Comparison of Reactive Gaseous Mercury Collection by Different Sampling Methods in a Laboratory Test and Field Monitoring

Xiaoge Bu,Hefeng Zhang,Guangkuo Lv,Huiming Lin,Long Chen,Xiufeng Yin,Guofeng Shen,Wen Yuan,Wei Zhang,Xuejun Wang,Yindong Tong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00439

IF: 11.558

2018-01-01

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

Abstract:Accurately measuring reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) concentrations in the atmosphere is important to improve our understanding of the global mercury (Hg) cycle. In this study, we compared the RGM collection efficiencies of four sampling methods, including a 14 cm long KCl-coated denuder, a KCl-coated glass fiber filter, a KCl-coated quartz sand tube, and a cation exchange membrane. Both laboratory studies and field RGM monito ring were performed in environments with low humidity [relative humidity (RH) of similar to 20%], medium humidity (RH of S0-70%), and high humidity (RH of similar to 100%). Laboratory results showed that in environments with <70% RH, RGM amounts collected by the KCl-coated glass fiber filter and the KCl-coated quartz sand tube were comparable with those collected with the cation exchange membrane. In environments with similar to 100% RH, the cation exchange membrane collected more RGM, approximately 1.1-1.4, 1.1-1.2, and 2.4-2.7 times more than the KCl-coated glass fiber filter, KCl-coated quartz sand tube, and KCl-coated denuder, respectively. During field monitoring, RGM amounts collected with the KCl-coated quartz sand tube were comparable to those collected with the cation exchange membrane regardless of the RH in the environment (p > 0.05; n = 60). Large variations (<= 20 during field monitoring) in RGM concentrations measured by different sampling methods indicate the need for a unified and standardized method for future RGM monitoring.