Abstract:Background Glenoid-sided lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) decreases bony impingement and improves rotational range of motion, but has been theorized to increase the risk of acromial or scapular spine fractures (ASF). The purpose of this study was to assess the if glenoid-sided lateralization even up to 8 mm increases risk for stress fracture following RSA with a 135° inlay humeral component. Methods A retrospective review was performed from a multicenter prospectively collected database on patients who underwent primary RSA from 2015-2021. All RSAs were performed with a 135° inlay humeral component. Varying amounts of glenoid lateralization were used from 0 to 8 mm. Preoperative radiographs were reviewed for the presence of acromial thinning, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), and inclination. Postoperative implant position (distalization, lateralization, and inclination) as well as the presence of ASF were evaluated on minimum 1-year postoperative radiographs. Regression analyses was performed on component and clinical variables to assess for factors predictive of ASF. Results Acromial or scapular spine fractures were identified in 26 out of 470 shoulders (5.5%). Glenoid-sided lateralization was not associated with ASF risk ( p = 0. 890). Furthermore, the incidence of fracture did not vary based on glenoid-sided lateralization (0-2mm - 7.4%, 4mm - 5.6%, 6mm - 4.4%, 8mm - 6.0%; p > .05 for all comparisons ). RSA on the dominant extremity was predictive of fracture (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.20-5.75 p = 0.037 ), but there was no relationship between patient age, sex, preoperative acromial thinning, or diagnosis and risk of fracture. While there was no difference in mean postoperative AHD between groups ( p = .443) , the pre- to postoperative delta AHD was higher in the stress fracture group (2.0 ± 0.7 cm vs. 1.7 ± 0.7 cm; p = 0.015) . For every centimeter increase in delta AHD, there was a 121% increased risk for fracture (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.33-3.68; p = 0.012) Additionally, for 1 mm increase in inferior glenosphere overhang, there was a 19% increase in fracture risk ( p = 0.025) . Conclusion Up to 8 mm of glenoid-sided metallic lateralization does not appear to increase the risk of ASF when combined with a 135° inlay humeral implant. Humeral distalization increases the risk of ASF, particularly when there is a larger change between pre- and postoperative AHD or higher inferior glenosphere overhang. In cases of pronounced preoperative superior humeral migration, it may be a consideration to avoid excessive postoperative distalization, but minimizing bony impingement via glenoid-sided lateralization appears to be safe.

A reduced scapulo-humeral angle contributes to the development of scapular notching in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Impact of scapular notching on glenoid fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an in vitro and finite element study

Scapular Notching on Kinematic Simulated Range of Motion After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Not the Result of Impingement in Adduction

Modified notching classification in inverted-bearing and conventional-bearing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Relationship between the prosthesis scapular neck angle and clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Mitigating Fracture of the Acromion and Scapular Spine After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

The risk of postoperative scapular spine fracture following reverse shoulder arthroplasty is increased with an onlay humeral stem

Scapulothoracic orientation has a significant influence on the clinical outcome after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Impact of humeral and glenoid component variations on range of motion in reverse geometry total shoulder arthroplasty: a standardized computer model study

Assessing the efficacy: mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes of the comprehensive short stem system in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Mitigating the Risk of Instability After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Critical Analysis Review of Patient and Surgical Factors

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Biomechanics and Indications

Stemless reverse shoulder arthroplasty neck shaft angle influences humeral component time-zero fixation and survivorship: a cadaveric biomechanical assessment

Bone Density Changes at the Origin of the Deltoid Muscle following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Robert H. Cofield, MD, Award for Best Oral Presentation 2023: Up to 8mm of Glenoid-Sided Lateralization Does Not Increase the Risk of Acromial or Scapular Spine Stress Fracture Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty With a 135° Inlay Humeral Component

Humeral position after reverse shoulder arthroplasty as measured by lateralization and distalization angles and association with acromial stress fracture; a case-control study

A machine learning analysis of patient and imaging factors associated with achieving clinically substantial outcome improvements following total shoulder arthroplasty: Implications for selecting anatomic or reverse prostheses

Greater distance from the glenosphere center to the acromion reduces risk of acromial impingement in semi-inlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Aseptic glenoid baseplate loosening after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with a single prosthesis

Varus-valgus Alignment of Humeral Short Stem in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Does It Really Matter?

Head-Shaft Angle Influences Isometric Shoulder Strength Levels after Intramedullary Nailing of Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Pilot Study