Aeroelastic model and analysis of an active camber morphing wing

Jiaying Zhang,Alexander D. Shaw,Chen Wang,Huaiyuan Gu,Mohammadreza Amoozgar,Michael I. Friswell,Benjamin K.S. Woods

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106534

IF: 5.457

2021-04-01

Aerospace Science and Technology

Abstract:<p>Morphing aircraft structures usually introduce greater compliance into aerodynamic sections, and therefore will affect the aeroelasticity with the potential risk of increased flutter. A low-fidelity model of an active camber morphing wing and its aeroelastic model are developed in order to investigate the potential critical speed by exploiting its chord-wise dimension and flexibility. Such a model may be used for conceptual design, where low fidelity models are used to explore and optimise a wide range of configurations. The morphing camber concept is implemented using a continuous representation of a two-segment structure with a rigid segment and a deformable part. The aeroelastic model is developed based on both steady and unsteady aerodynamic models, so that different parameters can be easily modified to examine changes in the flutter solutions. Of particular interest are the ratio of the morphing segment length to the chord, and its relative stiffness, as such morphing camber is potential operated using the deformable part as a flap. By comparing the results of the quasi-steady and unsteady aerodynamic models, it is shown that the quasi-steady aerodynamic model gives a more conservative prediction of the flutter speed. In addition, responses in phase space are simulated to show the fundamental aeroelastic behaviour of the morphing camber wing. It is also shown that the active compliant segment can be used to stabilise the morphing aircraft by using feedback control. This paper provides a system-level insight through mathematical modelling, parameter analysis and feedback control into dynamics applications of morphing camber.</p>

engineering, aerospace

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **the flutter problem of morphing wings during flight due to structural flexibility and aeroelastic effects**. Specifically, morphing wings adapt to different flight conditions by changing the camber of the airfoil, but this change will increase the flexibility of the wing, thereby affecting its aeroelastic characteristics and may lead to unstable phenomena such as flutter. Therefore, the paper aims to develop a low - fidelity active camber - morphing wing model and its aeroelastic model to study its potential critical velocities and explore how to stabilize the morphing wing through feedback control.

### Main research contents:
1. **Model development**:
- A low - fidelity active camber - morphing wing model was developed, which consists of a rigid section and a morphing section.
- The rigid section is used to provide structural support, and the morphing section realizes the change of airfoil camber through continuous deformation.

2. **Aeroelastic analysis**:
- Based on the steady - state and unsteady aerodynamic models, an aeroelastic model of the morphing wing was established.
- The influence of the ratio of the length of the morphing section to the chord length and its relative stiffness on the flutter velocity was studied.

3. **Stability analysis**:
- Through eigenvalue analysis, the stability of the morphing wing at different free - stream velocities was studied.
- The prediction results of the flutter velocity by the quasi - steady - state and unsteady aerodynamic models were compared, and it was found that the flutter velocity given by the quasi - steady - state model was more conservative.

4. **Feedback control**:
- A feedback control method was proposed, using the morphing section as a rudder surface to stabilize the morphing wing.
- The effectiveness of the feedback control was verified by numerical simulation.

### Key formulas:
- **Kinetic energy**:
\[
T_r=\frac{1}{2}m_1\dot{h}^2+\frac{1}{2}I_r\dot{\alpha}^2 + m_1x_{cg}\dot{h}\dot{\alpha}
\]
\[
T_s=\frac{1}{2}\int_0^l\rho A\left(\dot{h}+\sum_{j = 1}^n\phi_i\dot{\xi}_i+\dot{\alpha}(x + r)\right)^2dx
\]
\[
T=T_s+T_r
\]

- **Potential energy**:
\[
U_r=\frac{1}{2}K_hh^2+\frac{1}{2}K_\alpha\alpha^2
\]
\[
U_s=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i = 1}^n\omega_i^2\xi_i^2
\]
\[
U = U_r+U_s
\]

- **Equations of motion**:
\[
\ddot{\xi}_i+\ddot{\alpha}b_i+\ddot{h}a_i+\omega_i^2\xi_i=Q_{\xi_i}
\]
\[
I_a\ddot{\alpha}+S_a\ddot{h}+\sum_{i = 1}^n b_i\ddot{\xi}_i+K_\alpha\alpha=Q_\alpha
\]
\[
m_a\ddot{h}+S_a\ddot{\alpha}+\sum_{i = 1}^n a_i\ddot{\xi}_i+K_hh=Q_h
\]

- **Aerodynamic force**:
\[
P_{nc}(x,t)=- 2\rho_f\frac{\partial^2w}{\partial t^2}\sqrt{x(l - x)}+\rho_fU_\infty(2x - l)\sqrt{x(l - x)}\left(\frac{\partial w}{\partial t}+U_\infty\frac{\partial w}{