Abstract:Purpose: To prospectively evaluate peri-implant bone and soft tissue dimension changes around adjacent implants placed at different horizontal interimplant distances. Materials and methods: Thirty partially edentulous patients, who underwent rehabilitation with two adjacent implant-supported crowns as part of their treatment plan, were assigned to three groups based on their prosthetic needs. Patients in group A (10 patients, 20 implants) were to have two implants placed at a 2-mm interimplant distance, patients in group B (10 patients, 20 implants) were to have two implants placed at a 3-mm interimplant distance, and patients in group C (10 patients, 20 implants) were to have two implants placed at an interimplant distance of > 4 mm according to their prosthetic needs. All patients received single-crown restorations after 3 months. Clinical examinations were performed at the time of crown placement (T3), and 6 months (T6), 12 months (T12), and 24 months (T24) after implant placement. Peri-implant bone levels were assessed radiographically at the time of implant placement (T0), and at T3, T12, and T24. Results: One patient from group C did not return for follow-up examinations after implant placement. The mean (± standard deviation) horizontal interimplant distance was 1.97 ± 0.44 mm for implants in group A, 3.12 ± 0.15 mm for implants in group B, and 5.3 ± 0.64 mm for implants in group C. For group A, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.29 ± 0.51 mm at the T0-T3 interval, 0.31 ± 0.36 mm at the T0-T12 interval, and 0.27 ± 0.33 mm at the T0-T24 interval. For group B, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.16 ± 0.29 mm at the T0-T3 interval, 0.20 ± 0.28 mm at the T0-T12 interval, and 0.23 ± 0.28 mm at the T0-T24 interval. For group C, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.51 ± 0.84 mm at the T0-T3 interval, 0.45 ± 0.72 mm at the T0-T12 interval, and 0.44 ± 0.74 mm at the T0-T24 interval. For group A, the mean midproximal bone loss was 0.33 ± 0.50 mm at the T0-T3 interval, 0.45 ± 0.35 mm at the T0-T12 interval, and 0.40 ± 0.32 mm at the T0-T24 interval. For group B, the mean midproximal loss was 0.31 ± 0.37 mm at the T0-T3 interval, 0.32 ± 0.39 mm at the T0-T12 interval, and 0.33 ± 0.42 mm at the T0-T24 interval. For group C, the mean midproximal bone loss was 0.40 ± 0.44 mm at the T0-T3 interval and 0.41 ± 0.50 mm at both the T0-T12 and T0-T24 intervals. There were no statistically significant differences in marginal and midproximal bone crest loss between the different groups at any time point. Conclusion: The study failed to support the hypothesis that horizontal interimplant distance has an effect on peri-implant bone and soft tissue dimension changes for implants with internal conical implant-abutment interface connection and platform-switching characteristics.

Does crown-to-implant ratio affect marginal bone loss around a single short implant at the posterior of the mandible?

Retrospective Study of Short Versus Standard Posterior Implants and Analysis of Implant Failure Risk Factors

Implant Survival Rate and Marginal Bone Loss with the All-on-4 Immediate-Loading Strategy: A Clinical Retrospective Study with 1 to 4 Years of Follow-Up.

Influence of crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic designs on the clinical conditions of short implants in posterior regions: A 4-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study.

Marginal Bone Loss of Tissue- or Bone-Level Implants after Simultaneous Guided Bone Regeneration in the Posterior Mandibular Region: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Analysis of Implant Loss Risk Factors after Simultaneous Guided Bone Regeneration: A Retrospective Study of 5404 Dental Implants

Effect of Initial Biologic Width on Crestal Bone Loss‐ a Clinical Retrospective Study of 1–5 Years

Outcomes That May Affect Implant and Prosthesis Survival and Complications in Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis Supported by Four or Six Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Clinical Evaluation of Short and Wide-Diameter Implants Immediately Placed into Extraction Sockets of Posterior Areas: A 2-Year Retrospective Study

Survival and Complication Rates of Short Implants‐supported Single Crowns in the Posterior Regions with High Crown‐implant Ration (C I)‐ A 10‐year Retrospective Study

The Effect of Initial Biologic Width on Marginal Bone Loss: A Retrospective Study.

CT-based dentulous mandibular alveolar ridge measurements as predictors of crown-to-implant ratio for short and extra short dental implants

Effect of short implant crown-to-implant ratio on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration rates

Retrospective Study on the Clinical Outcomes of Small-Diameter Implants Supporting Fixed Prostheses Without Bone Augmentation in the Posterior Region after 2 to 12 Years

Prosthetic emergence angle in different implant sites and their correlation with marginal bone loss: A retrospective study

Assessment of Peri-Implant Soft Tissues Conditions around Short and Ultra-Short Implant-Supported Single Crowns: A 3-Year Retrospective Study on Periodontally Healthy Patients and Patients with a History of Periodontal Disease

The Effect of Interimplant Distance on Peri-implant Bone and Soft Tissue Dimensional Changes: A Nonrandomized, Prospective, 2-Year Follow-up Study

Long-term outcomes of short dental implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: a clinical retrospective study of 5-10 years.

Factors Influencing Early Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants Positioned Subcrestally: A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Study

Are short implants (≤8.5 mm) reliable in the rehabilitation of completely edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparison of the success rate and marginal bone loss of implants placed simultaneously with either bone expansion or ridge splitting in maxillary sites: a prospective non-randomized study