Performance comparison among three types of adsorbents in CO2 adsorption and recovery from wet flue gas

Yang Yang You,Xiang Jun Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117922
IF: 8.6
2021-02-01
Separation and Purification Technology
Abstract:<p>Properties of adsorbent considerably influence their performance in CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption and recovery from flue gas during vacuum swing adsorption (VSA). Hydrophilic adsorbents have a strong capability to separate CO<sub>2</sub> from N<sub>2</sub> in dry conditions, and hydrophobic adsorbents perform well in CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption and recovery from wet flue gas. Water vapor in real flue gas streams significantly affects CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption and recovery from wet flue gas. Hydrophilic adsorbents can be used for CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption and recovery from wet flue gas after modification. The results of VSA with activated carbon bed and K<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> bed have been described in detail in previous research. This paper proposes a set of new adsorption equilibrium expressions (Sips–Gaussian model) of H<sub>2</sub>O/CO<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub> on 13X and Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> on the basis of a traditional adsorption isotherm model and previous research. Then, a series of calculations of VSA with double-layered Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + 13X bed is completed. The adsorption and desorption characteristics and performance of double-layered Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + 13X bed, activated carbon bed, K<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> bed in CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption and recovery from wet flue gas are compared. Suggestions about the use of adsorbents in VSA for CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption and recovery from wet flue gas are proposed.</p>
engineering, chemical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?