Climate change as a corporate strategy issue

Trine Dahl,Kjersti Fløttum

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-08-2018-0088

2019-10-07

Corporate Communications: An International Journal

Abstract:The purpose of this paper is to explore how energy companies discursively construct climate change when integrating it into their overall business strategy.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Market Strategies for Climate Change

Ans Kolk,Jonatan Pinkse

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2004.04.011

IF: 6.11

2004-06-01

European Management Journal

Abstract:The issue of climate change has attracted increasing business attention in the past decade. Whereas companies initially aimed primarily at influencing the policy debate, corporate strategies increasingly include economic responses. Existing classifications for climate change strategies however still reflect the political, non-market components. Using empirical information from the largest multinational companies worldwide, this article examines current market responses, focusing on the drivers (threats and opportunities) and the actions being taken by companies to address climate change. It also develops a typology of climate strategies that addresses the market dimensions, covering both the aim (strategic intent) and the degree of cooperation (form of organisation). The aim turns out to be either innovation or compensation, while the organisational arrangements to reach this objective can be oriented at the company level (internal), at companies’ own supply chain (vertical) or at cooperation with other companies (competitors or companies in other sectors — horizontal). The typology can assist managers in deciding about the strategic option(s) they want to choose regarding climate change, also based on the insights offered by the paper about the current state of activities of other companies worldwide.

management,business
Climate at risk. The financial turn in corporate climate change communication

Anje Müller Gjesdal,Marita Kristiansen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/praxematique.5912

2019-12-30

Cahiers de praxématique

Abstract:The present article examines the linguistic aspects of climate change through a terminological analysis of the emerging concept of climate risk. The overall aim is to investigate emergent terminology and the evolution of the concept through a qualitative analysis of a set of international policy and think tank documents, as well as to provide an analysis of relevant Norwegian documents covering three text genres (policy documents, think tank reports, corporate annual reports). Our findings are in line with recent research that stresses the increased importance of risk in climate change communication. Our study also provides further knowledge about how the concept of climate risk has changed to include a widened risk perspective beyond that of natural disasters, including that of business risk. Next, the focus on the impact of climate change on business points to a reconceptualisation of climate change governance where responsibility is increasingly shifted from the sphere of policy makers, international organisations, and politicians to the private sector. Third, our analysis suggests that while the emergent concept of climate risk emphasises the financial risk that climate change poses to businesses, the impact on nature, the environment and humans is less visible in the texts.
Climate Change as Represented in Corporate Social Responsibility Reports of American and Chinese Energy Giants: A Critical Frame Analysis Perspective

Yang Zhang,Jingyuan Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884231208176

2023-11-12

International Journal of Business Communication

Abstract:Adopting a critical frame analysis perspective, this study investigates how American and Chinese energy giants represent and frame climate change in their corporate social responsibility reports, and reveals the respective underlying motivations and ideologies. The results show that the eight energy giants all recognized climate change, barely diagnosed its causes, slightly interpreted its impacts, but placed heavy emphasis on their solutions. They divert responsibility and criticism, through representing themselves as a victim and solver rather than a contributor. The frames identified in both corpora include Emission Management frame, Techno-optimism frame, Countermeasures frame, and Stakeholder Engagement frame, with common and distinct characteristics across the two corpora. The analysis of representations and frames exposes shared motivations such as greenwashing, legitimacy, and stakeholder engagement. However, these motivations indicate distinct ideologies, with American energy giants’ ideological denial, a subtle form of climate denialism, and Chinese energy giants’ green growth ideology, striving for a green, low-carbon development while reducing emissions.

business,communication
Corporate governance and financial performance: Reframing their relationship in the context of climate change

Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán,Nicola Raimo,Filippo Vitolla,Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2649

2023-10-25

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

Abstract:In addressing the challenges of climate change (CC), companies face the difficult task of reconciling long‐term environmental goals and short‐term financial interests. In this paper, we argue that that effective climate governance enables companies to balance both objectives, supporting a business case for CC action. For a sample of 832 multinationals for the period 2011–2020, the findings show that effective climate governance leads to higher corporate financial performance (FP) and this relationship is strengthen by better climate performance. Furthermore, effective climate governance is driven by the ownership of long‐term institutional investors, whose positive influence is reinforced by homogeneous distribution of their ownership. We provide a broad analytical framework that considers the determinants and effects of climate governance, from which theoretical and practical implications can be derived.

management,business,environmental studies
Stakeholder pressures and corporate climate change mitigation strategies

Simon Cadez,Albert Czerny,Peter Letmathe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2070

2018-05-03

Business Strategy and the Environment

Abstract:Climate change mitigation and its related reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is one of the most important challenges facing society. The major cause of the problem and the key to its solution are GHG‐intensive firms that emit vast amounts of anthropogenic GHG emissions. The study reported herein aims to increase our understanding of the climate change mitigation strategies of these firms, in particular their antecedents and effects. A comprehensive conceptual model is proposed and tested empirically based on a survey of 247 firms that participated in the European Union's Emissions Trading Scheme in the first two trading periods. We find that market pressures for reducing GHG emissions, perceived GHG‐related regulatory uncertainty and environmental strategy focus are important determinants of corporate GHG reduction strategies which, in turn, enhance GHG‐related performance. We also show that the results vary depending on the type of emissions.

management,business,environmental studies
Framing Collective Moral Responsibility for Climate Change: A Longitudinal Frame Analysis of Energy Company Climate Reporting

Feeney, Melanie,Gijselaers, Wim,Martens, Pim,Grohnert, Therese

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05801-0

IF: 6.331

2024-08-27

Journal of Business Ethics

Abstract:Responding to climate change and avoiding irreversible climate tipping points requires radical and drastic action by 2030. This urgency raises serious questions for energy companies, one of the world's largest emitters of greenhouse gases (GHGs), in terms of how they frame, and reframe, their response to climate change. Despite the majority of energy companies releasing ambitious statements declaring net zero carbon ambitions, this 'talk' has not been matched with sufficient urgency or substantive climate action. To unpack the disconnect between talk and action, this paper draws on the literature on framing, organisational hypocrisy, and collective moral responsibility. We conduct a longitudinal qualitative content analysis of the framing of climate change used by the ten largest European investor-owned energy companies and the actions they have taken to shift their business practices. Our findings reveal three main categories of energy companies: (i) deflecting, (ii) stagnating, and (iii) evolving. We show key differences in the relationship between framing and action over time for each category, revealing how deflecting companies have larger and persistent gaps between green talk and concrete action and how stagnating companies are delaying action despite increased green talk, while evolving companies exhibit a closer link between talk and action that tends to be realised over time. Our analysis reveals how competing approaches to framing collective moral responsibility help understand the trajectories of talk and action across the different categories of energy companies. This research makes several contributions to the literature on organisational hypocrisy and collective moral responsibility in the context of climate change. Our analysis highlights the complex relationship between collective moral responsibility, organisational hypocrisy and climate action, revealing how different collective framings—diffuse, teleological, or agential—can both enable and offset substantive climate action. The study also enriches our understanding of the performative nature of collective moral responsibility by examining its temporal dimensions and showing how an agential, backward-looking focus is associated with more meaningful climate action.

business,ethics
Corporate Carbon Strategies in Responding to Climate Change

Su-Yol Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.711

2011-04-28

Business Strategy and the Environment

Abstract:With climate change emerging as one of the most important issues affecting the business circle, companies have begun considering the carbon issue in their overall strategic positioning. However, few studies have examined the corporate carbon strategies in developing and advanced developing countries, where climate change regulation is extensive and market uncertainty is relatively high. In addition, there has been growing interest among researchers and practitioners concerning the relationship between the carbon strategy and firm performance. This paper presents a framework for identifying the corporate carbon strategy. The cluster analysis of 241 Korean companies indicates six types of corporate carbon strategy: ‘wait‐and‐see observer’, ‘cautious reducer’, ‘product enhancer’, ‘all‐round enhancer’, ‘emergent explorer’ and ‘all‐round explorer’. This study empirically examines whether there are differences between these carbon strategy types in terms of the sector, firm size and firm performance. The results indicate a significant relationship between a firm's carbon strategy and its sector and size but a significant relationship between the carbon strategy and firm performance is not confirmed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

management,business,environmental studies
The Drivers of Corporate Climate Change Strategies and Public Policy

Charles A. Backman,Alain Verbeke,Robert A. Schulz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315578450

2016-07-27

Abstract:Effective public policy to mitigate climate change footprints should build on data-driven analysis of firm-level strategies. This article’s conceptual approach augments the resource-based view (RBV) of the firm and identifies investments in four firm-level resource domains (Governance, Information management, Systems, and Technology [ GISTe]) to develop capabilities in climate change impact mitigation. The authors denote the resulting framework as the GISTe model, which frames their analysis and public policy recommendations. This research uses the 2008 Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) database, with high-quality information on firm-level climate change strategies for 552 companies from North America and Europe. In contrast to the widely accepted myth that European firms are performing better than North American ones, the authors find a different result. Many firms, whether European or North American, do not just “talk” about climate change impact mitigation, but actually do “walk the talk.” European firms appear to be better than their North American counterparts in “walk I,” denoting attention to governance, information management, and systems. But when it comes down to “walk II,” meaning actual Technology-related investments, North American firms’ performance is equal or superior to that of the European companies. The authors formulate public policy recommendations to accelerate firm-level, sector-level, and cluster-level implementation of climate change strategies.

business
Corporate Disclosures on Climate Change: An Empirical Analysis of FTSE All-Share British Fossil Fuel Producers

Daniel Attenborough

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-022-00246-2

IF: 1.79

2022-05-06

European Business Organization Law Review

Abstract:Although UK company law has become more sensitive to climate change problems, many open questions and issues remain about the practical utility of disclosure as a presumptive regulatory solution. This article presents and analyses unique empirical research to explore if and to what extent FTSE All-Share British fossil fuel producers are clearly and reliably: (a) integrating into their overall business risk management the 'material' risks that climate change presents to their operations; and (b) reporting the impact of their business activities on the climate and the likely consequences of any business decisions in the long term. The results show that current disclosure regulation apparently fails to secure behavioural change on the part of most companies in our sample. The article offers several explanations that provide a possible answer with validity as to why disclosure does not achieve its organising purpose of managing the risks and impacts of climate change.

law,business
Climate Change Strategies of Multinational Enterprises in China

Linan Lei,Hinrich Voss,L. Jeremy Clegg,Xiaobo Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.150

IF: 11.1

2017-01-01

Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract:The purpose of this research is to identify the decision process Chinese subsidiaries of multinational enterprises follow to develop and deploy a climate change strategy. These foreign subsidiaries have to be responsive to local institutional and economic demands as well as to the directives from their headquarters. Our findings suggests that considering and developing climate change strategies is a multi-stage process that alternates between managerial cognition and capabilities and is most effective when locally embedded. The foreign subsidiary develops its own understanding of climate change and an adequate response rather than follows headquarter directives. This allows the subsidiary to be at the adaptation forefront and, potentially, influence the global network of the multinational enterprise. The process can be stopped when cognition, capabilities or both are not developed or realised.
Exploring the determinants and long-term performance outcomes of corporate carbon strategies

Matthias Damert,Arijit Paul,Rupert J. Baumgartner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.206

IF: 11.1

2017-09-01

Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract:So far, research has insufficiently addressed the long-term effectiveness of business responses to climate change in delivering actual outcomes. The aim of this article is therefore to analyze the determinants of such strategies and their influence on firms' financial and carbon performance over time. It is argued that corporate carbon strategies have three main objectives: carbon governance, carbon reduction and carbon competitiveness. To assess the complex interactions between these strategic objectives, their determinants and outcomes, an integrative structural equation model is developed and empirically tested. Data are sourced from a global sample of 45 leading enterprises from the steel, cement and automotive sector, including some of the largest GHG emitters in the world. In order to account for the long-term impacts of strategies, the firm-level change in financial and carbon performance is calculated by comparing two different points in time, namely 2008 and 2013. The results provide empirical evidence for the positive effect of institutional and stakeholder pressure on emission reduction activities. Proof for a positive impact of carbon pressure on organizational capabilities and corporate competitiveness in the context of climate change cannot be established. Surprisingly, the results also indicate no relationship between carbon reduction activities and long-term improvements in carbon performance. However, such measures are linked to long-term financial gains. Advancements in carbon performance, in turn, are not found to be associated with economic benefits.

environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental
Does climate change exposure impact on corporate finance and energy performance? Unraveling the moderating role of CEOs' green experience

Lingli Qing,Peng Li,Abd Alwahed Dagestani,Chungwon Woo,Kaiyang Zhong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142653

IF: 11.1

2024-05-27

Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract:This study examines how firm-level exposure to climate change shapes sustainable financial and energy performance. We utilize a robust two-way fixed-effects approach to examine 2905 Chinese listed enterprises spanning 2010 to 2022. Our primary objective is to unravel the direct effects of climate change exposure (CCE) on corporate financial performance (CFP) and corporate energy performance (CEP), and to explore how CEOs' green experience moderates these effects. The findings delineate significant adverse effects on CFP and CEP stemming from CCE. Notably, augmenting CEOs' green experience can help to mitigate these effects. We also emphasize the pivotal roles of green technology innovation (GTI) and the augmentation of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance as primary conduits through which CCE influences CFP and CEP. Our study illuminates nuanced variations in these influences that are based on climate risk type, geographical regions, firm scale, and industry. These insights offer fresh theoretical perspectives and robust evidence that are crucial for tackling climate-related challenges, especially in the context of emerging economies such as China. They also provide important implications for government actions, suggesting ways to refine environmental policy at the firm level.

environmental sciences,engineering, environmental,green & sustainable science & technology
Corporate Carbon and Climate Accounting

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27718-9

2015-01-01

Abstract:This volume is devoted to management accounting approaches for analyzing business benefits and costs of climate change. It discusses future directions on carbon accounting, performance measurement and reporting as well as links between climate accounting and business processes, product and service development, supply chain innovation, economic successes and stakeholder relations. Companies are increasingly called on to contribute to combatting climate change and also face the challenges presented by climate-change related costs, risks and benefits. Risks can result from unpredictable weather conditions and government regulations, such as the EU emission trading system and new building codes. Climate change also offers numerous opportunities, such as energy efficiency innovations and carbon neutral products and production. Good management requires that carbon emissions are tracked and climate-related costs, risks and benefits are identified, measured and assessed. As such, research addressing corporate accounting frameworks and tools is of increasing importance when it comes to managing these carbon and climate-related issues.
Climate change and business accountability, empirical evidence on the roles of environmental strategy and environmental accounting

Mohammed S. Y. Omran,Mohammad N. S. Yaaqbeh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12591

2023-08-18

Abstract:This study examines the roles of environmental strategy and accounting in corporate carbon performance, as measured by the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol. A novel interaction model is developed based on legitimacy theory and natural‐resource dependence theory to capture the interaction between environmental strategy and accounting. An international sample of 3322 firms from 73 countries is used in the analysis, based on a panel data design for 17 years (2005–2022). The empirical findings reveal an overall reactive role of these environmental initiatives in relation to carbon performance. The marginal effect analysis shows that environmental accounting favourably moderates the effect of environmental strategic functions on carbon performance, indicating that the former facilitates the translation of the latter into practice. Similarly, environmental strategic initiatives improve the impact of environmental accounting information on carbon performance. The main contribution of this study stems from methodologically demonstrating how the synergy between environmental strategic initiatives and environmental information mechanisms can translate into improved carbon performance. This finding has multiple societal, practical and research implications. The interaction effect evidence can be viewed as consistent with recent trends of integrated approaches to thinking and reporting, where interrelated phenomena are integrated into operational and reporting contexts to improve efficiency. This can be of interest to policymakers, investors, corporate managers and providers of assurance services related to carbon performance.

business,ethics
A climate for change? The impacts of climate change on energy politics

Peter Newell,Richard Lane

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1508203

2018-12-28

Cambridge Review of International Affairs

Abstract:The geophysical phenomena of climate change impact on the existing organization of energy economies and their attendant politics in multiple ways—at times magnifying and at other times dampening pressures on contemporary energy systems. Climate change has been increasingly viewed as a 'threat multiplier'. However, the geophysical phenomena of climate change are socially and politically mediated by actors with uneven power, capacity and divergent interests in order to support either incumbent or alternative energy pathways. While climate change intensifies and magnifies existing tensions and contradictions in global energy politics around the simultaneous pursuit of growth, security and sustainability, it does not do so in any straightforward or unmediated way. Instead, it gives rise to new concerns in relation to the imperatives of de-carbonization and increasing the resilience of energy systems. Understanding the impact of climate change on energy systems requires taking seriously the necessary role of energy within the global political economy and the relationship between fossil fuels and capitalism. It must be analysed both directly through climate change’s impacts, and indirectly through the uses of political narratives about climate change to sometimes unsettle, and sometimes reinforce, particular energy pathways.

political science,international relations
The Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Climate Governance Disclosure

Petra F. A. Dilling,Peter Harris,Sinan Caykoylu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051962

IF: 3.9

2024-02-27

Sustainability

Abstract:This study examines the impact of corporate characteristics on climate change governance among 100 of the world's largest companies, with 1400 observations in the fiscal year 2020. We consider variables such as company location, size, profitability, female board representation, years of reporting using Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) guidelines, the inclusion of UN Global Compact and Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) information, Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI) membership, MSCI ESG ratings, and the presence of a climate transition plan, a sustainability executive, and a sustainability board committee. Applying a multi-theoretical framework, we employ correlation analysis and univariate and multiple linear regressions to assess the relationships. Our findings reveal positive correlations between climate governance and the presence of a climate transition plan, MSCI ratings, DJSI membership, and the existence of a sustainability executive. Additionally, companies located in developed countries exhibit significantly higher levels of climate change governance. These results hold across various scenarios, offering valuable insights for researchers, academics, business leaders, practitioners, and regulators. With the growing importance of climate change reporting, understanding the key contributing factors for effective climate governance is crucial for organizations seeking to address this critical issue.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
Shaping sustainability: How corporate reputation can be enhanced under climate change conditions

Junyu Pan,Ahmed Imran Hunjra,Maria Giuseppina Bruna,Shikuan Zhao,Elie Bouri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105174

IF: 9.848

2024-03-06

Finance Research Letters

Abstract:This paper examines the impact of global warming on corporate reputation. Using data on Chinese listed firms from 2012 to 2022, corporate reputation scores and ratings are constructed, and panel regressions conducted. The findings demonstrate a significantly negative impact of global warming (as measured by the average urban temperature) on corporate reputation. Firm risk-taking counteracts the negative impact of rising temperatures on corporate reputation, highlighting its ability to circumvent reputational damage under climate change. Firms located in non-resource cities, operating in non-labour-intensive industries, and boasting top environmental, social, and governance (ESG) rankings are more sensitive to the negative impact.

business, finance
Sustainable supply chain management and partner engagement to manage climate change information

Frederik Dahlmann,Jens K. Roehrich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2392

2019-10-18

Business Strategy and the Environment

Abstract:<p>Climate change poses significant new risks and challenges for businesses and their supply chains. Additionally, in many sectors, Scope 3 indirect greenhouse gas emissions resulting from the sourcing and distribution of goods and services are larger than firms' own carbon footprints. Here we study how firms engage their key stakeholders in their supply chains in obtaining, processing, and transferring relevant climate change‐related information designed to overcome information asymmetry and drive sustainable development. Grounded in organisational information‐processing theory (OIPT), we draw on data from the Carbon Disclosure Project's Climate Change Supply Chain initiative for a qualitative content analysis of a large sample of global firms. Consistent with OIPT, we find that although firms primarily engage their supply chain partners in a variety of ways to reduce information uncertainty around indirect emissions data, effectively interpreting and managing broader sustainability information equivocality becomes a growing priority. Our findings further suggest that firms engage suppliers, customers, and other supply chain partners through basic, transactional, and collaborative types of engagement. We contribute to literatures on interorganisational information processing and sustainable supply chain management by providing a more detailed understanding of how firms engage supply chain partners in the context of climate change.</p>

management,business,environmental studies
Intra-Sectoral Differences in Climate Change Strategies: Evidence from the Global Automotive Industry

Matthias Damert,Rupert J Baumgartner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1968

Abstract:Companies are increasingly challenged for action on climate change. Most studies on business responses to climate change focus on cross-sector comparisons and neglect intra-sectoral dynamics. This paper investigates the influence of supply chain position and regional affiliation on climate change strategies within a particular industry. We present a generic framework integrating both market and non-market responses to climate change. We argue that climate change strategies comprise several corporate activities that have different foci of interaction and four main objectives: governance, innovation, compensation and legitimation. Using a global sample of 116 automotive companies, we conduct a cluster analysis and identify four types of strategy. We find that the sophistication of automobile manufacturers' strategies significantly differs from that of suppliers. Regional affiliation and firm size prove to be determinants of the strategy type pursued. We cannot find evidence for a relationship between financial performance and a company's strategic approach to climate change. © 2017 The Authors. Business Strategy and the Environment published by ERP Environment and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Does corporate social responsibility help mitigate firm-level climate change risk?

Ashrafee T. Hossain,Abdullah-Al Masum

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102791

IF: 9.848

2022-03-01

Finance Research Letters

Abstract:The utility of corporate social responsibility (CSR), particularly during crisis times, has been a puzzle in the literature while climate change issues increasingly threaten corporate sustainability. Using a large sample of US firm-year observations from 2002 to 2018, we explore whether CSR provides corporate resilience against firm-level climate change risk (CCR) and find that CSR helps mitigate CCR substantially. Our regression model utilizes the firm fixed effect, and the outcome survives a battery of econometric validation tests, including a difference-in-difference test, Oster (2019), propensity score matching, entropy balancing, system GMM, and changed regression. Moreover, in the cross-sectional analyses, we find that CSR is more helpful in reducing CCR for firms with higher environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure and those located in Republican-leaning states. Overall, our findings align with CSR's value-enhancing view that establishes CSR as a buffer against CCR from the strategic and policy-making perspectives.

business, finance

Climate change as a corporate strategy issue

Market Strategies for Climate Change

Climate at risk. The financial turn in corporate climate change communication

Climate Change as Represented in Corporate Social Responsibility Reports of American and Chinese Energy Giants: A Critical Frame Analysis Perspective

Corporate governance and financial performance: Reframing their relationship in the context of climate change

Stakeholder pressures and corporate climate change mitigation strategies

Framing Collective Moral Responsibility for Climate Change: A Longitudinal Frame Analysis of Energy Company Climate Reporting

Corporate Carbon Strategies in Responding to Climate Change

The Drivers of Corporate Climate Change Strategies and Public Policy

Corporate Disclosures on Climate Change: An Empirical Analysis of FTSE All-Share British Fossil Fuel Producers

Climate Change Strategies of Multinational Enterprises in China

Exploring the determinants and long-term performance outcomes of corporate carbon strategies

Does climate change exposure impact on corporate finance and energy performance? Unraveling the moderating role of CEOs' green experience

Corporate Carbon and Climate Accounting

Climate change and business accountability, empirical evidence on the roles of environmental strategy and environmental accounting

A climate for change? The impacts of climate change on energy politics

The Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Climate Governance Disclosure

Shaping sustainability: How corporate reputation can be enhanced under climate change conditions

Sustainable supply chain management and partner engagement to manage climate change information

Intra-Sectoral Differences in Climate Change Strategies: Evidence from the Global Automotive Industry

Does corporate social responsibility help mitigate firm-level climate change risk?