Abstract:As the importance of non-state mitigation actions in the transition to a low-carbon economy becomes firmly established, a rapidly growing number of companies are setting corporate climate mitigation targets. Shareholders increasingly value these commitments, conveying the impression of good future carbon performance. However, a critical question emerges: why do some companies progress better than others toward their climate mitigation targets? There is currently a lack of empirical literature assessing companies ́ progress against their mitigation targets. Using a new indicator to evaluate the progress against individual corporate climate mitigation targets in a comparable manner, this study presents an explanatory analysis of 120 determinants applied to 4,341 climate mitigation targets (scope 1 and 2 emissions) of 2,975 companies reporting to the 2020 CDP questionnaire. The target progress assessment shows that 30% of targets have increased emissions since their base year, 15% have reduced their emissions but not at a sufficient pace, while 55% were on track to achieving or had already achieved their targets. In addition, 18% of targets were already achieved the year the target was set, which may be due to choosing a base year with unusually high emissions. The findings reveal 19 key determinants significantly associated with the progress against corporate targets and highlight future research orientation. Our results indicate better progression by companies having absolute targets with longer timeframes and disclosing additional, as well as remuneration links to climate-related issues. Companies with more ambitious targets progress less than others, except when the ambitious targets are approved by the Science-Based Targets initiative. The latter implies ambitious targets from some firms may only be symbolic, and that investors should consider both target ambition and progress. Clear guidance and regulations should be implemented by policymakers to prevent misleading target information. Future research should address limitations related to reliance on self-reported data and exclusion of scope 3 emissions targets, along with the research directions suggested by the findings.

Stakeholder pressures and corporate climate change mitigation strategies

Institutional and stakeholder effects on carbon mitigation strategies

Exploring the determinants and long-term performance outcomes of corporate carbon strategies

The Drivers of Corporate Climate Change Strategies and Public Policy

Corporate governance and financial performance: Reframing their relationship in the context of climate change

Climate change and business accountability, empirical evidence on the roles of environmental strategy and environmental accounting

Market Strategies for Climate Change

Determinants of firms' initiative and inertia in pursuing climate neutrality strategies—Theoretical explanations and empirical evidence

What drives Companies' Progress on their Emission Reduction Targets?

Your emissions or mine? Examining how emissions management strategies, ESG performance, and targets impact investor perceptions

Enhancing Environmental Sustainability: Stakeholder Pressure and Corporate CO2-Related Performance—An Examination of the Mediating and Moderating Effects of Corporate Decarbonization Strategies

Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance: The Role of Emission Reductions

Business strategies and carbon emissions

Corporate Carbon Strategies in Responding to Climate Change

Climate Change and Firm Valuation: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment

Can institutional pressures serve as an efficacious catalyst for mitigating corporate carbon emissions?

Are Corporate Carbon Management Practices Reducing Corporate Carbon Emissions?

Corporate governance and carbon performance: role of carbon strategy and awareness of climate risk

Corporate Carbon and Climate Accounting

Impact of corporate social responsibility on carbon emission reduction in supply chains

Assessing the impact of environmental performance on corporate financial performance: A firm-level study of GHG emissions in Africa