Effect of Fly Ash on the Mass Transfer Performance of CO2 Removal Using MEA and DEA Solutions in a Packed Tower

Wenxia Xie,Chunmin Tu,Jun Zhang,Chengwei Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/separations11010020

2024-01-05

Separations

Abstract:The accumulation of uncollected fly ash from flue gas in post-combustion CO2 capture processes is a significant concern in current coal-fired power plants due to its potential impact on the performance of CO2 absorbent and absorption towers. In order to determine the effect of fly ash on the mass transfer performance of CO2 absorption into monoethanolamine (MEA) and diethanolamine (DEA) aqueous solutions, experimental studies were carried out using a small-sized packed tower equipped with θ-ring random packing. These studies were conducted under various operating parameters, including solution temperature, liquid/gas ratio (L/G), packing height, and fly ash concentration. The results show that the effect of fly ash on the outlet CO2 concentration was primarily observed during the initial stages of the experimental process. Moreover, the presence of fly ash leads to a reduction in the volumetric overall mass transfer coefficient (KGav) when using MEA and DEA solution, and increasing the fly ash concentration further exacerbates this negative impact. However, the effect of fly ash on the reduction in KGav is not significantly related to its chemical composition but rather depends on the operational parameters. With increasing solution temperature, liquid/gas ratio (L/G), and packing height, the KGav values for different solutions exhibit an upward trend. The negative effect of fly ash on KGav remains relatively stable for MEA as solution temperature and packing height increase. Compared to MEA, fly ash has a greater negative effect on DEA solution under the same experimental conditions. The analysis reveals that the detrimental effect of fly ash on KGav primarily stems from its ability to alter the distribution state of the absorption liquid within the packed tower.

chemistry, analytical

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the impact of uncollected fly ash on the performance of carbon dioxide (CO2) absorbents and absorption towers during post-combustion CO2 capture in coal-fired power plants. Specifically, the study aims to determine the effect of fly ash on the mass transfer performance of CO2 absorption using aqueous solutions of monoethanolamine (MEA) and diethanolamine (DEA) in a packed tower.

### Main Research Content:
1. **Experimental Setup**:
- The experimental setup includes a simulated flue gas system, a CO2 reaction system, and an analysis system.
- The reaction system consists of a small packed tower filled with 3 mm × 3 mm stainless steel θ-ring packing.
- The simulated gas is a mixture of nitrogen and CO2, with a fixed CO2 concentration of 14%.

2. **Experimental Methods**:
- Prepared 5% MEA and DEA aqueous solutions with and without fly ash.
- The solutions were heated to the required temperature using a magnetic heating stirrer, ensuring thorough mixing of the solution and fly ash.
- A peristaltic pump was used to evenly distribute the aqueous solution onto the packing column, establishing gas-liquid countercurrent contact.
- The CO2 concentration in the exhaust gas was measured using a flue gas analyzer.

3. **Results and Discussion**:
- **Effect of Fly Ash on CO2 Outlet Concentration**:
- Experimental results showed that the CO2 outlet concentration of MEA and DEA solutions significantly increased after adding fly ash, indicating a negative impact of fly ash on CO2 absorption.
- The impact of fly ash was most evident in the initial stage of the experiment (0-15 minutes) and gradually diminished over time.
- **Effect of Fly Ash on Overall Mass Transfer Coefficient (KGav)**:
- The presence of fly ash led to a reduction in KGav when using MEA and DEA solutions, and higher fly ash concentrations further exacerbated this negative impact.
- Changes in KGav were related to operational parameters (such as solution temperature, liquid-to-gas ratio, packing height) but were not significantly affected by the chemical composition of the fly ash.
- **Comparison of Fly Ash Impact on MEA and DEA Solutions**:
- Under the same experimental conditions, the negative impact of fly ash on DEA solutions was greater than on MEA solutions.
- Analysis indicated that the negative impact of fly ash on KGav was mainly due to changes in the distribution state of the absorption liquid within the packed tower.

### Conclusion:
The study reveals the negative impact of fly ash on the mass transfer performance during the CO2 absorption process, particularly in the initial stage of the experiment. The deposition of fly ash reduces the effective gas-liquid contact area, thereby lowering the overall mass transfer coefficient. These findings help optimize the CO2 capture process in coal-fired power plants by reducing the impact of fly ash on the performance of absorbents.