Abstract:The Athenian democracy is worthy of study if for no other reason than that it was inspiration for many academic fields. This project highlights some institutions and policies of the Athenian democracy, during its flowering in the fifth and fourth centuries BC, in order to interpret them for the benefits of networked learning communities. Concepts such as ephebes and the power of reward can be applied to both the ancient and digital era, without implying an exact parallel. New members (ephebes) need training to create their e-portfolios, acquire digital literacy and epistemic fluency to be eligible to contribute to and benefit from community management. Discussion forums could be an arena for dialogue and information exchange. Allocating labor, e-community managers could fulfill the potential of technology-enhanced learning and tutors would able to select and distribute resources that could be useful and applicable. Praxis and democratic ideals are mirrored in the framework of an economy of knowledge. Epistemologically speaking, an economy of knowledge can be seen as a theory for acquiring the full benefits and costs of coming to know and use knowledge. This theory of knowledge could be a core concept in network learning. This theory does not presume full knowledge, but it does presume democratic social construction of knowledge. On ontological grounds, subjectivity implies that there are always some alternative constructions available to choose from in dealing with the world. The reliability of democracy increases as different points of views transformed into a socially ‘agreed’ way of interaction and participation. The dark side of democracy more closely related to NL communities could shade mainly the ideas of irrational decision, monoculture (single, homogeneous culture without diversity) and demagogy. To illuminate dark corners of democratic e-communities, a form of ‘aristocratic democracy’ is used as a metaphor for the social regime. The term, aristocracy, in the Greek sense of the word, means that the best rules in every domain. To top it all, cultural pluralism could light democratic e-communities, with creativity or conflict that can promote critical thinking and dialogue.Praxis and further research are required to test the validity of the theory presented.

Athenian democracy and its critics

The perpetual immigrant and the limits of Athenian democracy

Classical Athenian Democracy and Democracy Today: Culture, Knowledge, Power

How ‘demos’ met ‘cracy’: debt, inequality, money

Participation and Rights in Athenian Democracy: A Habermasian Approach

The Problem of the Nature of the Athenian Democracy in the 4th Century B.C. in the Modern German Historiography

Democracies restricting democratic rights: some classical sources and implications for ethics of biometrics

Exile, Ostracism and the Athenian Democracy

Inequality, Recognition, Irrationalism and Populism. From liberal Democracy and the democratic Rule of Law to post-Democracy. Two crucial historical moments and their consequences: 1945 and 1989/91

The Theory of the “Athenian Revolution” and the Construction of the Classical Athenian Political System

Democratic Politics in Ancient and Modern Times

Symposium 5: Athenian Democracy & Networked Learning Communities

What's Wrong with Democracy? The Peculiar Power of Kratos

The Greek Polis and the Rule of Law in the Western Tradition

What’s Wrong with Democracy? The Peculiar Power of Kratos

Anti-Ethnic Hegemony, Identity Construction and Political Complicities

Aristotle’s Two Cities: Reducing Diversity to Homogeneity

Pausanias Politicus: Reflections on Theseus, Themistocles, and Athenian Democracy in Book 1 of the Periegesis

Featured Articles : Elites and Elitism in American Democracy ; Concepts of Democracy and Elitism in American Intellectual History

Does Dewey Have an “epistemic argument” for Democracy?

What Globalization Overshadows