Abstract:Purpose To investigate the long‐term implant survival rate and marginal bone loss (MBL) of implants with different variables associated over an observational period of at least 20 years. Materials and Methods Patients with at least one implant placed prior to 2001 were recalled and visited. Data on implant macro‐design, prosthetic aspects, site distribution, and patient‐related factors were collected. MBL was evaluated on intraoral X‐rays and peri‐implant soft tissue parameters were recorded. The patients were asked to fill out a questionnaire to evaluate their satisfaction with the treatment received. Descriptive statistics indicators were estimated. Analysis of variance and analysis of covariance models were used to investigate any differences in the MBL and peri‐implant probing depth (PPD) among the variables. A chi‐square analysis was performed to investigate any association between different types of prosthetic implant‐supported rehabilitations and survival/success outcomes. Results Forty‐one (41) patients and 174 implants were included with a mean observational period of 23.3 ± 2.8 years. The implant survival and success rates were 96.5% and 83.3% respectively, while 3.5% of early failures were detected. The lowest success rates were observed for implants supporting fixed full‐arch rehabilitations (71.05%) and overdenture rehabilitations (86.11%). A mean MBL of 1.81 ± 0.71 mm and a mean PPD of 3.38 ± 1.62 mm were recorded. The interaction between the collected data with MBL and PPD did not reveal any statistically significant differences between the variables (p > 0.05). A statistically significant difference was recorded when analyzing the association between the different types of prosthetic implant‐supported rehabilitations and success rates (p = 0.014), with fixed and removable full‐arch rehabilitations presenting with lower success rates. Answers to the questionnaire showed a generally high level of satisfaction. Conclusions Within the limits of this retrospective study and based on the results, an implant survival rate higher than 96% was observed after a mean observational period of 23.3 ± 2.8 years. Both the implant survival rate and MBL seemed stable after a mean observational period of 23.3 ± 2.8 years. Implants supporting fixed and removable full‐arch rehabilitations seemed to present lower success rates over time. Implant rehabilitation seemed to provide patients with optimal long‐term outcomes in terms of functional and psychological aspects.

Retrospective Study on the Clinical Outcomes of Small-Diameter Implants Supporting Fixed Prostheses Without Bone Augmentation in the Posterior Region after 2 to 12 Years

Clinical Evaluation of Short and Wide-Diameter Implants Immediately Placed into Extraction Sockets of Posterior Areas: A 2-Year Retrospective Study

Retrospective Study of Short Versus Standard Posterior Implants and Analysis of Implant Failure Risk Factors

Retrospective study on the clinical outcomes of small-diameter implants supporting fixed prostheses without bone augmentation in the posterior region after two to twelve years

Outcomes That May Affect Implant and Prosthesis Survival and Complications in Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis Supported by Four or Six Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Long-term outcomes of narrow diameter implants in posterior jaws: A retrospective study with at least 8-year follow-up.

Retrospective study on the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 2.8 mm diameter implants supporting fixed prostheses up to 11 years

Long-term outcomes of short dental implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: a clinical retrospective study of 5-10 years.

Use of narrow-diameter implants in the posterior segments of the jaws: A retrospective observational study of 2 to 11 years

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Short Locking-Taper Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Region: A 12-Year Retrospective Study.

A Prospective, Multicentre Study of 6-Mm Short Implants in Posterior Alveolar Bone Supporting Splinted Crowns: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study.

Influence of crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic designs on the clinical conditions of short implants in posterior regions: A 4-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study.

Clinical Evaluation of Narrow-Diameter Implants Versus Standard-Diameter Implants with Lateral Bone Augmentation in Posterior Jaws: Three-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Implant survival rate and marginal bone loss of 174 implants with different variables associated over a minimum observational period of 20 years: A retrospective study

Four‐mm‐short implants in the rehabilitation of posterior atrophic jaws: A retrospective study on 212 patients with a mean follow‐up of 8.02 years

A preliminary clinical study on small-diameter implants

Intermediate Long-Term Clinical Performance of Dental Implants Placed in Sites with a Previous Early Implant Failure: a Retrospective Analysis.

A prospective, multi-center study assessing early loading with short implants in posterior regions. A 3-year post-loading follow-up study.

Long-term clinical outcomes of short implant (6mm) in relation to Implant Disease Risk Assessment (IDRA).

Implant Survival and Complication Prevalence in Complete-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Study with a Mean Follow-up of 5 Years.

Short Versus Longer Implants with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation for Moderately Atrophic Posterior Maxillae: A 1-Year Randomized Clinical Trial.