Abstract:Purpose To investigate the long‐term implant survival rate and marginal bone loss (MBL) of implants with different variables associated over an observational period of at least 20 years. Materials and Methods Patients with at least one implant placed prior to 2001 were recalled and visited. Data on implant macro‐design, prosthetic aspects, site distribution, and patient‐related factors were collected. MBL was evaluated on intraoral X‐rays and peri‐implant soft tissue parameters were recorded. The patients were asked to fill out a questionnaire to evaluate their satisfaction with the treatment received. Descriptive statistics indicators were estimated. Analysis of variance and analysis of covariance models were used to investigate any differences in the MBL and peri‐implant probing depth (PPD) among the variables. A chi‐square analysis was performed to investigate any association between different types of prosthetic implant‐supported rehabilitations and survival/success outcomes. Results Forty‐one (41) patients and 174 implants were included with a mean observational period of 23.3 ± 2.8 years. The implant survival and success rates were 96.5% and 83.3% respectively, while 3.5% of early failures were detected. The lowest success rates were observed for implants supporting fixed full‐arch rehabilitations (71.05%) and overdenture rehabilitations (86.11%). A mean MBL of 1.81 ± 0.71 mm and a mean PPD of 3.38 ± 1.62 mm were recorded. The interaction between the collected data with MBL and PPD did not reveal any statistically significant differences between the variables (p > 0.05). A statistically significant difference was recorded when analyzing the association between the different types of prosthetic implant‐supported rehabilitations and success rates (p = 0.014), with fixed and removable full‐arch rehabilitations presenting with lower success rates. Answers to the questionnaire showed a generally high level of satisfaction. Conclusions Within the limits of this retrospective study and based on the results, an implant survival rate higher than 96% was observed after a mean observational period of 23.3 ± 2.8 years. Both the implant survival rate and MBL seemed stable after a mean observational period of 23.3 ± 2.8 years. Implants supporting fixed and removable full‐arch rehabilitations seemed to present lower success rates over time. Implant rehabilitation seemed to provide patients with optimal long‐term outcomes in terms of functional and psychological aspects.

Long-term clinical outcomes of short implant (6mm) in relation to Implant Disease Risk Assessment (IDRA).

Retrospective Study of Short Versus Standard Posterior Implants and Analysis of Implant Failure Risk Factors

Clinical Evaluation of Short and Wide-Diameter Implants Immediately Placed into Extraction Sockets of Posterior Areas: A 2-Year Retrospective Study

Analysis of Implant Loss Risk Factors after Simultaneous Guided Bone Regeneration: A Retrospective Study of 5404 Dental Implants

Outcomes That May Affect Implant and Prosthesis Survival and Complications in Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis Supported by Four or Six Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Retrospective Study on the Clinical Outcomes of Small-Diameter Implants Supporting Fixed Prostheses Without Bone Augmentation in the Posterior Region after 2 to 12 Years

Influence of crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic designs on the clinical conditions of short implants in posterior regions: A 4-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study.

Long-term outcomes of short dental implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: a clinical retrospective study of 5-10 years.

[A Long-Term Retrospective Clinical Study of Short Dental Implant Restoration].

Survival Analysis of Implants Placed Simultaneously with Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in Severely Atrophic Maxilla: A 3- to 12-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

A Prospective, Multicentre Study of 6-Mm Short Implants in Posterior Alveolar Bone Supporting Splinted Crowns: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study.

Short Versus Longer Implants with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation for Moderately Atrophic Posterior Maxillae: A 1-Year Randomized Clinical Trial.

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Short Locking-Taper Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Region: A 12-Year Retrospective Study.

Implant survival rate and marginal bone loss of 174 implants with different variables associated over a minimum observational period of 20 years: A retrospective study

Marginal Bone Level Changes Evaluation of Long-term Functional Dental Implants with the Implant Disease Risk Assessment Diagram: A 2 to 6 Years Follow-up Retrospective Study

A prospective, multi-center study assessing early loading with short implants in posterior regions. A 3-year post-loading follow-up study.

Short (≤6 mm) compared with ≥10‐mm dental implants in different clinical scenarios: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta‐analysis, trial sequential analysis and quality of evidence grading

Clinical, Radiographic And Economic Evaluation Of Short-6-Mm Implants And Longer Implants Combined With Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation In Moderately Atrophic Maxillae: A 3-Year Randomized Clinical Trial

Randomized controlled multi‐centre study comparing shorter dental implants (6 mm) to longer dental implants (11–15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 10‐year data

Long-term outcomes of narrow diameter implants in posterior jaws: A retrospective study with at least 8-year follow-up.

A 10‐year Retrospective Clinical Study to Identify Risk Indicators for Peri‐Implant Bone Loss and Implant Failure