Simple model for frequency response of a resonant tunneling diode caused by potential change of quantum well due to electron charge

Masahiro Asada,Safumi Suzuki
2023-05-27
Abstract:The frequency dependence of negative differential conductance (NDC) is an important property for the resonant-tunneling-diode terahertz source. Among several phenomena determining the frequency dependence, this paper shows that the effect of potential change of the quantum well due to electron charge can be analyzed with a simple and tractable model based on the tunneling admittance and capacitance. The result is identical to that of Feiginov's analysis based on more fundamental equations, showing a one-to-one correspondence between the parameters of the two analyses. Similar to Feiginov's analysis, our analysis also shows that NDC remains finite even at infinitely high frequency. It is shown in our model that this result is attributed to neglecting the tunneling time at the emitter barrier. Comprehensive analysis of the frequency dependence of NDC will be possible by incorporating the tunneling time into the present model.
Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics,Applied Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Analyze the frequency dependence of negative differential conductance (NDC) in resonant tunneling diodes (RTDs) due to the change in quantum - well potential**. Specifically, the author studies the following aspects through a simplified model: 1. **The influence of the quantum - well potential due to the change in electron charge**: This potential change has a significant impact on the frequency response of NDC. 2. **Modeling of tunnel conductance and capacitance**: Tunnel conductance and capacitance are introduced to describe the electron flow and potential change in RTDs. 3. **Comparison with Feiginov's previous work**: It is verified that the results of the simplified model are consistent with Feiginov's analysis results based on more fundamental equations, and a one - to - one correspondence between the parameters of the two is established. 4. **NDC characteristics in the high - frequency limit**: It is explained why NDC still maintains a finite value at an infinitely high frequency, which is attributed to the neglect of the tunneling time at the emitter barrier. ### Main contributions of the paper - **Validity of the simplified model**: It is proved that the simplified model using tunnel conductance and capacitance can accurately describe the frequency dependence of NDC caused by the change in quantum - well potential. - **Parameter correspondence**: A one - to - one parameter correspondence between the simplified model and Feiginov's analysis is established, ensuring the consistency of the two methods. - **Explanation of high - frequency NDC characteristics**: The reason why NDC remains finite in the high - frequency limit is revealed, and the influence of neglecting the tunneling time of the emitter barrier is pointed out. - **Future research directions**: The possibility of incorporating the tunneling time and the residence time in the quantum well into the model for a more comprehensive analysis is proposed. ### Summary of mathematical formulas To better understand these phenomena, some key formulas are involved in the paper: 1. **Current density under steady - state conditions**: \[ J_e = J_c = \frac{T_e T_c}{T_e + T_c} N_e \] \[ N_{qw} = \frac{T_e}{T_e + T_c} N_e \] 2. **Differential conductance of the emitter barrier**: \[ G_e = \frac{\partial J_e}{\partial V_e} = \frac{T_c}{T_e + T_c} \left( T_e' \frac{T_c}{T_e + T_c} N_e + T_e N_e' \right) \] 3. **Basic equations for AC components**: \[ j_e = T_e' (N_e - N_{qw}) v_e + T_e (n_e - n_{qw}) \] \[ j_c \approx T_c n_{qw} \] \[ \frac{d n_{qw}}{dt} = j_e - j_c \] 4. **Admittance in the equivalent circuit**: \[ Y_e = \frac{1 + j \omega \tau_c}{1 + j \omega \tau_{dwed}} \] where, \[ \tau_c = \frac{1}{T_c}, \quad \tau_{dwed} = \frac{1}{T_e + T_c} \] 5. **Frequency response of NDC**: \[ Y_{RTD} = G_\infty + \frac{G_0 - G_\infty}{1 + j \omega \tau_{res}} \] where, \[ G_0 = \frac{G_e C_c}{\tau_c G_e + C_e + C_c}, \quad G_\infty = G_e \left( \frac{C_c}{C_e + C_c} \right)^2 \frac{\tau_c}{\tau_{dwed}}, \quad \tau_{res}