Brooding duration does not depend on cat predation risk but is related to weather and phenology in the wandering albatross (Diomedea exulans)

Charlotte Bourgoin,Christophe Barbraud,Tobie Getti,Karine Delord,Frédéric Angelier,Aymeric Bodin,Pierrick Blanchard
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70174
IF: 3.167
2024-09-02
Ecology and Evolution
Abstract:In many species, parents take care of their offspring after birth or hatching and face a trade‐off between the costs and benefits associated with the duration of this "guarding period". Here, we investigated brooding duration variability in a colony of wandering albatrosses experimentally divided into zones with and without feral cat control, a novel predator of albatross chicks in Kerguelen. We report no effect of predation risk on brooding duration but the probability for a parent to end brooding decreased with forthcoming unfavorable weather, and late‐hatched chicks were less brooded. We also show a positive association between brooding duration and chick size, and between the frequency of shifts between parents and chick size. We discuss these results in light of our system specificities and of pre‐existing hypotheses on costs and benefits associated with brooding duration experienced by chicks and parents. Parental investment increases offspring fitness at the expense of the parent's ability to invest in other offspring. In many animal species, parents guard their offspring after birth. The parental decision over the duration of this period is expected to be triggered by the associated fitness costs and benefits for both offspring and parents. Here, we evaluated the relevance of several intrinsic and environmental variables in determining brooding period duration in the wandering albatross (Diomedea exulans) and questioned whether brooding duration was related to chick subsequent survival and biometry prior to fledging. We used a semi‐experimental design to increase the variance in cat abundance, a recent predator of albatross chicks, and predicted that an increased predation risk at the nest scale would trigger longer chick brooding and thus, protection. In addition, we questioned the influence of weather conditions, hatching date, and characteristics of chicks (sex and biometry) and parents (sex and age) on brooding duration. We report no effect of predation risk or parental characteristics on brooding duration. However, the probability for a parent to end brooding decreased with forthcoming unfavorable weather. Our data also revealed reduced brooding duration for late‐hatched chicks and a positive association between brooding duration and chick structural size, and between the frequency of shifts between parents and chick structural size. Finally, brooding duration was not associated with chick survival or with chick biometry prior to fledging. We discuss these results in light of pre‐existing hypotheses on fitness costs and benefits associated with brooding duration for chicks and parents.
ecology,evolutionary biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?