Abstract:Objective:To analyze the longitudinal variation of occlusal force distribution and occlusal contact time in posterior implant-supported single crown with the computerized occlusal analysis system.Methods:Partially edentulous patients who visited the Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology between December 2012 and December 2013, and had received implant-supported single crown in the posterior region were enrolled. The participants underwent occlusal examinations with the computerized occlusal analysis system at 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, and 4 years after implant prosthesis delivery. The relative occlusal force (ROF) of implant prostheses, mesial adjacent teeth, and control teeth (corresponding teeth on the contralateral side) were recorded, and implant prosthesis occlusion time ratios (implant prosthesis occlusion time/occlusion time) were calculated. The interproximal contact between implant prostheses and adjacent teeth was evaluated using metal contact gauge and dental floss. Mechanical complications of implant prostheses were recorded. The paired t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the implant prosthesis occlusion time ratios and ROF of implant prostheses at 2 different times as a self-control. The differences in ROF between implant prostheses and control teeth in the same participant at the same time were also analyzed using paired t test. Using a complementary log-log model, the correlation between the occurrence of veneering material fracture and ROF of implant prosthesis was analyzed with gender, age and follow-up time as the control variables. Results:Thirty-seven posterior fixed implant-supported single crowns in 33 participants, including 16 men and 17 women aged (42.8±12.9) years (23.9 to 70.0 years) were followed up for 2 weeks to 4 years [(38.3±15.2) months]. The ROF of implant prostheses increased significantly ( P<0.01) from 2 weeks [(7.0±4.2)%] to 3 months [(9.9±6.8)%], whereas those of control natural teeth decreased significantly ( P<0.05) from (13.1±6.1)% to (11.4±5.5)%. The ROF of implant prostheses continued to increase from 6 months to 1 year, from 1 year to 2 years and from 2 years to 3 years, with significant differences ( P<0.05). Implant prosthesis occlusion time ratios also increased significantly between 2 weeks and 3 months and between 3 months and 6 months ( P<0.05). No significant differences were found between other time points ( P>0.05). For comparison between implant prosthesis and control teeth at the same time point, the ROF of the implant prostheses [(7.5±4.2)%] were significantly lower than those of the control teeth [(13.8±6.0)%] at 2 weeks ( P<0.01). While at 4 years, ROF of implant prostheses [16.7% (8.6%, 32.4%)] became significantly higher than those of control teeth [9.5% (4.9%, 18.0%)] ( P<0.05). ROF of the implant prostheses did not differ significantly with those of the control teeth in other follow-up time points ( P>0.05). The 4-year cumulative incidence of proximal contact loss rate was 32% (22/68). The incidences of veneering material fracture and prostheses loosening were 16% (6/37) and 8% (3/37), respectively. Logistic regression showed a significant correlation between veneering material fracture and ROF of implant prostheses ( r=0.26, P<0.05). Conclusions:The occlusal force and occlusal contact time of posterior implant-supported single crown change over time in 4-year follow-up period, which is mainly reflected in the increasing occlusal force and occlusal contact time. The occlusion of posterior implant prostheses should be carefully monitored during follow-up examinations, and occlusal adjustment should be considered when necessary.

A two-year prospective study to compare the peri-implant parameters of posterior implant-supported single crowns with and without mesial proximal contact loss

Peri-implant Marginal Bone Changes with Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic or Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns: A Retrospective Clinical Study of 1 to 5 Years.

Peri-Implant Conditions And Marginal Bone Loss Around Cemented And Screw-Retained Single Implant Crowns In Posterior Regions: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Up To 4 Years Follow-Up

Proximal Contact Alterations Between Implant-Supported Restorations And Adjacent Natural Teeth In The Posterior Region: A 1-Year Preliminary Study

Changes in Proximal Contact Tightness Between Fixed Implant Prostheses and Adjacent Teeth: A 1-Year Prospective Study

Occlusal change in posterior implant-supported single crowns and its association with peri-implant bone level: a 5-year prospective study

Occlusion Variation of Posterior Implant-Supported Single Crown: a Prospective 4-Year Follow-Up Study

Analyzing the Occlusion Variation of Single Posterior Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses by Using the T-scan System: A Prospective 3-Year Follow-Up Study.

Interproximal contact loss at implant sites: a retrospective clinical study with a 10‐year follow‐up

[The Loss of Interproximal Contact Between Posterior Fixed Implant Prostheses and Adjacent Teeth: a Retrospective Study].

[A Prospective Cohort Study on the Effect of Implant Restoration Following Micro Crestal Flap-Alveolar Ridge Preservation at Molar Extraction Sockets with Severe Periodontitis].

The Effect of Interimplant Distance on Peri-implant Bone and Soft Tissue Dimensional Changes: A Nonrandomized, Prospective, 2-Year Follow-up Study

The prevalence and associated factors of proximal contact loss between implant restoration and adjacent tooth after function: A retrospective study

Interproximal open contacts between implant restorations and adjacent natural teeth as a risk‐indicator for peri‐implant disease—A cross‐sectional study

[Quantitative Analysis of Occlusal Changes in Posterior Partial Fixed Implant Supported Prostheses].

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Short Locking-Taper Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Region: A 12-Year Retrospective Study.

Assessment of Peri-Implant Soft Tissues Conditions around Short and Ultra-Short Implant-Supported Single Crowns: A 3-Year Retrospective Study on Periodontally Healthy Patients and Patients with a History of Periodontal Disease

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of implant‐supported fixed prostheses with cantilever extension in anterior mandible: A retrospective study

Esthetic outcome and alterations of soft tissue around single implant crowns: a 2-year prospective study.

Clinical evaluation of closed tray impression and intraoral scanning techniques in single posterior tissue-level implant-supported crowns: A self-controlled case study

Interproximal contact loss between implant restorations and adjacent natural teeth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis