Why do avian responses to change in Arctic green‐up vary?
Eveling A. Tavera,David B. Lank,David C. Douglas,Brett K. Sandercock,Richard B. Lanctot,Niels M. Schmidt,Jeroen Reneerkens,David H. Ward,Joël Bêty,Eunbi Kwon,Nicolas Lecomte,Cheri Gratto‐Trevor,Paul A. Smith,Willow B. English,Sarah T. Saalfeld,Stephen C. Brown,H. River Gates,Erica Nol,Joseph R. Liebezeit,Rebecca L. McGuire,Laura McKinnon,Steve Kendall,Martin Robards,Megan Boldenow,David C. Payer,Jennie Rausch,Diana V. Solovyeva,Jordyn A. Stalwick,Kirsty E. B. Gurney
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17335
IF: 11.6
2024-05-22
Global Change Biology
Abstract:Global climate change has altered the timing of seasonal events for many animals, including northern‐nesting birds, but it is not clear why in some species, changes in timing of nesting match variation in climate more closely than in others. We tested to see if differences in the species' ecology might help explain these differences. Adjustments to timing of nesting were most closely matched to climate variation in species migrating over long distances, which may help them adapt to climate change. Global climate change has altered the timing of seasonal events (i.e., phenology) for a diverse range of biota. Within and among species, however, the degree to which alterations in phenology match climate variability differ substantially. To better understand factors driving these differences, we evaluated variation in timing of nesting of eight Arctic‐breeding shorebird species at 18 sites over a 23‐year period. We used the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index as a proxy to determine the start of spring (SOS) growing season and quantified relationships between SOS and nest initiation dates as a measure of phenological responsiveness. Among species, we tested four life history traits (migration distance, seasonal timing of breeding, female body mass, expected female reproductive effort) as species‐level predictors of responsiveness. For one species (Semipalmated Sandpiper), we also evaluated whether responsiveness varied across sites. Although no species in our study completely tracked annual variation in SOS, phenological responses were strongest for Western Sandpipers, Pectoral Sandpipers, and Red Phalaropes. Migration distance was the strongest additional predictor of responsiveness, with longer‐distance migrant species generally tracking variation in SOS more closely than species that migrate shorter distances. Semipalmated Sandpipers are a widely distributed species, but adjustments in timing of nesting relative to variability in SOS did not vary across sites, suggesting that different breeding populations of this species were equally responsive to climate cues despite differing migration strategies. Our results unexpectedly show that long‐distance migrants are more sensitive to local environmental conditions, which may help them to adapt to ongoing changes in climate.
environmental sciences,biodiversity conservation,ecology