Abstract:Introduction Short implants are today a reliable, minimally invasive option for the rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla. However, maintaining marginal bone stability remains a crucial factor for long‐term success, particularly in the case of short implants. The present multicenter prospective case–control study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of bone‐level and tissue‐level short implants in the posterior maxilla, focusing on implant survival and peri‐implant marginal bone stability over 1 year of function. Methods Fifty‐nine patients who met specific inclusion criteria were enrolled and treated by three clinical centers with a total of 74 short implants, either bone‐level (7 mm in length, placed 1 mm sub‐crestally) or tissue‐level (5 or 6.5 mm in length). The primary outcome was physiological bone remodeling (PBR) measured via radiographs at baseline (T0), prosthesis delivery (T1), and 12 months post‐loading (T2). Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate differences in PBR between groups, with multivariate analysis assessing the influence of various patient and site‐specific factors. Results The final analysis included 58 patients who were treated with a total of 71 short implants, comprising 36 tissue‐level and 35 bone‐level implants (one patient dropped out as he did not attend follow‐up visits on time). All implants were rehabilitated with fixed, screwed prosthetics after 5 months, with no recorded complications up to 1 year of loading. Stability was similar between the two implant types at T0 and T1, with no significant differences in insertion torque and implant stability quotient (ISQ). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between insertion torque and ISQ at T0, as well as with bicortical engagement of the implant apex with the sinus floor. Tissue‐level implants demonstrated significantly lower peri‐implant bone remodeling (PBR) compared to bone‐level implants at both T1 (0.11 ± 0.27 mm vs. 0.34 ± 0.35 mm, p = 0.004) and T2 (0.30 ± 0.23 mm vs. 0.55 ± 0.42 mm, p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed a significant positive correlation between PBR (T0–T1) and thin vertical mucosal thickness (≤ 2 mm) at T0 in both tissue‐level and bone‐level implants. Additionally, PBR (T1–T2) in both groups significantly correlated with the use of short prosthetic abutments (≤ 2 mm) and, only in bone‐level implants, with crown emergence angles > 30°. Conclusion Both tissue‐level and bone‐level short implants are effective options for implant‐supported rehabilitation in the posterior maxilla. Tissue‐level short implants offer superior marginal bone stability compared to bone‐level implants placed subcrestally, suggesting their favorable use in clinical practice.

Survival and Complication Rates of Short Implants‐supported Single Crowns in the Posterior Regions with High Crown‐implant Ration (C I)‐ A 10‐year Retrospective Study

Clinical Evaluation of Short and Wide-Diameter Implants Immediately Placed into Extraction Sockets of Posterior Areas: A 2-Year Retrospective Study

Retrospective Study of Short Versus Standard Posterior Implants and Analysis of Implant Failure Risk Factors

Long-term outcomes of short dental implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: a clinical retrospective study of 5-10 years.

Influence of crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic designs on the clinical conditions of short implants in posterior regions: A 4-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study.

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Short Locking-Taper Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Region: A 12-Year Retrospective Study.

[A Long-Term Retrospective Clinical Study of Short Dental Implant Restoration].

A Prospective, Multicentre Study of 6-Mm Short Implants in Posterior Alveolar Bone Supporting Splinted Crowns: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study.

Short and ultra‐short (<6‐mm) locking‐taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior areas (part II): A 5‐year retrospective study on periodontally healthy patients and patients with a history of periodontitis

Short (6 mm) and Regular Dental Implants in the Posterior Maxilla–7-Years Follow-up Study

Assessment of Peri-Implant Soft Tissues Conditions around Short and Ultra-Short Implant-Supported Single Crowns: A 3-Year Retrospective Study on Periodontally Healthy Patients and Patients with a History of Periodontal Disease

Clinical Study of Short Dental Implants Placed in Posterior Areas

Retrospective Clinical Analysis of Risk Factors Associated with Failed Short Implants.

Retrospective Study on the Clinical Outcomes of Small-Diameter Implants Supporting Fixed Prostheses Without Bone Augmentation in the Posterior Region after 2 to 12 Years

Clinical Outcomes of Bone‐Level and Tissue‐Level Short Implants Placed in Posterior Maxilla: A Case–Control Study

Clinical Evaluation of Short 6-Mm Implants Alone, Short 8-Mm Implants Combined with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation and Standard 10-Mm Implants Combined with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation in Posterior Maxillae: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Ten-Year Performance of Posterior 6-mm Implants with Single-Tooth Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Short Versus Longer Implants with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation for Moderately Atrophic Posterior Maxillae: A 1-Year Randomized Clinical Trial.

Treatment Strategies in Moderate Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: Short Dental Implants or Sinus Floor Elevation?

Does crown-to-implant ratio affect marginal bone loss around a single short implant at the posterior of the mandible?

Peri-Implant Conditions And Marginal Bone Loss Around Cemented And Screw-Retained Single Implant Crowns In Posterior Regions: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Up To 4 Years Follow-Up