A traceable and continuous flow calibration method for gaseous elemental mercury at low ambient concentrations

Teodor D. Andron,Warren T. Corns,Igor Živković,Saeed Waqar Ali,Sreekanth Vijayakumaran Nair,Milena Horvat,Horvat, Milena
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1217-2024
IF: 4.184
2024-02-21
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Abstract:The monitoring of low gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) concentrations in the atmosphere requires continuous high-resolution measurements and corresponding calibration capabilities. Currently, continuous calibration for GEM is still an issue at ambient concentrations (1–2 ng m −3 ). This paper presents a continuous flow calibration for GEM, traceable to NIST 3133 Standard Reference Material (SRM). This calibration approach was tested using a direct mercury analyser based on atomic absorption spectrometry with Zeeman background correction (Zeeman AAS). The produced continuous flow of GEM standard was obtained via the reduction of Hg 2+ from liquid NIST 3133 SRM and used for the traceable calibration of the Zeeman AAS device. Measurements of atmospheric GEM using the calibrated Zeeman AAS were compared with two methods: (1) manual gold amalgamation atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS) calibrated with the chemical reduction of NIST 3133 and (2) automated gold amalgamation AFS calibrated using the mercury bell-jar syringe technique. The comparisons showed that a factory-calibrated Zeeman AAS device underestimates concentrations under 10 ng m −3 by up to 35 % relative to the two other methods of determination. However, when a calibration based on NIST 3133 SRM was used to perform a traceable calibration of the Zeeman AAS, the results were more comparable with other methods. The expanded relative combined uncertainty for the Zeeman AAS ranged from 8 % for measurements at the 40 ng m −3 level to 91.6 % for concentrations under 5 ng m −3 using the newly developed calibration system. High uncertainty for measurements performed under 5 ng m −3 was mainly due to instrument noise and concentration variation in the samples.
meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?