Abstract:This paper provides the historical, cultural, and clinical context for the relationship between Bruno Bettelheim (1903-1990) and Rudolf Ekstein (1912-2005). Both were Viennese-born and trained intellectuals who received doctorates in the human sciences from the University of Vienna in 1937. Both were deeply identified with lay analysis, emphasizing that for psychoanalysis to perpetuate itself it needed to promote serious and rigorous forms of research. Because Bettelheim was the better known of the two, this introduction focuses on Ekstein's family history, with special emphasis on his experience of loss and trauma and his capacity to recover from personal and educational obstacles. It argues that Ekstein was a representative product of Austro-Marxism in the period between the wars, embracing the ethical brand of democratic socialism and group solidarity that was integral to the theory and practice of Austrian Social Democracy. It discusses Ekstein's training with Moritz Schlick in philosophy and his immersion in the Vienna Circle of logical positivism. From Schlick, Ekstein evolved into a philosophical thinker who learned how to think his own thoughts. Ekstein joined the circle of psychoanalytic pedagogues who clustered around the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society, under the tutelage of Willi Hoffer, August Aichhorn and, above all, Anna Freud. The clinical component of psychoanalysis emanated from his commitment to understanding the inner world of the child. Bettelheim and Ekstein first became aware of each other from reading the analytic literature and finally met in America in the 1950s. They shared a professional interest in conducting research and doing clinical work on severely disturbed children and adolescents, including those with psychotic, borderline and autistic diagnoses. They debated the value of milieu therapy versus psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy on such children. As their relationship evolved, the two collaborated and began a fascinating correspondence that gradually evolved into an intimate friendship. They both engaged in a polemic with Bernard Rimland, who was massively critical of their clinical work and a hostile critic of psychoanalytic approaches to the treatment of disturbed children. Rimland was an advocate of a neurological approach to mental illness, with an emphasis on biology and psychopharmacology. The 22 letters that constitute the Bettelheim-Ekstein exchange began with clinical concerns, including the varieties of solitude, isolation and countertransference disruptions that may trouble the psychoanalytic researcher and clinician in dealing with primitively disordered children. It moves to other issues, including mutual support during the Rimland Affair. As the two became more friendly, a pattern of good-natured competition and envy appeared. The two engaged in a heated exchange on the question of whether contemporary Vienna remained as anti-Semitic as it had been in their respective youths: Bettelheim, the concentration camp survivor, argued that nothing had changed and that most Austrians remained viscerally anti-Semitic; Ekstein, the Austro-Marxist, contended that one could not blame a generation born after World War II, holding that in his experience many Austrians had examined their consciences and held distinctly different options from their parents or grandparents. Toward the end of their correspondence, we encounter Ekstein's tender sensitivity to Bettelheim's descent into depression as a result of the death of his wife, Trude, leading eventually to recurrent episodes of suicidal ideation and plans for his own suicide. The letters testify to a unique friendship with a somewhat old-world quality.

The two 'strongest pillars of the empiricist wing': the Vienna Circle, German academia and emigration in the light of correspondence between Philipp Frank and Richard von Mises (1916-1939)

The Vacuity Of Ludwig Von Mises'S Apriorism

From “Socialist Accounting” to the “Livelihood of Man”: The Viennese and the Columbia Polanyi

Émigré Economists In America: Their Impact And Their Experiences

György Márkus, 75% mensch: On the occasion of the publication of the English version of How Is Critical Economic Theory Possible?

A Viennese Library in Exile: Otto Neurath and the Heritage of Central European Culture in the Anglo-Saxon World

The Correspondence of Bruno Bettelheim and Rudolf Ekstein

Method Versus Truth (Part 1. In the Direction for One-Dimensionality — the Formation of Frankfurt School’s Critical Theory)

"Resistance leads to self-destruction": how an (a)political strategy helped Karl von Frisch succeed during the Nazi era

Klein vs Mehrtens: restoring the reputation of a great modern

["Impossible to be part of this system any longer": the expulsion of neuroscientists from Frankfurt am Main (1933-1939)]

Modernism, modernity, and politics in the general history of science: Implications of Herbert Mehrtens' work, from "Vienna 1900" to the Nazi era, and beyond

Carl Schmitt and Georg Simmel in the perspective of the theory of international relations and international law

Introduction to Volume 15 of The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. The Berlin Years: Writings and Correspondence June 1925 - May 1927

The ontological identity of empirical indiscernibles: Leibniz's methodological principle and its significance in the work of Einstein

The Limits of the ‘Autumn of Historiography’: on Frank Ankersmit’s Postmodernist Moment

Political realism between American republicanism and German elitism

On the Philosophical Foundations of Physics: An Experimentalist's Perspective

Emigrant psychoanalysts in the USA and the FBI archives

Neuroscience research in the Max Planck Society and a broken relationship to the past: Some legacies of the Kaiser Wilhelm Society after 1948

Spectres of Mises: controversial methodological claims reassessed