Abstract:Background Glenoid-sided lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) decreases bony impingement and improves rotational range of motion, but has been theorized to increase the risk of acromial or scapular spine fractures (ASF). The purpose of this study was to assess the if glenoid-sided lateralization even up to 8 mm increases risk for stress fracture following RSA with a 135° inlay humeral component. Methods A retrospective review was performed from a multicenter prospectively collected database on patients who underwent primary RSA from 2015-2021. All RSAs were performed with a 135° inlay humeral component. Varying amounts of glenoid lateralization were used from 0 to 8 mm. Preoperative radiographs were reviewed for the presence of acromial thinning, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), and inclination. Postoperative implant position (distalization, lateralization, and inclination) as well as the presence of ASF were evaluated on minimum 1-year postoperative radiographs. Regression analyses was performed on component and clinical variables to assess for factors predictive of ASF. Results Acromial or scapular spine fractures were identified in 26 out of 470 shoulders (5.5%). Glenoid-sided lateralization was not associated with ASF risk ( p = 0. 890). Furthermore, the incidence of fracture did not vary based on glenoid-sided lateralization (0-2mm - 7.4%, 4mm - 5.6%, 6mm - 4.4%, 8mm - 6.0%; p > .05 for all comparisons ). RSA on the dominant extremity was predictive of fracture (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.20-5.75 p = 0.037 ), but there was no relationship between patient age, sex, preoperative acromial thinning, or diagnosis and risk of fracture. While there was no difference in mean postoperative AHD between groups ( p = .443) , the pre- to postoperative delta AHD was higher in the stress fracture group (2.0 ± 0.7 cm vs. 1.7 ± 0.7 cm; p = 0.015) . For every centimeter increase in delta AHD, there was a 121% increased risk for fracture (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.33-3.68; p = 0.012) Additionally, for 1 mm increase in inferior glenosphere overhang, there was a 19% increase in fracture risk ( p = 0.025) . Conclusion Up to 8 mm of glenoid-sided metallic lateralization does not appear to increase the risk of ASF when combined with a 135° inlay humeral implant. Humeral distalization increases the risk of ASF, particularly when there is a larger change between pre- and postoperative AHD or higher inferior glenosphere overhang. In cases of pronounced preoperative superior humeral migration, it may be a consideration to avoid excessive postoperative distalization, but minimizing bony impingement via glenoid-sided lateralization appears to be safe.

Mitigating the Risk of Instability After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Critical Analysis Review of Patient and Surgical Factors

Mitigating Fracture of the Acromion and Scapular Spine After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Position of the Prosthesis and the Incidence of Dislocation Following Total Hip Replacement

Management of glenoid bone loss with impaction and structural bone grafting in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Use of a Novel Reverse Hip Replacement System to Address Dislocation and Instability

Influence of rotator cuff integrity on loading and kinematics before and after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Instability after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective review of thirty one cases

Robert H. Cofield, MD, Award for Best Oral Presentation 2023: Up to 8mm of Glenoid-Sided Lateralization Does Not Increase the Risk of Acromial or Scapular Spine Stress Fracture Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty With a 135° Inlay Humeral Component

The risk of postoperative scapular spine fracture following reverse shoulder arthroplasty is increased with an onlay humeral stem

Optimizing stability and motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° neck-shaft-angle: a computer model study of standard versus retentive humeral inserts

Controversies in surgical management of anterior shoulder instability. State of the Art

Arthroscopic Management of Posterior Shoulder Instability

Modification of Humeral Component Results in Increased Impingement Free Range of Motion in a Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Model

The Evolution of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty—From the First Steps to Novel Implant Designs and Surgical Techniques

Decreased Instability in High-Risk (Hip-Spine 2B) Patients After Modifications of Surgical Planning and Technique

Aseptic glenoid baseplate loosening after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with a single prosthesis

Muscle and Joint Function After Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using a Modular Shoulder Prosthesis

Maximizing Muscle Function in Cuff-Deficient Shoulders: A Rehabilitation Proposal for Reverse Arthroplasty

Varus-valgus Alignment of Humeral Short Stem in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Does It Really Matter?