Abstract:In the histories formulation of quantum theory, sets of coarse-grained histories, that are called consistent, obey classical probability rules. It has been argued that these sets can describe the semi-classical behaviour of closed quantum systems. Most physical scenarios admit multiple different consistent sets and one can view each consistent set as a separate context. Using propositions from different consistent sets to make inferences leads to paradoxes such as the contrary inferences first noted by Kent [Physical Review Letters, 78(15):2874, 1997]. Proponents of the consistent histories formulation argue that one should not mix propositions coming from different consistent sets in making logical arguments, and that paradoxes such as the aforementioned contrary inferences are nothing else than the usual microscopic paradoxes of quantum contextuality as first demonstrated by Kochen and Specker theorem. In this contribution we use the consistent histories to describe a macroscopic (semi-classical) system to show that paradoxes involving contextuality (mixing different consistent sets) persist even in the semi-classical limit. This is distinctively different from the contextuality of standard quantum theory, where the contextuality paradoxes do not persist in the semi-classical limit. Specifically, we consider different consistent sets for the arrival time of a semi-classical wave packet in an infinite square well. Surprisingly, we get consistent sets that disagree on whether the motion of the semi-classical system, that started within a subregion, ever left that subregion or not. Our results point to the need for constraints, additional to the consistency condition, to recover the correct semi-classical limit in this formalism and lead to the motto `all consistent sets are equal', but `some consistent sets are more equal than others'.

Discussion: Time-Symmetric Quantum Counterfactuals

Time-Symmetrized Counterfactuals in Quantum Theory

Time-Symmetrized Quantum Theory

"Counterfactual" quantum protocols

Consistent quantum counterfactuals

Weak Measurements and Counterfactual Computation

Analysis of counterfactuality of counterfactual communication protocols

Reversibility and Irreversibility within the Quantum Formalism

Time and event symmetry in quantum mechanics

Time symmetry in quantum theories and beyond

Quantum mechanics is compatible with counterfactual definiteness

Counterfactual Reasoning, Realism and Quantum Mechanics: Much Ado About Nothing?

Time-Symmetric Resolutions of the Renninger Negative-Result Paradoxes

Comment on "Protocol for Direct Counterfactual Quantum Communication" [<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1206.2042" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2042">arXiv:1206.2042</a>]

Quantum Scholasticism: On Quantum Contexts, Counterfactuals, and the Absurdities of Quantum Omniscience

On unorthodox qubits, with an application to the closed timelike curve problem

Counterfactual Analysis by Algorithmic Complexity: A metric between possible worlds

Does quantum mechanics require "conspiracy"?

Logical difficulty from combining counterfactuals in the GHZ-Bell theorems

Contrary Inferences for Classical Histories within the Consistent Histories Formulation of Quantum Theory