Abstract:Carbon dioxide emissions have accelerated since the signing of the Kyoto Protocol. This discouraging development may partly be blamed on accelerating world growth and on lags in policy instruments. However, it also raises serious question concerning whether policies to reduce CO2 emissions are as effective as generally assumed. In recent years, a considerable number of studies have identified various feedback mechanisms of climate policies that often erode, and occasionally reinforce, their effectiveness. These studies generally focus on a few feedback mechanisms at a time, without capturing the entire effect. Partial accounting of policy feedbacks is common in many climate scenarios. The IPCC, for example, only accounts for direct leakage and rebound effects. This article attempts to map the aggregate effects of different types of climate policy feedback mechanisms in a cohesive framework. Controlling feedback effects is essential if the policy measures are to make any difference on a global level. A general conclusion is that aggregate policy feedback mechanisms tend to make current climate policies much less effective than is generally assumed. In fact, various policy measures involve a definite risk of 'backfiring' and actually increasing CO2 emissions. This risk is particularly pronounced once effects of climate policies on the pace of innovation in climate technology are considered. To stand any chance of controlling carbon emissions, it is imperative that feedback mechanisms are integrated into emission scenarios, targets for emission reduction and implementation of climate policy. In many cases, this will reduce the scope for subsidies to renewable energy sources, but increase the scope for other measures such as schemes to return carbon dioxide to the ground and to mitigate emissions of greenhouse gases from wetlands and oceans. A framework that incorporates policy feedback effects necessitates rethinking the design of the national and regional emission targets. This leads us to a new way of formulating emission targets that include feedback effects, the global impact target. Once the full climate policy feedback mechanisms are accounted for, there are probably only three main routes in climate policy that stand a chance of mitigating global warming: (a) returning carbon to the ground, (b) technological leaps in zero-emission energy technology that make it profitable to leave much carbon in the ground even in Annex II countries and (c) international agreements that make it more profitable to leave carbon in the ground or in forests.

Market Mechanisms Combating Climate Change: Supply Push and Demand Creation

Construction, Implementation and Risks of the Carbon Market Mechanisms Under the Paris Agreement

Scale and Benefit of Global Carbon Markets under the 2 °C Goal: Integrated Modeling and an Effort-Sharing Platform

Exploring Global Carbon Market Link Mechanism: Efficiency Evaluation in the Context of Carbon Neutrality

Market Strategies for Climate Change

Dynamic Grouping for Climate Change Negotiation: Facilitating Cooperation and Balancing Interests through Effective Strategies

Carbon Reduction Incentives under Multi-Market Interactions: Supply Chain Vertical Cooperation Perspective

Research on the Synergy Mechanism of Multiple Subjects in Global Climate Governance: Based on the Perspective of the Evolutionary Game of Carbon Neutral Strategy Between China, the US, and the EU

Demand-side climate change mitigation: where do we stand and where do we go?

International Market Mechanism under Paris Agreement: Insights from China

Cooperative Emissions Trading Game: International Permit Market Dominated by Buyers

Green Supply Chain Management: A New Market Approach for Climate Governance

Design and impact assessment of policies to overcome oversupply in China's national carbon market

International Carbon Markets under the Paris Agreement: Basic Form and Development Prospects

Interactions and Coordination Between Carbon Emissions Trading and Other Direct Carbon Mitigation Policies in China

International Cooperation Mechanisms for Carbon Reduction

Carbon Emission Control Strategies for China: A Comparative Study with Partial and General Equilibrium Versions of the China MARKAL Model

Unilateral or Reciprocal Climate Policy? Experimental Evidence from China

Cooperative decisions of competitive supply chains considering carbon trading mechanism

Climate policy to defeat the green paradox

Study on Carbon Dioxide Reduction Schemes of Major Countries and Their Bases