The Problem of the Nature of the Athenian Democracy in the 4th Century B.C. in the Modern German Historiography

Lyudmila R. Rotermel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24147/2312-1300.2023.10(3).38-47

2023-01-01

Abstract:The author analyzes the debating points in the study of the Athenian democracy in the 4th century B.C. by the modern German classical studies. Although historians have rejected the view according to which the Athenian democracy reached its zenith in the second half of the 5th century B.C., followed by a decay after the Peloponnesian war, the nature of the Athenian democracy in the 4th century is still under debate. The German researchers mainly focus on the following issues: was the 4th century a qualitatively new stage in the development of the Athenian democracy, or was the Athenian democracy uniform throughout the whole classic period; this raises a question of the correlation between ecclesia and heliaia; can we say that the supremacy of Demos in the 4th century gives way to the supremacy of law? The article focuses on the works that research the institutional aspect of the Athenian democracy since it appears to be crucial for discussing the problem of the nature of the Athenian democracy in the 4th century. The views of the German researchers, whose works were analyzed in the article, can be summarized as the following theses. Demos exercised direct dominance through ecclesia and heliaia and maintained control over the law making process. At the same time, the researchers acknowledge the significant changes in the political system of the Athenian democracy, the main purpose of which was to enhance its protection from any internal and external threats. Although law started to play a more important role for the polis in the 4th century, we cannot admit that the supremacy of law was established: in the end, departing from the law to protect the democratic order was not only permitted but also considered rightful.