Abstract:Responding to climate change and avoiding irreversible climate tipping points requires radical and drastic action by 2030. This urgency raises serious questions for energy companies, one of the world's largest emitters of greenhouse gases (GHGs), in terms of how they frame, and reframe, their response to climate change. Despite the majority of energy companies releasing ambitious statements declaring net zero carbon ambitions, this 'talk' has not been matched with sufficient urgency or substantive climate action. To unpack the disconnect between talk and action, this paper draws on the literature on framing, organisational hypocrisy, and collective moral responsibility. We conduct a longitudinal qualitative content analysis of the framing of climate change used by the ten largest European investor-owned energy companies and the actions they have taken to shift their business practices. Our findings reveal three main categories of energy companies: (i) deflecting, (ii) stagnating, and (iii) evolving. We show key differences in the relationship between framing and action over time for each category, revealing how deflecting companies have larger and persistent gaps between green talk and concrete action and how stagnating companies are delaying action despite increased green talk, while evolving companies exhibit a closer link between talk and action that tends to be realised over time. Our analysis reveals how competing approaches to framing collective moral responsibility help understand the trajectories of talk and action across the different categories of energy companies. This research makes several contributions to the literature on organisational hypocrisy and collective moral responsibility in the context of climate change. Our analysis highlights the complex relationship between collective moral responsibility, organisational hypocrisy and climate action, revealing how different collective framings—diffuse, teleological, or agential—can both enable and offset substantive climate action. The study also enriches our understanding of the performative nature of collective moral responsibility by examining its temporal dimensions and showing how an agential, backward-looking focus is associated with more meaningful climate action.

Market Strategies for Climate Change

The Drivers of Corporate Climate Change Strategies and Public Policy

Corporate Carbon Strategies in Responding to Climate Change

Stakeholder pressures and corporate climate change mitigation strategies

Intra-Sectoral Differences in Climate Change Strategies: Evidence from the Global Automotive Industry

Climate change as a corporate strategy issue

Market Mechanisms Combating Climate Change: Supply Push and Demand Creation

Climate change and business accountability, empirical evidence on the roles of environmental strategy and environmental accounting

Business adaptation strategies to climate change: a systematic review

Exploring the determinants and long-term performance outcomes of corporate carbon strategies

Climate Change Strategies of Multinational Enterprises in China

Determinants of firms' initiative and inertia in pursuing climate neutrality strategies—Theoretical explanations and empirical evidence

Corporate Carbon and Climate Accounting

Green clubs in building block climate change regimes

Corporate governance and financial performance: Reframing their relationship in the context of climate change

Green Marketing Strategies and Climate Change Awareness in Sustainable Transportation: The Case of Airline Companies

Institutional and stakeholder effects on carbon mitigation strategies

Framing Collective Moral Responsibility for Climate Change: A Longitudinal Frame Analysis of Energy Company Climate Reporting

Political Strategies to Overcome Climate Policy Obstructionism

Business strategies and carbon emissions

Reinventing climate investing: building equity portfolios for climate risk mitigation and adaptation