Abstract:We first consider the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox for the system of two particles with spin 1/2 with entangled spins in first-quantized quantum mechanics (QM). If measurement is governed by wavefunction collapse, then gedanken experiments show that a number of fundamental principles including conservation of angular momentum and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle can be violated. We conclude that the collapse of the spin part of the wavefunction cannot happen and therefore an EPR paradox does not arise for this system. QM unitarity alone is sufficient to rule out "spooky" action at a distance. The absence of spin wavefunction collapse leads to several interesting conclusions about how measurement works in QM: When wavefunction collapse does not happen, (i) a signal from a macroscopic measuring device indicating that a system is in a state S does not necessarily mean that it is or was in S and (ii) the uncertainty in QM at the microscopic level is transmitted to uncertainty in signals for the macroscopic measuring device. We derive two general results on how quantum measurement works and illustrate them in a spin-1/2 measurement. In contrast to first-quantized QM, in quantum field theory we are unable to fully rule out the possibility of wavefunction collapse. However, when we insist on unitarity (thereby excluding the possibility of wavefunction collapse) and additionally take into account in the wavefunction all degrees of freedom involved in the measurement (including those of the equipment, experimentalists, etc.), a consistant acceptable understanding of the Bell-inequality-type experiments involving entangled photon polarizations emerges including the absence of an EPR paradox. The ability of an experimentalist to be aware of his perceptions but unable to be conscious of other components of a generalized Schrodinger Cat plays a role in resolving the Measurement Problem.

Time-Symmetric Resolutions of the Renninger Negative-Result Paradoxes

Comment on Frauchiger and Renner paper (Nat. Commun. 9, 3711 (2018)): the problem of stopping times

Schrödinger's Cheshire Cat: A tabletop experiment to measure the Diósi-Penrose collapse time and demonstrate Objective Reduction (OR)

Quantum reality with negative-mass particles

Irreversible Diagonalization of Mechanical Quantities and the EPR Paradox

On a paradox in quantum mechanics and its resolution

Reversibility and Irreversibility within the Quantum Formalism

Perspectives on the quantum Zeno paradox

Association between quantum paradoxes based on weak values and a realistic interpretation of quantum measurements

Breaking a Combinatorial Symmetry Resolves the Paradox of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen and Bell

On Wavefunction Collapse, the Einstein-Poldolsky-Rosen Paradox and Measurement in Quantum Mechanics and Field Theory

Realigned Hardy's Paradox

No Paradox in Wave-Particle Duality

Thinking twice inside the box: is Wigner's friend really quantum?

Interaction-Free Effects Between Distant Atoms

The Frauchiger-Renner Gedanken Experiment: Flaws in Its Analysis -- How Logic Works in Quantum Mechanics

Realigned Hardy’s paradox

on some (so-called) paradoxes of quantum physics

Conditional probabilities of measurements, quantum time and the Wigner's friend case

On the negative-result experiments in quantum mechanics

Time and event symmetry in quantum mechanics