einstein's insights on the structure of theoretical physics and their relevance to the development of physics in the second half of this century. I shall divide the discussion into four sections which are, of course, very much related.
Biographies of Albert Einstein -- Mastermind of Theoretical Physics

Galina Weinstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1205.5539

2012-05-24

History and Philosophy of Physics

Abstract:Over the years many have written biographies of Einstein. They all based their biographies on primary sources, archival material: memories and letters of people who were in contact with Einstein, Einstein's own recollections; interviews that Einstein had given over the years, and letters of Einstein to his friends - youth friends like Marcel Grossman and Michele Besso and later friends and colleagues like Heinrich Zangger; and especially his love letters with Mileva Mari\'c. One can demarcate between two types of biographies, namely, Documentary biographies, and, Non-documentary biographies. Non-documentary biographies were written by people who based themselves on documentary biographies and on other non-documentary biographies. Documentary biographies were written by people who knew Einstein personally, and received information from him and from other people who were in personal contact with him. This type can be further divided into two subgroups: books that were written while Einstein was still alive, and books that were written after his death. Among the first group there were some biographies that Einstein considered to be more reliable, others he thought were less reliable, and still other biographies which he considered to be almost pure imagination. I will demonstrate that relying on primary sources and "documentary" does not necessarily mean "reliable".
The Epistemic Virtues of the Virtuous Theorist: On Albert Einstein and His Autobiography

Jeroen van Dongen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2002.01301

2020-02-04

History and Philosophy of Physics

Abstract:Albert Einstein's practice in physics and his philosophical positions gradually reoriented themselves from more empiricist towards rationalist viewpoints. This change accompanied his turn towards unified field theory and different presentations of himself, eventually leading to his highly programmatic Autobiographical Notes in 1949. Einstein enlisted his own history and professional stature to mold an ideal of a theoretical physicist who represented particular epistemic virtues and moral qualities. These in turn reflected the theoretical ideas of his strongly mathematical unification program and professed Spinozist beliefs.
Was Einstein a Lone Genius?

Galina Weinstein

2023-11-08

Abstract:Albert Einstein's journey to formulate the theory of general relativity involved significant shifts in his approach to gravitational field equations. Starting in 1912, he collaborated with Marcel Grossmann and initially explored broadly covariant field equations. However, in 1913, Einstein discarded these equations in favor of the non-covariant "Entwurf" field equations. This shift was a crucial step in his path to the final theory of general relativity, which he eventually achieved in 1915. This analysis explores Einstein's evolving ideas and decisions regarding the mathematical framework of his theory of gravity during the critical period 1912-1916. My findings in this paper highlight that Einstein's brilliance did not exist in isolation but thrived within a vibrant scientific discourse. His work was significantly enriched through contributions and discussions with friends and colleagues, notably Michele Besso and Marcel Grossmann, illustrating the collaborative essence of scientific advancement. Nevertheless, it is essential to recognize that while these individuals made substantial contributions, they did not share an equal role in shaping the fundamental framework of general relativity, which remained predominantly Einstein's intellectual creation. This nuanced perspective enhances our grasp of the pivotal role played by collaborative dynamics in the development of groundbreaking theories.

History and Philosophy of Physics
Historical Approach to Physics according to Kant, Einstein, and Hegel

Y. S. Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1301.6091

2013-01-25

History and Philosophy of Physics

Abstract:It is known that Einstein's conceptual base for his theory of relativity was the philosophy formulated by Immanuel Kant. Things appear differently to observers in different frames. However, Kant's Ding-an-Sich leads to the existence of the absolute reference frame which is not acceptable in Einstein's theory. It is possible to avoid this conflict using the ancient Chinese philosophy of Taoism where two different views can co-exist in harmony. This is not enough to explain Einstein's discovery of the mass-energy relation. The energy-momentum relations for slow and ultra-fast particles take different forms. Einstein was able to synthesize these two formulas to create his energy-mass relation. Indeed, this is what Hegelianism is about in physics. Isaac Newton synthesized open orbits for comets and closed orbits for planets to create his second law of motion. Maxwell combined electricity and magnetism to create his four equations to the present-day wireless world. In order to synthesize wave and particle views of matter, Heisenberg formulated his uncertainty principle. Relativity and quantum mechanics are the two greatest theories formulated in the 20th Century. Efforts to synthesize these two theories are discussed in detail.
Albert Einstein's Methodology

Galina Weinstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1209.5181

2012-09-24

Abstract:This paper discusses Einstein's methodology. 1. Einstein characterized his work as a theory of principle and reasoned that beyond kinematics, the 1905 heuristic relativity principle could offer new connections between non-kinematical concepts. 2. Einstein's creativity and inventiveness and process of thinking; invention or discovery. 3. Einstein considered his best friend Michele Besso as a sounding board and his class-mate from the Polytechnic Marcel Grossman, as his active partner. Yet, Einstein wrote to Arnold Sommerfeld that Grossman will never claim to be considered a co-discoverer of the Einstein-Grossmann theory. He only helped in guiding Einstein through the mathematical literature, but contributed nothing of substance to the results of the theory. Hence, Einstein neither considered Besso or Grossmann as co-discoverers of the relativity theory which he invented.

History and Philosophy of Physics
Albert Einstein: Opportunity and Perception

Chen Ning Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217751x06033192

2006-01-01

Abstract:The year 1905 has been called Albert Einstein’s “Annus Mirabilis.” It was during that year that he caused revolutionary changes in man’s primordial concepts about the physical world: space, time, energy, light and matter. How could a 26-year-old clerk, previously unknown, cause such profound conceptual changes, and thereby open the door to the era of modern scientific technological world? No one, of course, can answer that question. But one can, perhaps, analyze some factors that were essential to his stepping into such a historic role. First of all, Einstein was extraordinary lucky: he was born at the right time, and was at the peak of his creative powers when the world of physics was shuddering from multiple crises. In other words, there was the lucky opportunity for him to change the course of physics, an opportunity unmatched, perhaps, since the time of Newton. Such lucky opportunities occur very very infrequently. In E. T. Bell’s Man of Mathematics, Lagrange (1736–1813) was quoted as having said:
Einstein as armchair detective: The case of stimulated radiation

Vasant Natarajan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1307.1441

2013-07-03

Abstract:Einstein was in many ways like a detective on a mystery trail, though in his case he was on the trail of nature's mysteries and not some murder mystery! And like all good detectives he had a style. It consisted of taking facts that he knew were correct and forcing nature into a situation that would contradict this established truth. In this process she would be forced to reveal some new truths. Einstein's 1917 paper on the quantum theory of radiation is a classic example of this style and enabled him to predict the existence of stimulated radiation starting from an analysis of thermodynamic equilibrium between matter and radiation.

General Physics
Einstein's 1912-1913 struggles with Gravitation Theory: Importance of Static Gravitational Fields Theory

Galina Weinstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1202.2791

2012-02-14

Abstract:In December 1911, Max Abraham published a paper on gravitation at the basis of which was Albert Einstein's 1911 June conclusion about a relationship between the velocity of light and the gravitational potential. In February 1912, Einstein published his work on static gravitational fields, which was based on his 1911 June theory. In March 1912, Einstein corrected his paper, but Abraham claimed that Einstein borrowed his equations; however, it was actually Abraham who needed Einstein's ideas and not the other way round. Einstein thought that Abraham converted to his theory of static fields while Abraham presumed exactly the opposite. Einstein then moved to Zurich and switched to new mathematical tools. He examined various candidates for generally covariant field equations, and already considered the field equations of his general theory of relativity about three years before he published them in November 1915. However, he discarded these equations only to return to them more than three years later. Einstein's 1912 theory of static fields finally led him to reject the generally covariant field equations and to develop limited generally covariant field equations.

History and Philosophy of Physics
A Revolution in Science: the Eclipse Expeditions of 1919

Peter Coles

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2019.1624000

2022-08-31

Abstract:The first direct experimental test of Einstein's theory of general relativity involved a pair of expeditions to measure the bending of light at a total solar eclipse that took place one hundred years ago, on 29 May 1919. So famous is this experiment, and so dramatic was the impact on Einstein himself, that history tends not to recognise the controversy that surrounded the results at the time. In this article, I discuss the experiment in its scientific and historical background context and explain why it was, and is, such an important episode in the development of modern physics.

Astrophysics
Visions of Revolutions: Microphysics and Cosmophysics in the 1930s

Helge Kragh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1111.6163

2011-11-26

History and Philosophy of Physics

Abstract:By 1930, at a time when the new physics based on relativity and quantum theory had reached a state of consolidation, problems of a foundational kind began to abound. Physicists began to speak of a new "crisis" and envisage a forthcoming "revolution" of a scale similar to the one in the mid-1920s. The perceived crisis was an issue not only in microphysics but also in cosmology, where it resulted in ambitious cosmophysical theories that transcended the ordinary methods of physics. The uncertain cognitive situation was, in some circles, associated to the uncertain political and moral situation. Did the problems of foundational physics demand a revolution in thinking that somehow paralleled the political revolutions of the time? I argue that although such ideas were indeed discussed in the 1930s, they were more rhetoric than reality. With the benefit of hindsight one can see that the perceived crisis was only temporary and not significantly related to social or ideological developments in the decade.
Historical and Philosophical Aspects of the Einstein World

Cormac O'Raifeartaigh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.08678

2019-06-20

Abstract:This article presents a brief review of some historical and philosophical aspects of Einstein's 1917 paper 'Cosmological Considerations in the General Theory of Relativity', a landmark work that denoted the starting point of modern theoretical cosmology. Our presentation includes a discussion of Einstein's early views of issues such as the relativity of inertia, the curvature of space and the cosmological constant. Particular attention is paid to lesser-known aspects of Einstein's paper such as his failure to test his model against observation, his failure to consider the stability of the model and a slight mathematical confusion concerning the introduction of the cosmological constant term. Taken in conjunction with his later cosmological works, we find that Einstein's approach to cosmology was characterized by a pragmatic search for the simplest model of the universe that was consistent with the principles of relativity and with contemporaneous astronomical observation.

History and Philosophy of Physics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Albert Einstein at the Zürich Polytechnic: a rare mastery of Maxwell's electromagnetic theory

Galina Weinstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1205.4335

2012-05-19

Abstract:Einstein at the Zürich Polytechnic: he skipped classes, did not attend all the lectures of his Professors, and before going to the examinations he studied instead from the notebooks of his good friend from class, Marcel Grossmann. Einstein the free-thinker did not respect the two major professors in the Polytechnic - Heinrich Friedrich Weber and Jean Pernet - who eventually turned on him. He felt that his beloved science had lost its appeal because Weber's lectures did not include Maxwell's electromagnetic theory. Einstein seldom showed up to Pernet's practical physics course. By his fourth-rightness and his distrust of authority he had alienated his professors, especially Weber, who apparently conceived a particular dislike of him. At the Zürich Polytechnic, Einstein could not easily bring himself to study what did not interest him. Most of his time he spent on his own studying Maxwell's theory and learning at first hand the works of great pioneers in science and philosophy: Boltzmann, Helmholtz, Kirchhoff, Hertz, Mach. Eventually, Einstein finished first in his class in the intermediate exams; second after him was his note taker Grossmann. Do not ever try Einstein's recipe for studying in college, because after obtaining the diploma, when he sought university positions, he was rebuffed. Finally rescue came from Grossmann, and thanks to him and his father Einstein obtained a post in the Patent Office. There are strong reasons to believe that it was Einstein's rare mastery of Maxwell's electromagnetic theory that ultimately prompted the Director of the Patent Office to offer him a job.

History and Philosophy of Physics
Einstein, Kant, and Taoism

Y. S. Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/0604027

2006-04-05

History and Philosophy of Physics

Abstract:It is said that Einstein's conceptual base for the theory of relativity was the philosophy formulated by Immanuel Kant. Then, is it possible to see how Kant played a role in Einstein's thinking without reading Kant's books? This question arises because it is not possible for physicists to read Kant's writings. Yes, it is possible if we use the method of physics. It is known also that Kant's mode of thinking was profoundly affected by the geography of Koenigsberg where he spent eighty years of entire life. We examine what aspect of this geography led Kant to create his philosophy upon which Einstein's concept of relativity was based. It is pointed out that the Eastern philosophy of Taoism is a product of the geographical environment similar to that of Kant's Koenigsberg, and therefore that Kantianism is strikingly similar to Taoism.
Lessons from Einstein's 1915 discovery of general relativity

Lee Smolin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1512.07551

2015-12-23

History and Philosophy of Physics

Abstract:There is a myth that Einstein's discovery of general relativity was due to his following beautiful mathematics to discover new insights about nature. I argue that this is an incorrect reading of the history and that what Einstein did was to follow physical insights which arose from asking that the story we tell of how nature works be coherent.
Einstein in the crossroad of the sciences, arts and humanities

Daniel Salomón

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0706.0999

2007-06-07

History and Philosophy of Physics

Abstract:Western thinking underwent a turning point between 1885 and 1925. Einstein in 1905 symbolizes the emblematic hinge of this change of direction. To find an equivalent phenomenon in the past we need to go back to the period from the XV century to the XVII century. It was not a mere reform of codes but a new code. In 1905 the perception of reality changed through the introduction of relativism in three levels of the reference systems: the ego-other relation, the world perceived by the senses, and the 'ideal' universe of the concepts. We will try to identify how this change was expressed and developed in the cited levels, both in the physic and nature based sciences, in the social sciences, and in literature and fine arts. Today, 100 years after, the 1905's generation still proposes us two options: to live sheltered by the dogma that reassures us with its only and exclusive viewpoint claimed objective, or to dare to live with the multiple, the transient, the relative. The first way led to the worst regimes and intolerant ideas of the XX century, the second option throws us into the uncertainty of the creative adventure, but also leads us to the possibility of a fairer society in the XXI century.
A new perspective on Einstein's philosophy of cosmology

Cormac O'Raifeartaigh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1504.02873

2016-01-09

Abstract:The recent discovery that Einstein once attempted - and quickly abandoned - a steady-state model of the expanding universe sheds new light on his philosophical journey from static to dynamic cosmologies.

History and Philosophy of Physics,Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Albert Einstein's close friends and colleagues from the Patent Office

Galina Weinstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1205.3904

2012-05-17

Abstract:In the Patent Office Einstein hatched his most beautiful ideas, and there he spent his "Happy Bern Years". These wonderful ideas led to his miraculous year works of 1905. Einstein was not an expert in academic matters, and he was out of academic world. Neither did he meet influential professors, or attend academic meetings. He discussed his ideas with his close friends and colleagues from the Patent Office. In 1907 he finally got his foot into the academic doorway; Einstein became a privatdozent and gave lectures at the University of Bern. However, his first students consisted again of his two close friends and another colleague from the Patent Office.

History and Philosophy of Physics
Albert Einstein: Rebellious Wunderkind

Galina Weinstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1205.4509

2012-05-21

History and Philosophy of Physics

Abstract:Childhood and Schooldays: Albert Einstein, and the family members seemed to have exaggerated the story of Albert who developed slowly, learned to talk late, and whose parents thought he was abnormal. These and other stories were adopted by biographers as if they really happened in the form that Albert and his sister told them. Hence biographers were inspired by them to create a mythical public image of Albert Einstein. Albert had tendency toward temper tantrums, the young impudent rebel Einstein had an impulsive and upright nature. He rebelled against authority and refused to learn by rote. He could not easily bring himself to study what did not interest him at school, especially humanistic subjects. And so his sister told the story that his Greek professor, to whom he once submitted an especially poor paper, went so far in his anger to declare that nothing would ever become of him. Albert learned subjects in advance when it came to sciences; and during the vacation of a few months from school, Albert independently worked his way through the entire prospective Gymnasium syllabus. He also taught himself natural science, geometry and philosophy by reading books that he obtained from a poor Jewish medical student of Polish nationality, Max Talmud, and from his uncle Jacob Einstein.

How Einstein built on the past to make his breakthroughs

The relativity revolution from the perspective of historical epistemology

Einstein'S Impact on Theoretical Physics

Biographies of Albert Einstein -- Mastermind of Theoretical Physics

The Epistemic Virtues of the Virtuous Theorist: On Albert Einstein and His Autobiography

Was Einstein a Lone Genius?

Historical Approach to Physics according to Kant, Einstein, and Hegel

Albert Einstein's Methodology

Albert Einstein: Opportunity and Perception

Einstein as armchair detective: The case of stimulated radiation

Einstein's 1912-1913 struggles with Gravitation Theory: Importance of Static Gravitational Fields Theory

A Revolution in Science: the Eclipse Expeditions of 1919

Visions of Revolutions: Microphysics and Cosmophysics in the 1930s

Historical and Philosophical Aspects of the Einstein World

Albert Einstein at the Zürich Polytechnic: a rare mastery of Maxwell's electromagnetic theory

Einstein, Kant, and Taoism

Lessons from Einstein's 1915 discovery of general relativity

Einstein in the crossroad of the sciences, arts and humanities

A new perspective on Einstein's philosophy of cosmology

Albert Einstein's close friends and colleagues from the Patent Office

Albert Einstein: Rebellious Wunderkind