Abstract:Choice of articulating materials, head size and the design of the articulation will become decisive for the long-term performance of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) and especially in terms of risk for dislocation and wear-related problems. Here we account for common alternatives based on available studies and the evidence that can be derived from them.Metal or ceramic femoral heads articulating against a liner or cup made of highly cross-linked polyethylene and ceramic-on-ceramic articulations have about similar risk for complications leading to revision, whereas the performance of metal-on-metal articulations, especially with use of big heads, is inferior. The clinical significance of problems related to ceramic-on-ceramic articulations such as squeaking remains unclear. With use of current technology ceramic fractures are rare.Large femoral heads have the potential to increase the range of hip movement before impingement occurs and are therefore expected to reduce dislocation rates. On the other hand, issues related to bearing wear, corrosion at the taper-trunnion junction and groin pain may arise with larger heads and jeopardize the longevity of THA. Based on current knowledge, 32-mm heads seem to be optimal for metal-on-polyethylene bearings. Patients with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings may benefit from even larger heads such as 36 or 40 mm, but so far there are no long-term reports that confirm the safety of bearings larger than 36 mm.Assessment of lipped liners is difficult because randomized studies are lacking, but retrospective clinical studies and registry data seem to indicate that this liner modification will reduce the rate of dislocation or revision due to dislocation without clear evidence of clinically obvious problems due to neck-liner impingement.The majority of studies support the view that constrained liners and dual mobility cups (DMC) will reduce the risk of revision due to dislocation both in primary and revision THA, the latter gaining increasing popularity in some countries. Both these devices suffer from implant-specific problems, which seem to be more common for the constrained liner designs. The majority of studies of these implants suffer from various methodological problems, not least selection bias, which calls for randomized studies preferably in a multi-centre setting to obtain sufficient power. In the 2020s, the orthopaedic profession should place more effort on such studies, as has already been achieved within other medical specialties, to improve the level of evidence in the choice of articulation when performing one of the most common in-hospital surgical procedures in Europe. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:763-775. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200002.

A Very Rare Form of Ceramic Head Fracture in Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty: Unique Experience and Literature Review

Non-contemporaneous bilateral stem fractures occurring after staged bilateral hip revision using extensively porous-coated cylindrical femoral stems: a case report

Severe Wear and multiple Pseudotumor formation due to revision for ceramic head breakage after ceramic-on-ceramic Total hip arthroplasty: a case report

Ceramic fragmentation after total hip arthroplasty: two case reports and literature review

Intraoperative Dissociation and Migration of the Trial Bipolar Cup in Hip Hemiarthroplasty: A Rare Case

Analysis of Bipolar Femoral Head Replacement for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly:A Report of 104 Cases

Use of ceramics in total hip replacement

An Atypical Adverse Local Tissue Reaction After Ceramic-on-Ceramic Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

A multi-center retrospective comparative study of third generation Ceramic-on- Ceramic total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 45 years with or without the sandwich liner: A ten-year minimum

Long-term follow-up of total hip arthroplasty using polyethylene-ceramic composite (sandwich) liner

Concerns about Ceramics in THA

Premature failure of a hip hemiarthroplasty secondary to osteolysis and aseptic loosening

Pure Alumina Bearings with Cementless Stems Versus Sandwich Bearings with Cemented Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Polyethylene liner dissociation in cementless total hip arthroplasty: Ensuring accurate diagnosis

Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty:No squeaking in 228 hips

Bilateral simultaneous metal inlay dissociation from the polyethylene liner of a metal-on-metal hip replacement

Femoral Head Perforation After Primary Hip Arthroplasty: Unseen Complication of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Interface: A Case Report

Global diversity in bearings in primary THA

Polyethylene liner fracture in dual mobility trapeziometacarpal total joint replacement: how to make a timely diagnosis?

Ceramic on ceramic arthroplasty of the hip: new materials confirm appropriate use in young patients

Why Are Contemporary Primary Ceramic-on-Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasties Failing? An Analysis of Over 5,500 Cases