Abstract:Corporate environmental and social reporting lacks the comparability across companies that is a characteristic of financial information. To address this weakness, Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM) created analytical frameworks to measure the quality and scope of reporting relating to three focus areas: climate change, water and children’s rights. By translating information published by a global set of companies into standardized data, NBIM has constructed a dataset that can be used for analyzing and comparing companies across time and within sectors. The purpose of this project is to understand the value relevance of NBIM’s dataset. First, we model the determinants of the disclosure scores and climate change performance score. Consistent with prior literature, we find that firms that are larger, higher growth, less closely held and with higher analyst coverage tend to disclose more. We find that the climate change performance score is less a function of observable firm characteristics and is more idiosyncratic. This highlights the different dynamics of measures that capture actual performance, versus metrics that capture disclosures of efforts. Next, we take the ‘residual’ scores – the part of the scores that is uncorrelated with observable firm characteristics, industry and country membership – and test for associations with future financial performance. Across all of our models, the residual disclosure score is not robustly correlated with any metric of future financial performance. However, we find that the residual component of the climate change performance score is significantly related to future financial performance. We find even stronger associations for the subset of firms that have above median exposure to climate change risks. We perform supplementary analysis to understand the motivation behind these disclosures. We find that some firms choose to disclose more because they are currently facing more problems, as measured by the level of negative media attention that the firm receives on the focal issue. We also find that firms disclosing more in the past received more negative media attention on that focal issue in the future. These results hold after controlling for factors, such as firm size, that influence both media attention and disclosure levels. This suggests that higher disclosure around an issue is not necessarily indicative of better current or future performance on the issue but in some cases, it is a signal of future bad news. Conversely, we find a negative relation between the climate change performance score and the current level of negative media attention, suggesting that this performance measure indeed captures meaningful efforts to manage climate-related risks.

Corporate Disclosures on Climate Change: An Empirical Analysis of FTSE All-Share British Fossil Fuel Producers

Corporate climate risk disclosure: assessing materiality and stakeholder expectations for sustainable value creation

Carbon disclosure and firm risk: evidence from the UK corporate responses to climate change

The Materiality of Climate Risk

Disclosure of climate risk information by the world’s largest companies

Climate Risk Disclosure and Institutional Investors: Evidence from the Insurance Industry

Accounting for Carbon Emissions Among Large U.S. Companies: Does Materiality Matter

Information Disclosure and the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy: Climate-Related Risk in the UK and France

The climate-related financial disclosure regulations 2022: A step in the right direction for ESG in the private sector

Exploring corporate disclosure on climate change: Evidence from the Greek business sector

Do climate risk disclosures matter to financial analysts?

Climate finance and disclosure for institutional investors: why transparency is not enough

Carbon Emissions and TCFD Aligned Climate-Related Information Disclosures

Corporate governance and financial performance: Reframing their relationship in the context of climate change

To Disclose or Not to Disclose Climate-Change Risk in Form 10-K: Does Materiality Lie in the Eyes of the Beholder?

When attention to climate change matters: The impact of climate risk disclosure on firm market value

Implementing the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures Recommendations: An Assessment of Corporate Readiness

The Value Relevance of Corporate Sustainability Disclosures: An Analysis of a Dataset from One Large Asset Owner

The Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Climate Governance Disclosure

Showing off cleaner hands: mandatory climate-related disclosure by financial institutions and the financing of fossil energy