Abstract:Background Blood pressure (BP) is an important modifiable cardiovascular risk factor, yet its long-term monitoring remains problematic. Wearable cuffless devices enable the capture of multiple BP measures during everyday activities and could improve BP monitoring, but little is known about their validity or acceptability. Objective This study aimed to validate a wrist-worn cuffless wearable BP device (Model T2; TMART Technologies Limited) and assess its acceptability among users and health care professionals. Methods A mixed methods study was conducted to examine the validity and comparability of a wearable cuffless BP device against ambulatory and home devices. BP was measured simultaneously over 24 hours using wearable and ambulatory devices and over 7 days using wearable and home devices. Pearson correlation coefficients compared the degree of association between the measures, and limits of agreement (LOA; Bland-Altman plots) were generated to assess measurement bias. Semistructured interviews were conducted with users and 10 health care professionals to assess acceptability, facilitators, and barriers to using the wearable device. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. Results A total of 9090 BP measurements were collected from 20 healthy volunteers (mean 20.3 years, SD 5.4; N=10 females). Mean (SD) systolic BP (SBP)/diastolic BP (DBP) measured using the ambulatory (24 hours), home (7 days), and wearable (7 days) devices were 126 (SD 10)/75 (SD 6) mm Hg, 112 (SD 10)/71 (SD 9) mm Hg and 125 (SD 4)/77 (SD 3) mm Hg, respectively. Mean (LOA) biases and precision between the wearable and ambulatory devices over 24 hours were 0.5 (−10.1 to 11.1) mm Hg for SBP and 2.24 (−17.6 to 13.1) mm Hg for DBP. The mean biases (LOA) and precision between the wearable and home device over 7 days were −12.7 (−28.7 to 3.4) mm Hg for SBP and −5.6 (−20.5 to 9.2) mm Hg for DBP. The wearable BP device was well accepted by participants who found the device easy to wear and use. Both participants and health care providers agreed that the wearable cuffless devices were easy to use and that they could be used to improve BP monitoring. Conclusions Wearable BP measures compared well against a gold-standard ambulatory device, indicating potential for this user-friendly method to augment BP management, particularly by enabling long-term monitoring that could improve treatment titration and increase understanding of users’ BP response during daily activity and stressors.

Validation of the Pangao PG-800A36 automatic wrist blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension and the British Hypertension Society protocols

Validation of the DBP-8278B Wrist-type Fully Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor in the general population according to the ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 1:2020 protocol

Validation of the validity of the new wrist-type fully automatic blood pressure monitor: DBP-2242 according to ISO 81060-2:2018+AMD 1:2020

Validation of the DBP-1333b upper-arm blood pressure monitor according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standard (ISO 81060-2:2018+Amd.1:2020)

Validation of TMB-2285-BT wrist blood pressure monitor in general population according to the ISO 81060-2:2018 + Amd.1:2020 Protocol

Validation of the RBP‐9801 oscillometric blood pressure monitor in the general population according to the association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/ International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard

Validation of the watch-type HUAWEI WATCH D oscillometric wrist blood pressure monitor in adult Chinese

Validation of noninvasive blood pressure monitoring function of EDAN elite V5 patient monitor with reference invasive measurement according to the ISO 81060-2:2018 standard

Validation of Omron HBP-1300 professional blood pressure monitor based on auscultation in children and adults

Validation of the Raycome model M2 ambulatory blood pressure monitor in the general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018)

A novel blood pressure monitoring technique by smart HUAWEI WATCH: A validation study according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2018 guidelines

Validation of two automatic sphygmomanometers according to the modified International Standardization Organization 81060-2:2018 protocol in adults with a mid-upper arm circumference of 22 centimeters or less

Validation protocols for blood pressure-measuring devices: status quo and development needs

Validation of a wearable cuff-less wristwatch-type blood pressure monitoring device

O31 VALIDATION ASSESSMENT OF A CUFF-BASED CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE DEVICE ACCORDING TO ARTERY SOCIETY RECOMMENDATIONS

Validation of the ANDON KD-595 automated upper-arm blood pressure monitor according to the universal standard

P074 STRIDE BP SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PUBLISHED VALIDATION STUDIES OF BLOOD PRESSURE MEASURING DEVICES

Validation of the Mindray VS9 Vital Signs Monitor in a combined adult and pediatric population according to ISO Standard 81060-2:2018

O20 CURRENT 24-HOUR AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE TECHNOLOGIES SHOULD BE RECONSIDERED AS THE REFERENCE STANDARD FOR VALIDATION OF CUFFLESS BLOOD PRESSURE DEVICES

An Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring System Based on the Uncalibrated Steps of the Wrist

Validation and Acceptability of a Cuffless Wrist-Worn Wearable Blood Pressure Monitoring Device Among Users and Health Care Professionals: Mixed Methods Study