Abstract:Choice of articulating materials, head size and the design of the articulation will become decisive for the long-term performance of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) and especially in terms of risk for dislocation and wear-related problems. Here we account for common alternatives based on available studies and the evidence that can be derived from them.Metal or ceramic femoral heads articulating against a liner or cup made of highly cross-linked polyethylene and ceramic-on-ceramic articulations have about similar risk for complications leading to revision, whereas the performance of metal-on-metal articulations, especially with use of big heads, is inferior. The clinical significance of problems related to ceramic-on-ceramic articulations such as squeaking remains unclear. With use of current technology ceramic fractures are rare.Large femoral heads have the potential to increase the range of hip movement before impingement occurs and are therefore expected to reduce dislocation rates. On the other hand, issues related to bearing wear, corrosion at the taper-trunnion junction and groin pain may arise with larger heads and jeopardize the longevity of THA. Based on current knowledge, 32-mm heads seem to be optimal for metal-on-polyethylene bearings. Patients with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings may benefit from even larger heads such as 36 or 40 mm, but so far there are no long-term reports that confirm the safety of bearings larger than 36 mm.Assessment of lipped liners is difficult because randomized studies are lacking, but retrospective clinical studies and registry data seem to indicate that this liner modification will reduce the rate of dislocation or revision due to dislocation without clear evidence of clinically obvious problems due to neck-liner impingement.The majority of studies support the view that constrained liners and dual mobility cups (DMC) will reduce the risk of revision due to dislocation both in primary and revision THA, the latter gaining increasing popularity in some countries. Both these devices suffer from implant-specific problems, which seem to be more common for the constrained liner designs. The majority of studies of these implants suffer from various methodological problems, not least selection bias, which calls for randomized studies preferably in a multi-centre setting to obtain sufficient power. In the 2020s, the orthopaedic profession should place more effort on such studies, as has already been achieved within other medical specialties, to improve the level of evidence in the choice of articulation when performing one of the most common in-hospital surgical procedures in Europe. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:763-775. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200002.

Polyethylene liner fracture in dual mobility trapeziometacarpal total joint replacement: how to make a timely diagnosis?

Polyethylene liner dissociation in cementless total hip arthroplasty: Ensuring accurate diagnosis

Polyethylene liner dissociation in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective case-control study on a single implant design

A Unique Variant of Intra-Prosthetic Dislocation in Dual Mobility Articulation Total Hip Arthroplasty—Displacement of Metal Liner

Ceramic fragmentation after total hip arthroplasty: two case reports and literature review

Dual mobility hip arthroplasty: iatrogenic intraprosthetic dislocation of a 22 mm head

Arthroscopic-assisted Treatment of a Posterolateral Tibial Plateau Fracture with an Accompanying Tibial Eminence Fracture. Case Report

Measurement of polyethylene wear and its clinical significance in total hip arthroplasty

Long-term follow-up of total hip arthroplasty using polyethylene-ceramic composite (sandwich) liner

Severe Wear and multiple Pseudotumor formation due to revision for ceramic head breakage after ceramic-on-ceramic Total hip arthroplasty: a case report

Analysis of Finite Element Modeling on Elasto-Plasticity of Polyethylene Liner under Contact Stress after THA

Early Definitive Fixation of an Open Periprosthetic Femur Fracture in the Polytraumatized Patient: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Challenges in Residual Bearing Removal: A Rare Case of Mobile Bearing Fracture in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with Literature Review

Bilateral simultaneous metal inlay dissociation from the polyethylene liner of a metal-on-metal hip replacement

A multi-center retrospective comparative study of third generation Ceramic-on- Ceramic total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 45 years with or without the sandwich liner: A ten-year minimum

Polyethylene wear and osteolysis in H/G cementless total hip arthroplasty]

Revolutionizing PIP joint fracture treatment: A case of surgical precision and rapid recovery

A Very Rare Form of Ceramic Head Fracture in Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty: Unique Experience and Literature Review

Treatment of Recurrent Total Hip Arthroplasty Dislocation Caused by Distorted Proximal Femoral Anatomy Due to a Previously Healed Trochanteric Fracture

Global diversity in bearings in primary THA

Fretting Corrosion, Third-Body Polyethylene Damage, and Cup Positioning in Primary vs Revision Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty