Abstract:Introduction Humeral-sided complications account for up to 21% of all revision Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (RTSA) surgeries. 1 Stress shielding with large bulky stems can lead to proximal bone resorption per Wolff's law, complicating further surgeries. 14,28 Previously published studies suggest that lowering the metaphyseal implant fill ratio can lead to fewer adaptive radiographic changes and decreased bone resorption. 25,26,29 Inspired by these studies, cementless primary RTSA implantation technique with humeral matchstick autografts was proposed to augment cementless humeral constructs, foster the use of a smaller size stem, and create primary stability of the humeral implant even in osteoporotic or in-between size medullary canals. In this study, retrospective review of this cementless RTSA technique with short term radiographic evaluation was performed. Methods Forty-six nonconsecutive patients underwent primary RTSA with a short-stem cementless prosthesis (Stryker Ascend Flex, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) augmented by matchstick bone grafting from January to July 2020. Patient demographics were recorded, and follow-up x-rays were retrospectively reviewed to assess metaphyseal fill ratios and incidence of stress shielding at minimum 1-year follow-up. Discrepancies between templated and final stem sizes were recorded, along with all intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results Of the 46 patients originally identified, there were 5 men and 41 women with a mean age of 71 years (SD ± 7, range 53-88). Mean templated stem size was 4 (SD ± 2, range 1-8), while mean final implant size was 2 (SD ± 1, Range 1-3). Mean fill ratios were 0.76 (SD ± 0.06, range 0.54-0.89) along the metaphysis and 0.67 (SD ± 0.09, range 0.49-0.83) along the diaphysis. There were no intraoperative humeral fractures from implantation. All patients were available for radiographic follow-up with a mean of 19 months (SD ± 8, range 12-40). There were three cases (7%) of proximal humeral stress shielding, with average fill ratios of 0.857 and 0.807 in the metaphysis and diaphysis, respectively. There were 3 patients (7%) who underwent revision surgeries for baseplate failure and periprosthetic humeral fracture. There were no cases of early humeral loosening. Discussion Matchstick autograft humeral augmentation is a simple, promising surgical technique with low intraoperative complication rates and good short-term radiographic outcomes. When the implant fill ratio is successfully reduced, there is possible lower risk of humeral stress shielding. The authors believe this technique can help maximize implant stability in cementless shoulder arthroplasty and preserve humeral bone stock for future revision surgeries.

Varus-valgus Alignment of Humeral Short Stem in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Does It Really Matter?

Humeral stem alignment of curved short stem in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: varus/valgus alignment is not a determinant for clinical outcomes

Humeral Component Version Has No Effect on Outcomes Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of humeral and glenoid component variations on range of motion in reverse geometry total shoulder arthroplasty: a standardized computer model study

Does computerized CT-based 3D planning of the humeral head cut help to restore the anatomy of the proximal humerus after stemless total shoulder arthroplasty?

Modification of Humeral Component Results in Increased Impingement Free Range of Motion in a Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Model

Optimizing stability and motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° neck-shaft-angle: a computer model study of standard versus retentive humeral inserts

Ipsilateral Varus Knee Alignment Correlates with Increased Femoral Stem Anteversion in Primary Total HIP Arthroplasty

The association between the sagittal femoral stem alignment and the resulting femoral head centre in total hip arthroplasty

Is preoperative planning reliable for predicting postoperative clinical differences in range of motion between two stem designs in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Isolated humeral distalization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biorobotic shoulder simulator study

Stemless reverse shoulder arthroplasty neck shaft angle influences humeral component time-zero fixation and survivorship: a cadaveric biomechanical assessment

Assessing the efficacy: mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes of the comprehensive short stem system in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Finite element analysis part 1 of 2: Influence of short stem implant polyethylene configuration on glenohumeral joint biomechanics

Preoperative Planning for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Does the Clinical Range of Motion Match the Planned 3D Humeral Displacement?

Effect of Individual Distal Femoral Valgus Resection in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Patients with Valgus Knee: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Avoid Crossing Over From Varus to Valgus

Influence of humeral position of the Affinis short® stemless shoulder arthroplasty system on long-term survival and clinical outcome

Finite element analysis part 2 of 2: Glenohumeral bone stress distribution depends on implant configuration for anatomic and reverse stemless shoulder implants

Effects of preoperative valgus deformity in patients undergoing neutrally aligned total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study with a minimum five-year follow-up

Cementless Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Implantation With Humeral Matchstick Autograft Augmentation: Early Radiographic Outcomes