Probing the Relationship between Anisotropic Magnetoresistance and Magnetization of ferromagnetic films

Wanli Zhang,Jing Chen,Wenxu Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2019.03.005

2018-12-26

Abstract:The anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR) in thin permalloy strips was calculated at each steps during magnetization by the finite element method. The magnetization at equilibrium under different external fields was obtained by micromagnetic simulations, while the resistance with different magnetization was obtained by solving the Poisson equations iteratively until self-consistence. We find that the relation between magnetization and AMR deviates from the Stoner-Wohlfarth prediction when the magnetization is reduced from saturation. The reason is that the demagnetization is not necessarily from coherent rotation of the magnetic moment. We conclude that it is necessary to use numeric simulations to optimize the responses of AMR sensors.

Materials Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How does the relationship between anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR) and magnetization deviate from the prediction of the traditional Stoner - Wohlfarth model in ferromagnetic thin films, especially when the magnetization decreases from the saturation state?**

### Specific problems include:
1. **Relationship between AMR and magnetization**: The traditional Stoner - Wohlfarth model assumes that the coherent rotation of magnetic moments can explain the change in AMR. However, when the magnetization decreases from the saturation state, the actual AMR behavior may be different from the results predicted by this model.
2. **Effect of non - uniform magnetization distribution**: In actual materials, magnetization is not uniform, especially when the sample size exceeds the single - domain standard, domain walls will appear. How does this non - uniform magnetization distribution affect AMR?
3. **Importance of numerical simulation**: In order to accurately describe and optimize the performance of AMR sensors, is it necessary to use numerical simulation methods to consider the complex magnetic moment distribution and current density distribution?

### Research methods:
- Use the finite element method (FEM) combined with micromagnetic simulations to calculate the magnetization state under different applied magnetic fields.
- Obtain the resistance values under different magnetization states by iteratively solving Poisson equations.
- Analyze the relationship between AMR and the average value of the square of the magnetization intensity \(\langle (M_x/M_s)^2 \rangle\) to evaluate its linearity.

### Main findings:
- When the magnetization decreases from the saturation state, the relationship between AMR and magnetization significantly deviates from the prediction of the Stoner - Wohlfarth model.
- This deviation is mainly due to the non - uniformity of the magnetic moment distribution, which leads to the complexity of the current density distribution and is no longer consistent with the direction of the magnetic moment.
- Therefore, in order to optimize the performance of AMR sensors, numerical simulation methods must be used to consider these complex physical effects instead of relying on the simple coherent magnetic moment rotation model.

### Conclusion:
This study emphasizes the importance of jointly solving the Landau - Lifshitz - Gilbert (LLG) equation and Poisson equations in order to more accurately understand and optimize the performance of AMR sensors.

\[
\text{AMR} \propto \langle \cos^2 \theta \rangle
\]
where \(\theta\) is the angle between the magnetic moment and the current density.