Comment on "Compton Scattering Spectrum for Si and Ge Systems", by Chen-Kai Qiao et al. DOI 10.1088/1361-6471/ab5e35

Kahane Sylvian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09137

2022-12-19

Abstract:It is pointed out that theoretical prediction in a paper published in 2020 were experimentally verified some 50 years ago.

Nuclear Experiment

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Comment on “Ground-State Description of Quasi-One-dimensional Polarons with Arbitrary Electron-Phonon Coupling Strength”

QH Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.59.11077

IF: 3.7

1999-01-01

Physical Review B

Abstract:It is shown that the main result presented by Ercelebi and Senger [Phys. Rev. B $53$, 11 008 (1996)] is unreasonable, and is only an artifact produced by a variational scheme rather than an intrinsic property of the system.
Compton scattering energy spectrum for Si and Ge systems

Chen-Kai Qiao,Hsin-Chang Chi,Shin-Ted Lin,Peng Gu,Shu-Kui Liu,Chang-Jian Tang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ab5e35

2020-01-01

Abstract:In the present work, we study the atomic Compton scattering that could have a great impact on dark matter direct detection experiments. We give a quantitative analysis of the Compton scattering energy spectrum for Si and Ge atomic systems. The theoretical results on Compton scattering are calculated within the frameworks of free electron approximation (FEA) and relativistic impulse approximation (RIA). The low-energy transfer and near photoionization threshold regions are especially considered in this work. In RIA calculations, to obtain the atomic ground states, we adopt an ab initio calculation in the fully relativistic Dirac-Fock theory.
Qin Et Al. Reply

Nan Qin,Emmanuelle Le Chatelier,Jing Guo,Edi Prifti,Lanjuan Li,S. Dusko Ehrlich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14852

IF: 64.8

2015-01-01

Nature

Abstract:A Reply to the Comment by J. H. Chen and H. Y. Fan.Received 22 May 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.269502© 2013 American Physical Society
Comment on "A sensitivity study of the primary correlators used to characterize chiral-magnetically-driven charge separation'' by Magdy, Nie, Ma, and Lacey

Yicheng Feng,Fuqiang Wang,Jie Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.10057

2020-09-22

Abstract:This note points out an apparent error in the publication Phys.~Lett.~B {\bf 809} (2020) 135771 by Magdy, Nie, Ma, and Lacey.

Nuclear Experiment,Nuclear Theory
Reply to "Comment on 'Fano resonance for Anderson Impurity Systems' "

H. G. Luo,T. Xiang,X. Q. Wang,Z. B. Su,L. Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0504177

2005-04-07

Strongly Correlated Electrons

Abstract:In a recent Comment, Kolf et al. (cond-mat/0503669) state that our analysis of the Fano resonance for Anderson impurity systems [Luo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 92, 256602 (2004)] is incorrect. Here we want to point out that their comments are not based on firm physical results and their criticisms are unjustified and invalid.
Comment on <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="cond-mat/0007299" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0007299">cond-mat/0007299</a> by Schofield and Sandeman : inconsistency with experiments

George Kastrinakis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0112478

2001-12-28

Abstract:The inconsistency of <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="cond-mat/0007299" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0007299">cond-mat/0007299</a> and Phys. Rev. B 63 094510 (2001) with ARPES and resistivity data is pointed-out.

Strongly Correlated Electrons,Superconductivity
Reply to "Comment on 'Nontrivial Quantum Geometry and the Strength of Electron-Phonon Coupling',

Jiabin Yu,Christopher J. Ciccarino,Raffaello Bianco,Ion Errea,Prineha Narang,B. Andrei Bernevig

2023-06-07

Abstract:This is our reply to "Comment on 'Nontrivial Quantum Geometry and the Strength of Electron-Phonon Coupling', <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2305.02340" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02340">arXiv:2305.02340</a>, J. Yu, C. J. Ciccarino, R. Bianco, I. Errea, P. Narang, B. A. Bernevig" by Prof. Pickett, which focuses on the MgB$_2$ part of our work. We show that the entirety of the criticism in Prof. Pickett's comment pertaining to our work (<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2305.02340" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02340">arXiv:2305.02340</a>) is invalid.

Superconductivity
Comment on "discrepancies in the Resonance-Fluorescence Spectrum Calculated with Two Methods"

Qing Xu,Xiang-ming Hu,Jian-wu Yin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.79.057401

IF: 2.971

2009-01-01

Physical Review A

Abstract:There are two alternative methods used in the literature to calculate the incoherent part of the spectrum of light scattered by an atomic system. In the first, one calculates the spectrum of the total light scattered by the system and obtains the incoherent part by subtracting the coherent part. In the second method, one introduces the fluctuation operators and obtains the incoherent part of the spectrum by taking the Fourier transform of the two-time correlation function of the fluctuation operators. These two methods have been recognized for years as completely equivalent for evaluating the incoherent part of the spectrum. In a recent paper, Xu [Phys. Rev. A 78, 013407 (2008)] showed that there are discrepancies between the incoherent parts of the stationary spectrum of a three-level Lambda-type system calculated with these two methods. The predicted discrepancies can be severe that over a wide range of the Rabi frequencies and atomic decay rates, the spectrum calculated with the variance method can have negative values. In this Comment, we show that there are no discrepancies between these two methods. We show the equivalence of these two methods that leads to the same incoherent spectra which are positive for all frequencies independent of values of the parameters involved. We also identify the source of the discrepancy, that is, in an incorrect treatment of the incoherent part of the spectrum calculated with the two-time correlation function of the fluctuation operators.
Comment on Zhao's 'ab initio' calculation

Kuang Xiao-yu,Chen Zhong-hou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/21/12/024

1988-01-01

Abstract:Kuang and Chen show that the SCF d orbital has been falsified by Zhao Min-guang and his co-workers (1982-5), and all works that are based on the Zhao's SCF d orbital are not ab initio calculations.
Comment on “berry Phase in a Composite System”

Lin‐Hai Han,Yong Guo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.100.168901

IF: 8.6

2008-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Comment on the Letter by X. X. Yi, L. C. Wang, and T. Y. Zheng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 150406 (2004). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 2 April 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.168901©2008 American Physical Society
Comment on "superhard Pseudocubic BC2N Superlattices".

Changfeng Chen,Hong Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.99.159601

IF: 8.6

2007-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:A Comment on the Letter by Shiyou Chen, X. G. Gong, and Su-Huai Wei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 015502 (2007). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 19 March 2007DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.159601©2007 American Physical Society
Correction: Construction of PtSe2/Ge heterostructure-based short-wavelength infrared photodetector array for image sensing and optical communication applications.

L. Luo,Chenhao Xu,Chao Xie,Jie Ding,Wenbin Li,Xinyi Shen,Yu Lu,Yue Wang,Wanying Zhou,Zipeng Qin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d1nr90101j

IF: 6.7

2021-06-04

Nanoscale

Abstract:Correction for 'Construction of PtSe2/Ge heterostructure-based short-wavelength infrared photodetector array for image sensing and optical communication applications' by Yu Lu et al., Nanoscale, 2021, 13, 7606-7612, DOI: 10.1039/D1NR00333J.

Engineering,Medicine,Materials Science,Physics
Comment on "Crossover of collective modes and positive sound dispersion in supercritical state"

T. Bryk,I. Mryglod

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1612.08671

2016-12-28

Abstract:We comment on an expression for positive sound dispersion (PSD) in fluids and analysis of PSD from molecular dynamics simulations reported in the Letter by Fomin et al (<a class="link-external link-http" href="http://J.Phys" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>.:<a class="link-external link-http" href="http://Condens.Matt" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>. v.28, 43LT01, 2016)

Soft Condensed Matter,Disordered Systems and Neural Networks
Comment on "Quantum waveguide array generator for performing Fourier transforms: Alternate route to quantum computing"

Daniel A. Lidar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0308124

2003-08-22

Quantum Physics

Abstract:A Comment on the paper "Quantum waveguide array generator for performing Fourier transforms: Alternate route to quantum computing" by R. Akis and D.K. Ferry, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 2823 (2001). The authors reply in Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 2420 (2002).
Erratum to “Metal–Insulator Transition of Ge–Sb–Te Superlattice: An Electron Counting Model Study” [Jan 18 140-146]

Nian-Ke Chen,Xian-Bin Li,Xue-Peng Wang,Sheng-Yi Xie,Wei Quan Tian,Shengbai Zhang,Hong-Bo Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNANO.2018.2823098

2018-01-01

IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology

Abstract:Presents corrections to the paper, “Metal–insulator transition ofGe–Sb–Te superlattice: An electron counting model study,” (Chen, N.-K.), IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 140–146, Jan. 2018.
Comment on Quantum Interference between Light Sources Separated by 150 Million Kilometers Deng et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 123, 080401 (2019)

Shaul Mukamel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.02376

2020-01-08

Abstract:This is a comment on the paper : Quantum Interference between Light Sources Separated by 150 Million Kilometers by Deng et al, PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 123, 080401 (2019)

Quantum Physics
Chen and Itoi Reply

Wei Chen,Chigak Itoi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/9405182

1994-05-27

High Energy Physics - Theory

Abstract:We reply a Comment (hep-th/xxx) on our recent paper published in Phys Rev Lett 72 (1994) 2527-2530. We point out that the author of the Comment overlooks the highly non-trivial Chern-Simons interactions and his hand-waving arguments are totally groundless.
Conformity Experiment on Inelastic Scattering Exponent of Electrons in Two Dimensions

Ching-Chen Yeh,Pin-Chi Liao,Yanfei Yang,Wei-Chen Lin,Alireza R. Panna,Albert F. Rigosi,Randolph E. Elmquist,Chi-Te Liang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.133.096302

IF: 8.6

2024-08-28

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:The quantum Hall (QH) effect is one of the most widely studied physical phenomenon in two dimensions. The plateau-plateau transition within this effect can be comprehensively described by the scaling theory, which encompasses three pivotal exponents: the critical exponent κ , the inelastic scattering exponent p , and the universal exponent γ . Prior studies have focused on measuring κ and estimating γ , assuming a constant p value of 2 across magnetic fields. Here, our work marks a significant advancement by measuring all three exponents within a single graphene device and a conventional two-dimensional electron system. This study uniquely determines p at low magnetic fields (weak localization region and well outside the QH regime) and high magnetic fields (in the vicinity of the QH regime). Employing a comprehensive analytical approach that includes weak localization, plateau-plateau transitions, and variable range hopping, we have directly determined κ , p , and γ . Our findings reveal a distinct variation in p , shifting from 1 in the low magnetic field regime to 2 in the QH regime in graphene. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.096302 © 2024 American Physical Society

physics, multidisciplinary
Correction: Corrigendum: Artificial Gauge Field and Topological Phase in a Conventional Two-dimensional Electron Gas with Antidot Lattices

Shi, Likun,Lou, Wenkai,Cheng, F.,Zou, Y. L.,Yang, Wen,Chang, Kai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28215

IF: 4.6

2016-01-01

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Scientific Reports 5: Article number: 15266; published online: 16 October 2015; updated: 07 July 2016 The Authors neglected to cite previous studies related to the existence of intersubband spin-orbit coupling and the use of intersubband spin-orbit coupling to create topological insulator in double quantum wells with antidote lattices.
Re-examination of the SiGe Raman spectra - Linear chain approximation and ab initio calculations

O. Pagès,J. Souhabi,V. J. B. Torres,A. V. Postnikov,K. C. Rustagi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1109.6585

2011-09-29

Materials Science

Abstract:We propose a (three-dimension) -> (one-dimension) shift of paradigm for basic understanding of Raman spectra of random Si-Ge. Fair contour modeling of Raman spectra is achieved along the linear chain approximation via 1D-cluster version of the phenomenological Percolation scheme, originally developed for zincblende alloys, after ab initio calibration of the intrinsic Si-Si, Ge-Ge and Si-Ge Raman efficiencies. The 1D-cluster scheme introduces a seven-oscillator [1x(Ge-Ge), 4x(Si-Ge), 2x(Si-Si)] Raman behavior for SiGe, which considerably deviates from the currently admitted six-oscillator [1x(Ge-Ge), 1x(Si-Ge), 4x(Si-Si)] one. The 1D-cluster re-assignment of Raman lines is based on remarkable intensity-interplays with composition, known from the literature, but so far not properly understood. It is independently supported by ab initio calculation of the frequencies of bond-stretching modes along prototype impurity motifs taken as quasi-linear. Different numbers of Raman modes per bond indicate different sensitivities to the local environment of the Ge-Ge (insensitive), Si-Si (sensitive to 1st neighbors) and Si-Ge (sensitive to 2nd neighbors) bond-stretchings. Last, we compare the SiGe Percolation scheme with the current version for zincblende alloys, using GaAsP as a natural reference. The SiGe vs. GaAsP comparison is supported by ab initio calculation of local lattice relaxation/dynamics related to prototype impurity motifs that are directly transposable to the two crystal structures.

Comment on "Compton Scattering Spectrum for Si and Ge Systems", by Chen-Kai Qiao et al. DOI 10.1088/1361-6471/ab5e35

Comment on “Ground-State Description of Quasi-One-dimensional Polarons with Arbitrary Electron-Phonon Coupling Strength”

Compton scattering energy spectrum for Si and Ge systems

Qin Et Al. Reply

Comment on "A sensitivity study of the primary correlators used to characterize chiral-magnetically-driven charge separation'' by Magdy, Nie, Ma, and Lacey

Reply to "Comment on 'Fano resonance for Anderson Impurity Systems' "

Comment on <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="cond-mat/0007299" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0007299">cond-mat/0007299</a> by Schofield and Sandeman : inconsistency with experiments

Reply to "Comment on 'Nontrivial Quantum Geometry and the Strength of Electron-Phonon Coupling',

Comment on "discrepancies in the Resonance-Fluorescence Spectrum Calculated with Two Methods"

Comment on Zhao's 'ab initio' calculation

Comment on “berry Phase in a Composite System”

Comment on "superhard Pseudocubic BC2N Superlattices".

Correction: Construction of PtSe2/Ge heterostructure-based short-wavelength infrared photodetector array for image sensing and optical communication applications.

Comment on "Crossover of collective modes and positive sound dispersion in supercritical state"

Comment on "Quantum waveguide array generator for performing Fourier transforms: Alternate route to quantum computing"

Erratum to “Metal–Insulator Transition of Ge–Sb–Te Superlattice: An Electron Counting Model Study” [Jan 18 140-146]

Comment on Quantum Interference between Light Sources Separated by 150 Million Kilometers Deng et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 123, 080401 (2019)

Chen and Itoi Reply

Conformity Experiment on Inelastic Scattering Exponent of Electrons in Two Dimensions

Correction: Corrigendum: Artificial Gauge Field and Topological Phase in a Conventional Two-dimensional Electron Gas with Antidot Lattices

Re-examination of the SiGe Raman spectra - Linear chain approximation and ab initio calculations