Abstract:Abstract Hannah Arendt has developed a theory of the importance of judgment of taste for political manners, founded on the Kantian aesthetic theory. Nowadays this theory is considered a current theoretical reference for establishing a political way to reconcile the demands of the radicalization of deliberative democracy with the need for political inclusion (Iris Marion Young, Seyla Benhabib). Albena Azmanova in her The Scandal of Reason: A Critical Theory of Political Judgment proposes an inclusive political rhetoric. The political theory founded on judgment is based on Kant’s philosophy; it was developed by Arendt and has greatly influenced the current debate, as an alternative theory in which the moral basis of law can be more sensitive to human contexts; a universalist theory more adequate for dealing with the tragic dimension of human life. The theory of political judgment uses the concepts of reflective judgment and ‘enlarged thought’ as its main concepts. As a starting point, a theory like this considers the singular judgments of justice that each person makes. The background, therefore, is not a rational foundation of principles, but the capacity of rational beings to make judgments. This post-metaphysical theory of law, based on a theory of judgment, is a critique of legal positivism, but presents itself as an alternative to the idealistic theory of law. But this theoretical project has received some criticism related to the adequacy of Arendt’s rereading of Kantian philosophy and her attempt to approximate Kant’s reflective judgment to the Aristotelian concept of phronêsis. Some critics, such as Bryan Garsten, believe that Kant’s rhetoric of public reason diminished and displaced the prudential faculty of judgment that Arendt is to be interested in reviving. Arendt’s attempt to find a theory of judgment in Kant’s aesthetic theory is not successful, in Garsten’s view. Our purpose is to show that a critical theory of judicial judgment is not only possible, but necessary; Arendt’s theory of judgment offers an important contribution to a critical theory of judicial judgment, particularly one devoted to the construction of a legal theory that prioritizes a politics of social inclusion. This theory proposes a critical approach to the project of the procedural conception of democracy, since it can mask social exclusion. An adequate understanding of judicial argumentation cannot forget that it happens in a rhetorical context: it is not only important what a discourse says, but how it says it. The radicalization of deliberative democracy supposes a revision of the ways judicial deliberation is thought: not by reference to universal or at least general principles, but taking into consideration what is ‘critically relevant’, with a view to remedying social injustice (following Azmanova).

PARRHESIA, PHAEDRA, AND THE POLIS: ANTICIPATING PSYCHOANALYTIC FREE ASSOCIATION AS DEMOCRATIC PRACTICE

Participation and Rights in Athenian Democracy: A Habermasian Approach

The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis

Erich Fromm: Ancestor of Social Psychoanalytic Practice

Hannah Arendt: Athens or Perhaps Jerusalem?

A Discussion with Public Officials on Justice and Happiness -An Interpretation of Plato's Gorgias

Symposium 5: Athenian Democracy & Networked Learning Communities

The Problem of the Nature of the Athenian Democracy in the 4th Century B.C. in the Modern German Historiography

Transforming psychoanalysis for the public

Freedom in the free world: The extimate becomes the law

[Psychoanalysis and engagement: Otto Fenichel and the political Freudians]

"Psychoanalysts are always at the same time doctors and patients and can be cured as doctors." An analysis of Karl Kraus's antipsychoanalytic aphorisms (1905-1930)

Reflective Judgement and Prudential Rationality: A Contribution to an Inclusive Practical Application of Law

Afraid to Commit: Proposing Psychoanalysis and the Paradox of the Analyst's Desire

The Most Hysterical Psychoanalyst

In This Issue, Psychoanalytic Dialogues 34-5

How Erich Fromm Can Help Address the Jordan Peterson Problem in Psychoanalysis

Psychoanalysis—More Than a Profession: Presidential Address, American Psychoanalytic Association, New York, February 3, 2023

Law and psychoanalysis: close intertwining between Hans Kelsen and Sigmund Freud

Social Justice Activism as Interpretation in a Loewaldian World

Psychoanalysis and politics