Abstract:Cicero represents the efforts by the Roman philosophers who tried to create their own philosophy by means of re-reading Greek philosophy. The new Roman philosophy exhibits its own originality which differs from the Greek one and is more akin to modern philosophical thinking. Thus more attention should be directed to this much-neglected style of wisdom.In Hellenistic-Roman philosophies, one interesting phenomenon can be observed: many have passed over Plato and Aristotle and traced back to Socrates in order to re-find the ″orthodoxy″ of philosophy. Stoics did that, and so did the Academics. Cicero played his role in this line of Socratic-orthodoxy discovery. When Cicero claimed that Socrates was the first man who turned philosophy from heaven to the city, he was not just describing some ordinary ″philosophical turn″, rather, he was pointing out the real nature of philosophy: to be the reflection on politics and the moral good.The philosophy school that followed this orthodoxy, as Cicero believed, was the Academic philosophers who pursued ″probable truth″ rather than absolute truth.The former was attained through dialectic examination of opinions and thus belonged eventually in the domain of opinion, sufficient, however, to guide life, while the latter was not attainable and useless to life.Probable truth is the truth that has reasonable apology or justification. This wording reminds people of a forensic rhetoric. Actually, rhetoric politics is another part of the new feature of Roman philosophy founded by Cicero. Rhetoric aims at persuasion.Greek philosophers like Socrates and Plato criticized rhetoric art fiercely because it did not resort to truth. Plato did have his own art of speaking, namely dialectics. But Cicero emphasized more on the public speech in the court and the senate, for it brought benefits for the commonwealth. Roman republican philosophers believed that philosophy must serve the real reforms in political life, rather than the mere theoretical perfection.The change of focus on probable truth and public rhetoric entails other profound changes in the philosophical thinking. For instance, Cicero re-ordered the Telos in favor of the life-form of practical statesmen, rather than that of speculative philosophers. Meanwhile, he stressed more on the internal relation between natural law and custom, avoiding the idealistic orientation in the justification of moral norms.Cicero’s contribution is significant, for since then both Greek idealistic philosophy and Roman rhetoric philosophy have constituted distinct and coexistent sub-traditions within the Western tradition of political philosophy.

Legal expertise and legal experts in Athenian democracy

On Suggestion of Expert in Justice

The Greek Polis and the Rule of Law in the Western Tradition

Pausanias Politicus: Reflections on Theseus, Themistocles, and Athenian Democracy in Book 1 of the Periegesis

The Problem of the Nature of the Athenian Democracy in the 4th Century B.C. in the Modern German Historiography

Exile, Ostracism and the Athenian Democracy

The use of discourse expertise to control the provision of legal services and establish discursive hegemony in commercial law practice: a case study from Europe

Participation and Rights in Athenian Democracy: A Habermasian Approach

Prediction, Precision, and Practical Experience: the Hippocratics on technē

Corruption

Legal Analogies in Cicero's Political Thought

Cultural Expertise and Socio-legal Studies: Introduction

PARRHESIA, PHAEDRA, AND THE POLIS: ANTICIPATING PSYCHOANALYTIC FREE ASSOCIATION AS DEMOCRATIC PRACTICE

When I use a word . . . Purely academic

The Trial of Socrates Like the Struggle of Sophistry and Dialectics

Training showmanship rhetoric in Greek medical education of the fifth and fourth centuries BC

Elements of logic, rhetoric and eristic for expert witnesses giving oral opinions at court hearings

Cicero on Socrates

“I Was Following Orders”: An Ancient Greek Archetype of Modern War Crime Legislation

The Expert Testimony System in Anglo-American Evidence Law

“Justice is Happiness”?—an Analysis of Plato’s Strategies in Response to Challenges from the Sophists