Abstract:Background Limiting the marginal bone loss is a prerequisite for long-term stability of implants. Previous studies have evaluated the factors affecting marginal bone loss, including the mucous thickness, the depth of placement. The biologic width will form when the implants are uncovered, which unvaryingly exposes the bone around the implant neck to the oral cavity and starts bone loss, and the biologic width is formed by dissected mucous and the depth of placement of implant at initial stage. Aim/Hypothesis The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term effect of the mucous thickness, the depth of placement and the initial biologic width on the marginal bone loss. Material and Methods The clinical and radiographic data of 181 delayed-loaded Ankylos Implants in 140 patients were collected after 1–5 years follow-up. The radiographic examination was taken after implant placement, before the second stage surgery, and after 1–5 years follow-up. The mucous thickness, the depth of placement and crestal bone loss were calculated medially and distally. The initial biologic width was defined as either the thickness of the mucous when the implant was positioned supracrestally, or the sum of the thickness of the mucous and the depth of the implant when the implant was placed below the bone level. Implants were divided into 3 groups based on the initial biologic width, Group A (width less than 3 mm, include 3 mm), Group B (between 3 mm and 4 mm, include 4 mm), and Group C (width more than 4 mm). Significance was set to 0.05. Results Implants in Group A had 0.4(0.1.0) mm bone loss mesially and 0.3(0.0.8) mm distally. For Group B, the bone loss values were m- 0.3(0.0.8) mm and d- 0.3(0.0.7) mm. Group C implants experienced bone loss of m- 0.7(0.2.1.1) mm and d- 0.6(0.1.1.0) mm. Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to find differences between groups. There was significant difference between groups (P = 0.011). Kruskal-Wallis test for implants placed below, at, or above the bone level yielded a statistically significant difference (P = 0.000). The calculation of Spearman's correlation coefficient between the mucous thickness and the marginal bone loss shows negative correlation (rs=−0.243, P = 0.001), while the depth of placement and the marginal bone loss show the positive correlation (rs=0.477, P = 0.000). Conclusions and Clinical Implications The crestal bone loss was found to be the positively correlated to the depth of placement and had negative correlated to the mucous thickness. The result may suggest that the closer the initial biologic width is to the final biologic width, the less bone loss is, and if the initial biologic width is not adequate, bone loss may occur to ensure the proper development of biologic width.

Prosthetic emergence angle in different implant sites and their correlation with marginal bone loss: A retrospective study

Implant Survival Rate and Marginal Bone Loss with the All-on-4 Immediate-Loading Strategy: A Clinical Retrospective Study with 1 to 4 Years of Follow-Up.

Clinical Effect of Nobel Biocare Angulated Screw Channel Crown Compared with Cement Crown in the Aesthetic Area: A Retrospective Cohort Study with a Mean 32 Months Follow-Up (range 12 to 70 Months).

Marginal Bone Loss of Tissue- or Bone-Level Implants after Simultaneous Guided Bone Regeneration in the Posterior Mandibular Region: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Effect of Initial Biologic Width on Crestal Bone Loss‐ a Clinical Retrospective Study of 1–5 Years

Retrospective Study of Short Versus Standard Posterior Implants and Analysis of Implant Failure Risk Factors

Wide Restorative Emergence Angle Increases Marginal Bone Loss and Impairs Integrity of the Junctional Epithelium of the Implant Supracrestal Complex: A Preclinical Study

The Effect of Initial Biologic Width on Marginal Bone Loss: A Retrospective Study.

Influence of Buccal Emergence Profile Designs on Peri-Implant Tissues: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Factors Influencing Early Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants Positioned Subcrestally: A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Study

The Effect of Vertical Implant Position in Relation to Adjacent Teeth on Marginal Bone Loss in Posterior Arches: A Retrospective Study

A cross-sectional study for prevalence and risk factors of peri-implant marginal bone loss

Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up

Influence of crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic designs on the clinical conditions of short implants in posterior regions: A 4-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study.

Implant Failure and Marginal Bone Loss Between Axial and Tilted Implant: An Umbrella Review with Meta-analysis

Does crown-to-implant ratio affect marginal bone loss around a single short implant at the posterior of the mandible?

Clinical Observation on Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss Around Bone Level Implants and Tissue Level Im-Plants in Posterior Region

Early marginal bone loss around dental implants to define success in implant dentistry: A retrospective study

The Relationship between Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon Experience and Dental Implant Angulation Accuracy

Investigation of early marginal bone resorption of different implants in posterior-tooth areas and its influencing factors

How do the dimensions of peri‐implant mucosa affect marginal bone loss in equicrestal and subcrestal position of implants? A 1‐year clinical trial