Diagnosis of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in chronic pancreatitis: 13C-Mixed Triglyceride Breath Test versus Fecal Elastase.

V. González-Sánchez,R. Amrani,V. González,C. Trigo,A. Picó,E. de-Madaria

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2017.03.002

2017-03-07

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The Two-Dimensional Size of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue in the Anterior Maxilla and Some Relevance: A 1- to 7-Year Cross-Sectional Study.

Dandan Wang,Jiali Jin,Wenting Qi,Guofen Lin,Ping Sun,Fuming He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13256

IF: 7.478

2020-01-01

Journal Of Clinical Periodontology

Abstract:Aim This study measured the two-dimensional size of soft and hard tissues and analysed some relevance between them. Material and methods Ninety-six maxillary anterior implants with a follow-up time 1-7 years postoperatively were evaluated. We superimposed the CBCT data of 72 patients with the optical scan data, followed by the measurements of the thickness and the height of soft and bone tissues. The shoulder of the implant was the reference point for all vertical measurements. Results At the level of implant shoulder, the mid-buccal mean thickness of soft tissue was 1.83 +/- 0.76 mm, and on the palatal side, it was 4.00 +/- 1.22 mm. The mean height of mid-buccal and mid-palatal gingiva was 4.16 +/- 1.07 mm and 4.27 +/- 1.07 mm. The buccal and palatal vertical bone wall peak was 0.41 +/- 0.73 mm and 0.22 +/- 0.57 mm coronal to the implant shoulder, and the marginal bone loss was -0.28 +/- 0.76 mm and -0.84 +/- 1.41 mm. Correlation analysis showed that the soft tissue thickness was negatively correlated with the bone thickness at 0 mm on the buccal side and at 0/2/4 mm on the palatal side apical towards from implant shoulder. The gingival height was significantly positively correlated with bone peak height and marginal bone height. Conclusion Soft and hard tissues were basically negatively correlated in the horizontal direction. Sites with little marginal bone loss or high bone peak positively correlated with higher soft tissue levels.
Peri-implant Marginal Bone Changes with Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic or Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns: A Retrospective Clinical Study of 1 to 5 Years.

Xiao-ting Shen,Jia-ying Li,Xin Luo,Yi Feng,Li-ting Gai,Fu-ming He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.010

IF: 4.148

2022-01-01

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Abstract:Statement of problem. Monolithic zirconia has excellent mechanical and biologic properties. However, evidence of the clinical properties of implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses is limited.Purpose. The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to compare the peri-implant marginal bone changes of metal-ceramic and monolithic zirconia single crowns in the posterior region after prosthetic loading.Material and methods. A total of 224 participants treated with 327 implants restored with either metal-ceramic or monolithic zirconia single crowns in the posterior region between 2012 and 2016 were included in this study. Clinical outcomes, including the plaque index, peri-implant probing depth, and bleeding on probing, were recorded, and the marginal bone level was recorded by using the panoramic radiographs obtained at implant placement, second-stage surgery, and the most recent follow-up visit. The included parameters were analyzed with the nonparametric Mann-Whitney tests (a=.05).Results. The mean follow-up time was 30.4 months, and the cumulative survival rate of implants was 100% and that of the prostheses was 99.1%. The plaque index was 0.46 in the metal -ceramic group, which was significantly higher (P<.05) than 0.37 in the monolithic zirconia group. However, no significant differences (P>.05) were observed in peri-implant probing depth and bleeding on probing between the 2 groups. The marginal bone level at implant placement, second-stage surgery, and the most recent follow-up visit was above the implant platform in both the metal-ceramic and monolithic zirconia groups. The marginal bone changes of the metal-ceramic group was 0.31 mm in the healing period and 0.38 mm in the prosthetic loading period, while in the monolithic zirconia group, it was 0.25 mm in the healing period and 0.43 mm in the prosthetic loading period; no significant differences (P>.05) were observed between the 2 groups.Conclusions. The peri-implant marginal bone level change was comparable after prosthetic loading for metal-ceramic and monolithic zirconia single crowns, although monolithic zirconia was associated with reduced plaque. (J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:368-74)
Effect of Initial Biologic Width on Crestal Bone Loss‐ a Clinical Retrospective Study of 1–5 Years

Yi Feng,Fuming He,Xin Luo,Jiaying Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.206_13358

2018-01-01

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Abstract:Background Limiting the marginal bone loss is a prerequisite for long-term stability of implants. Previous studies have evaluated the factors affecting marginal bone loss, including the mucous thickness, the depth of placement. The biologic width will form when the implants are uncovered, which unvaryingly exposes the bone around the implant neck to the oral cavity and starts bone loss, and the biologic width is formed by dissected mucous and the depth of placement of implant at initial stage. Aim/Hypothesis The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term effect of the mucous thickness, the depth of placement and the initial biologic width on the marginal bone loss. Material and Methods The clinical and radiographic data of 181 delayed-loaded Ankylos Implants in 140 patients were collected after 1–5 years follow-up. The radiographic examination was taken after implant placement, before the second stage surgery, and after 1–5 years follow-up. The mucous thickness, the depth of placement and crestal bone loss were calculated medially and distally. The initial biologic width was defined as either the thickness of the mucous when the implant was positioned supracrestally, or the sum of the thickness of the mucous and the depth of the implant when the implant was placed below the bone level. Implants were divided into 3 groups based on the initial biologic width, Group A (width less than 3 mm, include 3 mm), Group B (between 3 mm and 4 mm, include 4 mm), and Group C (width more than 4 mm). Significance was set to 0.05. Results Implants in Group A had 0.4(0.1.0) mm bone loss mesially and 0.3(0.0.8) mm distally. For Group B, the bone loss values were m- 0.3(0.0.8) mm and d- 0.3(0.0.7) mm. Group C implants experienced bone loss of m- 0.7(0.2.1.1) mm and d- 0.6(0.1.1.0) mm. Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to find differences between groups. There was significant difference between groups (P = 0.011). Kruskal-Wallis test for implants placed below, at, or above the bone level yielded a statistically significant difference (P = 0.000). The calculation of Spearman's correlation coefficient between the mucous thickness and the marginal bone loss shows negative correlation (rs=−0.243, P = 0.001), while the depth of placement and the marginal bone loss show the positive correlation (rs=0.477, P = 0.000). Conclusions and Clinical Implications The crestal bone loss was found to be the positively correlated to the depth of placement and had negative correlated to the mucous thickness. The result may suggest that the closer the initial biologic width is to the final biologic width, the less bone loss is, and if the initial biologic width is not adequate, bone loss may occur to ensure the proper development of biologic width.
The Effect of Initial Biologic Width on Marginal Bone Loss: A Retrospective Study.

Ping Sun,Dan Yu,Xin Luo,Antian Xu,Yi Feng,Fu-Ming He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9169

2022-01-01

Abstract:Purpose: To evaluate the short-term effect of dental implant placement, mucosa thickness, and their combined effects (initial biologic width) on marginal bone loss. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study on patients who received implant surgery in the posterior region without bone augmentation surgery between 2012 and 2016, and implants had been loaded for more than 12 months. Each patient received radiographic examination before and after implant surgery, before the stage-two surgery, and during the 1-to 5-year follow-up. The thickness of mucosa, depth of dental implant placement, and crestal bone loss were evaluated on digital radiographs. The interaction was discussed by defining the combination of initial mucosal thickness and implantation depth as the initial biologic width. The implants were divided into four study groups based on the quartile of the initial biologic width. Results: This study included 266 patients (94 male and 172 female, 22 to 85 years of age, mean age: 51.43 years), with 413 dental implants placed including 239 Straumann implants and 174 Ankylos implants. The average follow-up was 21.50 months. After 1 to 5 years, the median crestal bone loss around implants was 0.35 mm (0.30 mm for Straumann BL and 0.40 mm for Ankylos). The implants were divided into four groups: group A (<= 2.85 mm), group B (2.85 to 3.40 mm), group C (3.40 to 3.97 mm), and group D ( 3.97 mm). Group B showed significantly less crestal bone loss than group A (0.38 mm vs 0.25 mm; P < .05) and group C (0.25 mm vs 0.40 mm; P < .05) during the follow-up. Significantly more crestal bone loss around implants was observed in the thin mucosa group than in the thick mucosa group (0.50 mm vs 0.30 mm; P < .001), while implants placed beneath the bone level displayed a significantly higher amount of marginal bone loss than implants placed even with the bone crest (0.50 mm vs 0.10 mm; P < .001). Conclusion: The initial biologic width has an effect on crestal bone loss. When the initial biologic width was between 2.85 and 3.40 mm, the marginal bone loss was lowest. Based on radiographic evaluation, implants placed in thick gingiva and even with the bone level showed less alveolar marginal bone loss compared with implants placed in thin gingiva and below the crestal bone level. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2022;37:190-198. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9169
The effect of one-time abutment placement on interproximal bone levels and peri-implant soft tissues: a prospective randomized clinical trial

Ana Molina,Ignacio Sanz-Sánchez,Conchita Martín,Juan Blanco,Mariano Sanz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12818

Abstract:Objective: To compare the effect of placing the definitive abutment at the time of implant placement versus at a later stage, on the soft and hard tissue changes around dental implants. Material and methods: Platform-switched implants were placed in the posterior maxilla or mandible of partial edentulous patients and they were randomized to receive the definitive abutment at the moment of implant placement, or 6-12 weeks later. Final prostheses were delivered 2-4 weeks later. Radiographic assessment of vertical bone level changes (primary outcome), clinical status of peri-implant tissues, changes in soft tissues margin, papilla filling, patient-related outcomes and adverse events were assessed 6 and 12 months after loading. Results: 60 implants were placed in 40 patients, replacing single or multiple absent teeth. One implant was lost 1 week after insertion (overall survival rate: 98.3%). A statistically significant greater bone resorption from surgery to 6 months post-loading was observed for those implants subjected to abutment change (control group: -1.24 ± 0.79 mm; test group: -0.61 ± 0.40 mm; P = 0.028). Periodontal clinical parameters and patient-related outcomes, however, did not demonstrate significant differences between groups at any time point. A significant increase in papilla height was observed from loading to 12 months in all implants (control group: 1.17 ± 1.47 mm; test group: 0.98 ± 0.89 mm) and a slight but not significant coronal migration of the gingival margin. Conclusions: The connection and disconnection of healing abutments is associated with significantly increased bone loss during the healing period between implant placement and 6 months post-loading, when compared to one-time abutment placement.
Similar short-term outcomes for bone-level implants with or without intermediate abutments

Kelvin I Afrashtehfar,Carlos A Jurado,Shatha S R H Alnuaimi,Sultan M S Alhadhrami

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01065-9

2024-09-18

Abstract:Design: A single-center (university-setting), prospective, longitudinal, split-mouth, single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial investigated peri-implant parameters of bone-level implants restored with either screw-retained prostheses connected directly to the implants or with intermediate abutments over a 3-year period. The study adhered to the ethical principles of the Helsinki Declaration and the CONSORT guidelines. Ethical approval was granted, and the trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov . Case selection: Participants included were over 18 years of age, had a plaque index below 25%, and were missing at least two adjacent teeth, allowing for rehabilitation with screw-retained fixed partial prostheses over two implants and 2-4 prosthetic units. Exclusion criteria included long-term use of medications affecting bone metabolism, smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day, history of local radiotherapy, untreated periodontitis, and the need for rehabilitation in the anterior sextant of the maxilla. The primary clinical outcome was marginal bone loss (MBL), while secondary outcomes included probing pocket depth (PPD), plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Study timeline: The study schedule included a screening (visit 1), implant surgery (visit 2), stage-two 8 weeks post-surgery (visit 3), impressions taken 4 weeks post stage-two (visit 4), baseline standardized radiograph (visit 5), followed by 6-month (visit 6), 12-month (visit 7), and 36-month (visit 8) follow-up visits. Data analysis: Descriptive statistics and quantitative measures included means, standard deviations (SDs), minimum and maximum values, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Clinical parameters (six sites per implant) measured were MBL, PPD, PI, and BOP. Paired t tests were utilized for intragroup comparisons across different time points and intergroup comparisons at each time point. PROs at 36 months were compared using Student's t test. The alpha significance level was set at 0.05. Results: The study included 36 patients (72 implants), with two not completing the follow-up due to death and relocation. No implants showed signs of inflammation or mobility. Mean interproximal bone level (IBL) at baseline was 0.13 mm ± 0.15 mm for the control group and 0.10 ± 0.13 mm for the test group. At the 36-month follow-up, mean IBL was 0.13 ± 0.18 mm for the control group and 0.20 ± 0.24 mm for the test group, with no significant differences (F(1, 32) = 1.06; p > 0.05). Clinical parameters (PPD, BOP, PI) at 36 months showed no significant differences between groups. Minor complications occurred in 6.7% of the control group and 5.3% of the test group. PROs indicated no significant differences in general satisfaction, esthetics, comfort, phonetics, and masticatory function between the groups. Conclusions: After a 36-month follow-up, bone-level implants restored with CAD/CAM prostheses directly connected to the implants displayed similar clinical outcomes, PROs, and marginal bone level changes as those restored with intermediate standardized abutments.
How do the dimensions of peri‐implant mucosa affect marginal bone loss in equicrestal and subcrestal position of implants? A 1‐year clinical trial

Norberto Quispe‐López,Cristina Gómez‐Polo,Álvaro Zubizarreta‐Macho,Javier Montero

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13306

2024-01-30

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Abstract:Introduction There is evidence that the apico‐coronal implant position and the mucosal phenotype can affect the extent of peri‐implant bone loss. This clinical trial analyzes the bone remodeling and marginal bone loss that occur around conical‐connection implants placed equicrestally and subcrestally, assessing the effect of the peri‐implant soft‐tissue phenotype. Methods Fifty‐one patients received 56 implants of distinct diameters (3.5 mm Ø n = 6; 4.3 mm Ø n = 41; 5 mm Ø n = 9) in the posterior part of the maxilla or mandible. The implants were placed equicrestally, 1 mm subcrestally and >1 mm subcrestally, depending on the initial supracrestal tissue height (STH). After 3 months of non‐submerged healing, single metal‐ceramic screw‐retained implant‐supported crowns were placed. Longitudinal measurements of STH, mucosal thickness and keratinized mucosa width (KMW) were made at the time of implant placement (T0), crown placement (T1), and after 3 (T2) and 6 months (T3) of prosthetic loading. At each of these points, a radiographic evaluation of bone remodeling and marginal bone loss was also performed. Results STH was significantly greater for implants placed >1 mm subcrestally than for those placed 1 mm subcrestally. After 12 months of follow‐up, a very significant (p 1 mm subcrestally, respectively. After the multiple linear regression, marginal bone loss was found to depend primarily on KMW (β = −0.43), while also being affected by STH (β = 0.32) and implant diameter (β = −0.28). Conclusions Marginal bone loss may be influenced by the position with respect to the bone crest, as well as the KMW, STH, and implant diameter. However, more well‐controlled studies are needed to verify these above‐mentioned findings with different implant designs and connections.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
The Effect of Vertical Implant Position in Relation to Adjacent Teeth on Marginal Bone Loss in Posterior Arches: A Retrospective Study

James Mailoa,Jia-Hui Fu,Hsun-Liang Chan,Vahid Khoshkam,Jeff Li,Hom-Lay Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4067

Abstract:Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the possible association between peri-implant marginal bone loss and the apicocoronal (vertical) positioning of dental implants placed adjacent to a tooth. Materials and methods: Dental records at the University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, were screened. To be included in the study, the patient had to have at least one implant in the premolar or molar region, unilaterally or bilaterally, in either arch, with an immediately mesial adjacent tooth. The implant had to have been functionally loaded for at least 3 years after crown insertion, and clear, nondistorted periapical films had to be available. Several landmarks were identified: the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and crestal bone (CB) of the tooth adjacent to the implant, the implant platform (PL), and the first radiographic implant-bone contact (BL). The following parameters were measured: CEJ-PL, CEJ-CB, CB-PL, horizontal distance between the adjacent tooth and PL (HD), and vertical distance between BL and the first implant thread at the mesial (BL-m) and distal (BL-d) implant surfaces. Results: A total of 139 patients with a mean age of 62.1 ± 9.3 years were included. The mean follow-up period was 4.42 ± 2.5 years. When the implant was placed more than 3 mm apical to the CEJ of the adjacent tooth, significantly greater peri-implant bone loss occurred at the mesial (difference of means = 0.57 mm) and distal (difference of means = 0.83 mm) implant surfaces. Conclusion: In this study population, implants placed in the posterior area with a vertical distance greater than 3 mm from the CEJ of the adjacent tooth displayed more peri-implant bone loss. Further investigation is required to determine whether this increased peri-implant bone loss predisposes a site to peri-implantitis.
A retrospective radiographic study on the effect of natural tooth-implant proximity and an introduction to the concept of a bone-loading platform switch

Rainer A Urdaneta,Rudolf Seemann,Irina-Florentina Dragan,William Lubelski,Joseph Leary,Sung-Kiang Chuang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3699

Abstract:Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of tooth-implant proximity using an implant system with a double platform shift that was designed to load bone coronal to the implant-abutment cohort study was conducted between January 2008 and December 2009. The sample was composed of patients who had received at least one 5-mm-wide hydroxyapatite-coated single-tooth Bicon implant that had been placed adjacent to at least one natural tooth. Descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariate linear mixed-effects regression models, adjusted for multiple implants in the same patient, were utilized. The primary predictor variable was the horizontal distance between implant and adjacent tooth, and the primary outcome variable was the change in peri-implant bone levels over time. Results: Two hundred six subjects who received 235 plateau root-form implants were followed for an average of 42 months. Tooth-implant distance ranged between 0 and 14.6 mm. Out of 235 implants, 43 implants were placed < 1 mm to an adjacent natural tooth on mesial and/or distal sides. The proximity of a plateau root-form implant was not associated with complications on the adjacent tooth such as bone loss, root resorption, endodontic treatment, pain, or extraction. The proximity of an adjacent tooth was not a risk factor for the failure of a plateau root-form implant. After adjusting for other covariates in a multivariate model, the proximity of a natural tooth did not have a statistically significant effect on peri-implant bone levels (P = .13). The extraction of an adjacent tooth was associated with a significant increase in peri-implant bone loss (P = .008). Conclusion: The placement of a plateau root-form implant with a sloping shoulder in close proximity to an adjacent tooth did not cause damage to that tooth or lead to bone loss or the failure of the implant.
Artificial gravity maintains skeletal muscle protein synthesis during 21 days of simulated microgravity.

T. Symons,M. Sheffield-Moore,D. Chinkes,A. Ferrando,D. Paddon-Jones

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.91137.2008

2009-07-01

Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract:We sought to determine the effects of longitudinal loading (artificial gravity) on skeletal muscle protein kinetics in 15 healthy young males after 21 days of 6 degrees head-down tilt bed rest [experimental treatment (Exp) group: n = 8, 31 +/- 1 yr; control (Con) group; n = 7, 28 +/- 1 yr, means +/- SE]. On days 1 and 21 of bed rest, postabsorptive venous blood samples and muscle biopsies (vastus lateralis and soleus) were obtained during a 1-h pulse bolus infusion protocol (0 min, l-[ring-(13)C(6)]phenylalanine, 35 mumol/kg; 30 min, l-[ring-(15)N]phenylalanine, 35 mumol/kg). Outcome measures included mixed muscle fractional synthesis (FSR) and breakdown rates (FBR). The Exp group experienced 1 h of longitudinal loading (2.5G at the feet) via a short-radius centrifuge during each day of bed rest. Mixed muscle FSR in the Con group was reduced by 48.5% (day 1, 0.081 +/- 0.000%/h vs. day 21, 0.042 +/- 0.000%/h; P = 0.001) in vastus lateralis after 21 days of bed rest, whereas the Exp group maintained their rate of protein synthesis. A similar but nonsignificant change in FSR was noted for the soleus muscle (Exp, -7%; Con, -22%). No changes in muscle protein breakdown were observed. In conclusion, 1 h of daily exposure to artificial gravity maintained the rate of protein synthesis of the vastus lateralis and may represent an effective adjunct countermeasure to combat the loss of muscle mass and functional during extended spaceflight.
One-Abutment One-Time Effect on Peri-Implant Marginal Bone: A Prospective, Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Study

Filipe Moreira,Salomão Rocha,Francisco Caramelo,João P. Tondela

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14154179

IF: 3.4

2021-07-27

Materials

Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the peri-implant hard tissue change at 6 and 12 months after implant placement between definitive abutment placed at the same time of implant surgery, never removing it, and healing abutment disconnected and reconnected three times until the placement of the final rehabilitation. Material and methods: Each partial edentulous patient could receive between 1 and 4 platform-switched implants in the posterior regions. If the implants had primary stability—implant stability quotient (ISQ) equal to or greater than 50, they were randomized to the test group with the abutment inserted at the same time of implant placement (DA) or to the control group, receiving a healing abutment (PA). At 6 and 12 months after surgery, data related with vertical bone level changes (primary outcome) and other clinical parameters (implant mobility, bleeding on probing, probing depth, plaque index) were assessed. Results: 53 implants were included in the trial and completed 12 months follow-up (overall survival rate: 100%). All implants achieved primary stability, with an average ISQ value of 80.9 on the day of surgery. From surgery to 6 months, the mean bone loss was 0.14 ± 0.18 mm for the DA group and 0.23 ± 0.29 mm for the PA group, without statistical significance difference. Between 6 and 12 months, the mean bone loss was 0.14 ± 0.21 mm for the DA group and 0.21 ± 0.27 mm for the PA group, also without statistical significance between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences (p = 0.330) in total bone loss after 12 months between the control and the study groups. Conclusions: The one abutment one time protocol has at least an equivalent effect on the peri-implant bone level changes when compared with the use of healing abutments that are disconnected and reconnected at least three times.

materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied, condensed matter,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering
Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up

Odontuya Dorj,Hsi-Kuei Lin,Eisner Salamanca,Yu-Hwa Pan,Yi-Fan Wu,Yung-Szu Hsu,Jerry C-Y Lin,Chin-Kai Lin,Wei-Jen Chang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010715

IF: 4.614

2021-10-13

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract:Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of opposite tooth conditions on change in marginal bone level (MBL) around submerged dental implants. Materials and methods: The study included healthy patients with one or two implants. Structures opposite implants were either natural teeth (NT) or fixed restorations (FRs). MBLs were measured on digital periapical radiographs at the mesial and distal aspects of each implant. Results: Sixty implants were inserted by the 3-year follow-up. Mean MBLs for NT were 0.21 ± 0.33 mm before prosthetic loading and 0.30 ± 0.41 mm 3 years later (p = 0.001). Mean MBLs with FRs were 0.36 ± 0.45 mm before loading and 0.53 ± 0.50 mm 3 years later (p < 0.001). Changes in mean MBL from the 6-month follow-up to the 1- and 3-year follow-ups were statistically significant (p < 0.01) for implants opposite NT. However, changes in mean MBL from the 6-month follow-up to the 1-year (p = 0.161) and 3-year follow-ups (p = 1.000) were not significant for implants opposite FRs. Between baseline and the 3-year follow-up, MBL change was relatively small and did not differ regarding NT and FRs. Conclusion: Bone loss was greater if submerged dental implants were opposed by FRs. MBLs around submerged implants continued to change after 3 years if NT opposed implants.

public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
A two-year prospective study to compare the peri-implant parameters of posterior implant-supported single crowns with and without mesial proximal contact loss

Kai-Wen Ko,Chih-Wen Cheng,Yu-Jui Hsu,Wu-Ping Chiu,Feng-Chang Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2023.11.014

Abstract:Background/purpose: Interproximal contact loss may lead to food impaction and result in subsequently periodontal complications. The purpose of this prospective study was to investigate the peri-implant parameters of posterior implant-supported single crowns (SCs) with and without mesial proximal contact loss after 2 years of follow-up. Material and methods: Twenty-six patients with a total of 40 posterior implant-supported SCs with mesial adjacent natural teeth were observed for 24 months after crown insertion. The mesial proximal contacts were assessed by dental floss, then were classified as tight, weak, and open contacts. The following peri-implant parameters were evaluated, including modified plaque index (MPI), modified gingival index (MGI), and probing depth (PD) were conducted at six sites per tooth (mesiofacail, midfacial, distofacial, mesiolingual, mid-lingual and distolingual) in the 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month following visits. Furthermore, radiographs were taken regularly in 12- and 24-month recall sections for measuring the marginal bone loss (MBL). Results: At 12-month observation, the incidence rates of weak and open contacts were 22.5 % and 12.5 %; whereas after 24 months of clinical service, the rates came up with 12.9 % and 25.6 %, respectively. No significant differences were found between the tight, weak, and open contact groups in the parameters of MPI, MGI, or PD (P > 0.05) at 12- and 24-month follow-up. None of the mean differences of the peri-implant parameters: MPI, MGI, PD and MBL had significant differences between the tight, weak, and open contact groups after 1 and 2 years of clinical service (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The presence of open, weak, and tight mesial proximal contacts had no significant effects on the peri-implant tissue conditions.
The influence of simultaneous lateral grafting on clinical outcomes following one-stage implant placement: a cross-sectional analysis

Ausra Ramanauskaite,Frank Schwarz,Amira Begic,Puria Parvini,Maria Elisa Galarraga-Vinueza,Karina Obreja

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00226-6

2020-07-14

International Journal of Implant Dentistry

Abstract:Abstract Background To investigate the influence of lateral bone augmentation procedures performed simultaneously with implant placement on peri-implant health or disease. Material and methods A total of 232 patients showing the same type of a two-piece implant placed either simultaneously with lateral bone grafting using a bovine bone mineral and a native collagen membrane ( n = 291 implants; test group) or at pristine bone sites without lateral bone grafting ( n = 283 implants; control group) were enrolled in this cross-sectional analysis. Clinical outcomes (i.e., modified plaque index (mPI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), and mucosal recession (MR)), and the frequency of peri-implant disease were evaluated after a mean follow-up period of 9.97 ± 6.55 years. Results No differences were found between the patients in the test and control groups for any of the parameters investigated (i.e., mPI, BOP, PD, and MR). For the implants in both groups, PD values of 4–6 mm were more frequently noted in the upper jaw. A significant correlation between increased PD values and a larger implant diameter was noted for test implant sites. A KM of < 2 mm was associated with increased MR values in both groups. The prevalence of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis was 68% and 5% for the patients in the test group and 61% and 10% in the control group, respectively. Conclusions Simultaneous lateral grafting was associated with peri-implant tissue health and stability.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
The effect of BioHPP versus Zirconia CAD/CAM-fabricated fixed-detachable prosthesis rehabilitating single maxillary arches on the peri-implant bone level changes

Mona Aboelnagga,Omar El Sadat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/omx.2022.134671.1160

2022-01-01

Abstract:Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare the use of BioHPP and zirconia CAD/CAM fabricated materials inimplant supported maxillary fixed-detachable prosthesis opposing dentate mandibular arch, where peri-implants bone levelchanges were evaluated for two years.Materials and method: Ten patients with edentulous single maxilla opposing dentate mandibular arch were selected toshare in this study. For all patients, proper planning for implant placement was made where the participants were randomlyallocated into two groups five patients in each group. Six implants were inserted guided by the sterolithographic surgical guidefollowing flapless surgical approach. Immediate loading protocol was followed, where the milled acrylic temporary prosthesis,which was planned for each patient according to the computer software, was screwed to the implants. After 4 months, thefinal restoration was placed according to the following grouping. In group I, patients were rehabilitated with fixed-detachablezirconium restoration while in group II patients were rehabilitated with fixed-detachable BioHpp Peek restoration. Peri-implantmarginal bone changes were evaluated at loading time, after 6 month, 1 and 2 years follow up visits. Data collected weretabulated and statistically analyzed.Results: In intragroup comparisons, peri implant bone loss was significant. Where in group I, the mean value of peri–implantbone height change measures from implants insertion to 6 month was 0.35 mm, from insertion to 12 months was 0.62 mm whilefrom insertion to 24 months follow up was found to be 0.96 mm. While in group II at same time intervals were 0.39 mm, 0.69mm and 1.23 mm respectively. On the other hand in intergroup comparison, to compare the mean amount of peri-implant boneheight changes in the two studied groups during the follow up intervals, student t test was performed and showed that group IIhad a non significant higher bone loss.Conclusion: Based on these results and within the limitation of this study. Both Zirconia and BioHpp when used as frameworkmaterial for fixed-detachable maxillary single prosthesis had successful results on the supporting implants. However, BioHppfixed-detachable prosthesis had higher effect on the peri-implant marginal bone loss but it was not of statistical significance.
Impact of bone defect morphology on the outcome of reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis

Ahmad Aghazadeh,Rutger G. Persson,Stefan Renvert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00219-5

2020-06-17

International Journal of Implant Dentistry

Abstract:Abstract Objectives To assess if (I) the alveolar bone defect configuration at dental implants diagnosed with peri-implantitis is related to clinical parameters at the time of surgical intervention and if (II) the outcome of surgical intervention of peri-implantitis is dependent on defect configuration at the time of treatment. Materials and methods In a prospective study, 45 individuals and 74 dental implants with ≥ 2 bone wall defects were treated with either an autogenous bone transplant or an exogenous bone augmentation material. Defect fill was assessed at 1 year. Results At baseline, no significant study group differences were identified. Most study implants (70.7%, n = 53) had been placed in the maxilla. Few implants were placed in molar regions. The mesial and distal crestal width at surgery was greater at 4-wall defects than at 2-wall defects ( p = 0.001). Probing depths were also greater at 4-wall defects than at 2-wall defects ( p = 0.01). Defect fill was correlated to initial defect depth ( p < 0.001). Defect fill at 4-wall defects was significant ( p < 0.05). Conclusions (I) The buccal-lingual width of the alveolar bone crest was explanatory to defect configuration, (II) 4-wall defects demonstrated more defect fill, and (III) deeper defects resulted in more defect fill.

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
The Use of Two-Piece Transmucosal Implants Designed with a Convergent Neck: A 6-Year Clinical Prospective Cohort Study Evaluating the Impact on Soft and Hard Tissues

Carlo Prati,Fausto Zamparini,Andrea Spinelli,Jacopo Lenzi,Maria Giovanna Gandolfi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10509

2024-06-21

Abstract:Purpose: This prospective study evaluated the marginal bone level and periodontal parameters 6 years after placement of a convergent transmucosal neck implant. Materials and methods: In total, 71 implants were placed in 60 patients. Of these, 52 implants were placed with a flapless technique and with the convergent neck exposed by 1 mm (early and delayed placement), while 19 implants were placed immediately after extraction (immediate placement). At least 3 months after insertion, customized abutments were applied and provisional resin crowns were cemented, while being careful to prevent any tissue compression. After 3 weeks, definitive metal-ceramic crowns were designed with the finish line at the soft tissue level and free from any compression. The implant survival rate at 6 years, marginal bone level changes (ΔMBL, mm), and Pink Esthetic Score (PES) were evaluated. Gingival phenotype was determined before the implant surgeries (thin/thick). A three-level hierarchical model was examined with a random intercept and random slope on follow-up time at the patient level and a random intercept at the implant level. Results: In all, 57 patients with 67 implants reached the 6-year point; 3 patients (5.0%) dropped out. The implant survival rate was 100%. ΔMBL from baseline to 24 months was 0.58 mm (95% CI: 0.48, 0.68), while ΔMBL from 24 to 72 months was 0.33 mm (95% CI: 0.19, 0.47). PES improved steadily from 6 to 48 months (+0.96; 95% CI: 0.71, 1.20), with overall stability at 72 months. No correlation between MBL and PES was observed. A significant association was found between thick gingival phenotype and less MBL variation. Greater implant diameter offered more MBL stability after 3 years but resulted in lower PES values. Conclusions: The use of convergent transmucosal neck implants placed with a flapless transmucosal approach with the crown margin positioned at the gingival level preserved marginal bone and guided gingival morphology for up to 72 months. The gingival phenotype was the parameter that most affected the soft and hard tissues. In the long term, implant placement timing was not related to MBL.
A Cbct Study Of Buccal Bone Thickness Versus Horizontal Bone Alterations At Implant Neck Following Immediate Implantation In The Aesthetic Zone, A Retrospective Study

Min Sheng,Denghui Zhang,Guoqiang Zhang,Xiaochen Liu,Fuming He,Huiming Wang,Yi Zhou

2019-01-01

Abstract:Objective: CBCT was used to investigate the effect of buccal bone thickness on horizontal bone loss at implant neck following immediate implantation in the aesthetic zone of the anterior maxilla and guided bone regeneration (GBR). Methods: Selecting CBCT data from patients who received immediate implant placement in the aesthetic zone with simultaneous GBR between April 2014 and January 2018. 72 patients (with a total of 90 dental implants) aged 18 to 65 years were selected as subjects. They received CBCT examination on the postoperative day, at 6th month and at least 12 months after implantation to measure horizontal buccal bone thicknesses at implant neck. The patients were divided into Groups 1 to 5 according to different thicknesses on the postoperative day (< 2 mm, 2-2.5 mm, 2.5-3 mm, 3-3.5 mm, and > 3.5 mm). Data were statistically analyzed using paired t test, One-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons of LSD. Results: Comparing the horizontal buccal bone loss rate at 6 months postoperatively, Group 1 (10.32 +/- 29.18%) was significantly less than Groups 3 (28.43 +/- 20.98%), 4 (30.15 +/- 23.65%) and 5 (36.15 +/- 18.06%) (P = 0.021, 0.014 and 0.002, respectively). Greater than 12 months after implantation, Group 1(22.53 +/- 37.36%) was significantly less than Groups 3 (40.89 +/- 20.57%), 4 (42.50 +/- 25.73%) and 5 (49.53 +/- 15.96%) (P = 0.026, 0.018 and 0.002, respectively), while Group 2 (27.45 +/- 18.81%) was also less than Group 5 (P = 0.012). Bone loss was more significant in the first six months after implantation than that in the latter six months (P = 0.013). Conclusion: After immediate implantation in the aesthetic zone with simultaneous GBR, there were horizontal bone loss at implant neck when the buccal bone thickness was above 3.5 mm.
Influence of crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic designs on the clinical conditions of short implants in posterior regions: A 4-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study.

Juan Wang,Yiman Tang,Huajie Yu,M. Gao,L. Qiu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12881

2020-01-06

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Abstract:BACKGROUND Short implants (intra-bony length ≤ 8 mm) are generally considered as an alternative to bone augmentation in challenging situations; however, clinical evidence from large-scale studies with long follow-up regarding the application of short implants remains deficient. PURPOSE The present study aimed to assess the mid-term clinical outcomes of short implants supporting fixed prostheses in the posterior region, and to investigate the effects of the crown-to-implant ratio (C/I), and other patient-, implant-, prosthesis-relevant factors on the clinical conditions around short implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS 180 Thommen short implants in 130 partially edentulous patients were enrolled in the study after 3 to 7 (mean 4.2) years of follow-up. Potential risk factors (patient sex and age, implant diameter and location, splinted vs single-tooth restorations, retention mode, anatomical and clinical C/I ratios) were evaluated according to the following outcomes: Implant survival, marginal bone loss (MBL), and mechanical and biological complications. RESULTS In total, four implants in four patients failed as a result of peri-implantitis. The cumulative survival rate was 97.8% for implant-based analysis. The peri-implant MBL around 180 short implants was 0.90 ± 0.78 mm. The mean clinical C/I ratio was 1.16 ± 0.36. Correlation analysis revealed that the influence of the clinical C/I ratio and patient age were significant for MBL (P < .05), whereas other potential risk factors showed no significant association with the outcome. Among 180 short implants, 24 cases (13.3%) had biological complications and 32 cases (17.8%) had mechanical complications, respectively. Peri-implant MBL and complication rates around splinted and non-splinted implants were not statistically different. CONCLUSION Within the limitations of this study, short implants supporting fixed prostheses in the posterior region achieved predictable clinical outcomes over a 3 to 7 year period. Within the range of 0.47 to 3.01, the higher the C/I ratio, the less the peri-implant MBL.

Engineering,Medicine
Maturational changes of amino acid concentration in cerebrospinal fluid of the rat

R. Korobkin,R. Cutler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(77)90098-1

IF: 3.61

1977-01-01

Brain Research

Abstract:

Diagnosis of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in chronic pancreatitis: 13C-Mixed Triglyceride Breath Test versus Fecal Elastase.

The Two-Dimensional Size of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue in the Anterior Maxilla and Some Relevance: A 1- to 7-Year Cross-Sectional Study.

Peri-implant Marginal Bone Changes with Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic or Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns: A Retrospective Clinical Study of 1 to 5 Years.

Effect of Initial Biologic Width on Crestal Bone Loss‐ a Clinical Retrospective Study of 1–5 Years

The Effect of Initial Biologic Width on Marginal Bone Loss: A Retrospective Study.

The effect of one-time abutment placement on interproximal bone levels and peri-implant soft tissues: a prospective randomized clinical trial

Similar short-term outcomes for bone-level implants with or without intermediate abutments

How do the dimensions of peri‐implant mucosa affect marginal bone loss in equicrestal and subcrestal position of implants? A 1‐year clinical trial

The Effect of Vertical Implant Position in Relation to Adjacent Teeth on Marginal Bone Loss in Posterior Arches: A Retrospective Study

A retrospective radiographic study on the effect of natural tooth-implant proximity and an introduction to the concept of a bone-loading platform switch

Artificial gravity maintains skeletal muscle protein synthesis during 21 days of simulated microgravity.

One-Abutment One-Time Effect on Peri-Implant Marginal Bone: A Prospective, Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Study

Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up

A two-year prospective study to compare the peri-implant parameters of posterior implant-supported single crowns with and without mesial proximal contact loss

The influence of simultaneous lateral grafting on clinical outcomes following one-stage implant placement: a cross-sectional analysis

The effect of BioHPP versus Zirconia CAD/CAM-fabricated fixed-detachable prosthesis rehabilitating single maxillary arches on the peri-implant bone level changes

Impact of bone defect morphology on the outcome of reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis

The Use of Two-Piece Transmucosal Implants Designed with a Convergent Neck: A 6-Year Clinical Prospective Cohort Study Evaluating the Impact on Soft and Hard Tissues

A Cbct Study Of Buccal Bone Thickness Versus Horizontal Bone Alterations At Implant Neck Following Immediate Implantation In The Aesthetic Zone, A Retrospective Study

Influence of crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic designs on the clinical conditions of short implants in posterior regions: A 4-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study.

Maturational changes of amino acid concentration in cerebrospinal fluid of the rat