Abstract:Deliberation about what to do in any context requires reasoning about what will or would happen in various alternative situations, including situations that the agent knows will never in fact be realized. In contexts that involve two or more agents who have to take account of each others’ deliberation, the counterfactual reasoning may become quite complex. When I deliberate, I have to consider not only what the causal effects would be of alternative choices that I might make, but also what other agents might believe about the potential effects of my choices, and how their alternative possible actions might affect my beliefs. Counter factual possibilities are implicit in the models that game theorists and decision theorists have developed – in the alternative branches in the trees that model extensive form games and the different cells of the matrices of strategic form representations – but much of the reasoning about those possibilities remains in the informal commentary on and motivation for the models developed. Puzzlement is sometimes expressed by game theorists about the relevance of what happens in a game ‘off the equilibrium path’: of what would happen if what is (according to the theory) both true and known by the players to be true were instead false. My aim in this paper is to make some suggestions for clarifying some of the concepts involved in counterfactual reasoning in strategic contexts, both the reasoning of the rational agents being modeled, and the reasoning of the theorist who is doing the modeling, and to bring together some ideas and technical tools developed by philosophers and logicians that I think might be relevant to the analysis of strategic reasoning, and more generally to the conceptual foundations of game theory.

Counterfactual Analysis by Algorithmic Complexity: A metric between possible worlds

Counterfactuals Modulo Temporal Logics

Counterfactual and Semifactual Explanations in Abstract Argumentation: Formal Foundations, Complexity and Computation

Analysis of counterfactuality of counterfactual communication protocols

Counterfactual Causality from First Principles?

Causal counterfactuals without miracles or backtracking

Counterfactuals and Backtracking Counterfactuals

Consistent quantum counterfactuals

Discussion: Time-Symmetric Quantum Counterfactuals

What Counterfactuals Can Be Tested

Three approaches for analyzing the counterfactuality of counterfactual protocols

Counterfactual Conditionals in Quantified Modal Logic

Longitudinal Counterfactuals: Constraints and Opportunities

A Semantics for Counterfactuals in Quantum Causal Models

Knowledge, Belief and Counterfactual Reasoning in Games

From the Closed Classical Algorithmic Universe to an Open World of Algorithmic Constellations

Choose your Data Wisely: A Framework for Semantic Counterfactuals

Algorithmic Idealism II: Reassessment of Competing Theories

On Counterfactual Reasoning

The Logic of Counterfactuals and the Epistemology of Causal Inference

Possible Worlds Semantics: A Research Program That Cannot Fail?