Prediction, Precision, and Practical Experience: the Hippocratics on technē

Joel E. Mann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.2008.41.2.89
2008-06-01
Abstract:It would be diffi cult to overestimate the thematic importance of techne in classical Greek philosophy. In particular, the nature of techne, art or expertise, as well as the question of what counts as a techne, was of paramount importance to Plato, who in the Gorgias and elsewhere waged a war against rhetoric on the grounds that it was not a techne at all but a stochastic competence derived from empeiria, that is, from practical experience. Isocrates, a teacher of rhetoric and Plato’s rival heir to the Socratic mantle, defended his profession’s claim to technical status by arguing for the adequacy of empeiria and ridiculing the search for precise knowledge of virtue. Further complicating matters, traces of classical disputes over techne are evident also in the Hippocratic Corpus, especially in works such as On the art, Ancient medicine, Nature of man, and Regimen in acute diseases. Scholars are in general agreement about the situation of these medical writers in the burgeoning debate over techne. The Standard Story runs as follows. Just as Plato demoted rhetoric because it did not meet certain ‘rationalist’ requirements, so, too, did some anonymous antagonists seek to dismiss medicine or certain medical theories from the canon of technai for the failure of physicians
Philosophy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?