Liberalism against itself

Samuel Moyn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15104

IF: 6.499

2024-01-30

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract:The task for liberals in our time is to imagine a form of liberalism that is altogether original. If they don't, it does not seem likely that they will see their creed survive—and anyway, survival is not good enough.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Why Liberalism Persists: The Neglected Life of the Law in the Story of Liberalism's Decline

Kenneth Townsend

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3544187

2020-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:The liberal consensus surrounding individual rights, rule of law, and tolerance for diversity that once characterized the American legal and political order is in peril. According to an ascendant, “post-fusionist” conservative critique, liberalism’s demise is the inevitable result of a failed philosophical system that fundamentally misunderstands the communal and teleological nature of meaning-making and identity formation. Sharing blame for liberalism’s downfall, according to post-fusionists, are both the right’s liberalism of individualism and the left’s liberalism of diversity. American society currently faces a double-sided dilemma, according to post-fusionists: (1) liberalism’s conception of the person has undermined meaning-making in traditional, natural (private) loci while (2) also leaving little, if any, space for considerations of the common good or meaning-making in the public sphere. As a result, liberal citizens are alienated, and liberal societies are listless. This Essay — Why Liberalism Persists: The Neglected Life of the Law in the Story of Liberalism’s Decline — demonstrates that the practices of liberalism — law especially — are much less vulnerable to the post-fusionist critique than the theories of liberalism that post-fusionists target. Drawing examples from America’s constitutional structure, recent legislative and constitutional developments, and contemporary corporate law, I show that law supports meaning-making, virtue, and the common good by securing the conditions for the exercise of individual conscience and associational autonomy in private sphere and by supporting norms and adopting policies that guarantee equal citizenship in the public realm. Recognizing the meaning-making capacities and functions of law, I argue, better enables those invested in the future of the liberal order — whether students, law teachers, legal professionals, or simply citizens — to defend the institutions that order our world.
Liberalism in Crisis

Pendleton Herring

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/137481

1944-08-01

The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science

Abstract:Liberalism is based upon bold assumptions. It is a political doctrine built upon confidence in the rationality and good will of men. Crisis might well be treated as endemic to any theory so premised. Hence, difficulties caused by the failure of men to act in a manner consistent with such assumptions could be easily anticipated and readily dismissed. The present difficulty seems to go much deeper and to rest upon a questioning of liberal assumptions as valid guides to action. It is but a step from such pragmatic probings to a challenge of the essential philosophic value of liberalism. To lose faith today in the values of liberalism would, I think, be tragic. The liberal tradition is the strongest political heritage of western culture, and particularly of the United States and the British Commonwealth of Nations. What are the essentials of this heritage? The essentials of liberalism are familiar to us all—civil rights, the tolerance of political differences, freedom of opportunity and a career open to talents, belief in the dignity and integrity of human personality, the acceptance of diversity and of compromise. These are the elements, and to many bred in the liberal faith they are taken as universal truths.
Rethinking Liberty:On Sen's impossibility of a Paretian libertarian theorem

Su Zhenhua,Zhao Dingxin

2012-01-01

Abstract:Amartya Sen's impossibility of a Paretian libertarian theorem proves that there exist conflicts between two seemingly self-evident principles:minimum liberty principle and Pareto principle.The theorem implicates a meta-question:what is the basis of determining liberty? In order to eliminate the paradox of the theorem,some proper preferences should be formed.The rationality,liberty and right boundary of preference are generated dynamically in historical process,and are adjusted in different historical periods of social development.Understanding the theorem is of great practical value in analyzing the various right conflicts that china is faced with nowadays.
Republicanism versus liberalism: towards a pre-history

David Craig

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2022.2148324

2023-01-21

Intellectual History Review

Abstract:This essay argues that the "republicanism versus liberalism" debate that came to prominence in the 1980s was largely an artificial construction made possible by the recent genealogies of its constituent terms. The first section suggests that the idea of "early modern liberalism" took shape from the 1930s, and identifies three broad schools of thought: Marxist, democratic and classical. Despite their differences, they pioneered a stereotype of "liberalism" that was well established – especially in the United States – by the 1950s. The second section examines the so-called "republican tradition," arguing it did not acquire that identity until the early 1970s, and that earlier work excavating the "commonwealth tradition" did not intend it as an alternative to liberalism. That only came into focus as a result of Wood's work. The third section looks at elements of the debate in the 1970s, stressing the attempt to displace Locke and exploring the contribution of Pocock. He increasingly argued for the complex and interwoven nature of both "republicanism" and "liberalism," partly as a response to revisionist work on the natural law origins of liberalism. By contrast, Appleby restated the older "liberalism" and pitted it against "republicanism," thereby reinforcing the binary.
The Political Liberalism of Rawls and The Question of Justicial Ark in Pluralistic Times

Bao Limin,Cao Ruitao

2007-01-01

Abstract:Since pluralism is for several reasons becoming a real issue after the second-world war, J. Rawls has adjusted his focus about the problem of justice in his late works-Political liberalism. Thus he has grasped the new developments in the field of political philosophy, and found a new way to solve problems, such as “Tolerating plural value systems and locating the consensus about political justice”. However Rawls’s project of political liberalism has been challenged by many scholars, and there are serious inadequacies that need to be dealt with.
Conflict in Political Liberalism: Judith Shklar’s Liberalism of Fear

Katharina Kaufmann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-020-09475-z

2020-07-24

Res Publica

Abstract:Abstract Realists and non-ideal theorists currently criticise Rawlsian mainstream liberalism for its inability to address injustice and political conflict, as a result of the subordination of political philosophy to moral theory (Bernard Williams), as well as an idealising and abstract methodology (Charles W. Mills). Seeing that liberalism emerged as a theory for the protection of the individual from conflict and injustice, these criticisms aim at the very core of liberalism as a theory of the political and therefore deserve close analysis. I will defend Judith N. Shklar’s liberalism of fear as an answer to these challenges. I will argue that the liberalism of fear maintains realism’s conflictual and inherently political thrust while also integrating a perspective on injustice. I will defend the claim that in contrast to the two aforementioned criticisms, the liberalism of fear develops its own normative standard from which political arrangements can be assessed. It does so by replacing the idealising approach to political philosophy with a non-utopian methodology, which opens a negative perspective on what is to be avoided in the political sphere, and how to detect and deal with injustice. Due to this standard, it is a liberal theory that is uniquely able to meet the realist and non-ideal challenge.
Liberalism for dark times: Judith Shklar versus populist constituencies

Giunia Gatta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23801883.2020.1826083

2020-10-15

Global Intellectual History

Abstract:The ability of political institutions, actors, and theorists to understand and engage the 'populist' challenge may very well be a matter of survival for liberal democracy. Political theory has spanned the range of approaches to this challenge: from chastising, to disciplining, to glorifying. This paper aims at disentangling the economic and social grievances of many populist constituents from the nationalistic and xenophobic rhetoric that often accompanies them, and suggests that Judith Shklar's rearticulation of liberalism embraces the first while rejecting the second. I argue that three aspects of Shklar's work make her liberalism different and potentially more responsive to the pleas of populist voters. First, her approach to politics and political theory centres on experiences of injustice, humiliation, fear, and cruelty, which she sees as enabled by strong, existing asymmetries of power. Second, Shklar was extremely attentive to the affective dimension of politics. Third, she was not consumed by matters of justification, but more interested in advocating for and from the margins in order to bring about a more inclusive political agon. Yet Shklar was also critical of populist dreams of cultural homogeneity and strong leadership, resisting citizenship as a privilege to be wielded against minorities or discriminated groups.
As Principle and Method Which Make Government Legitimate and Reasonable ——The Liberalism and Neo-Liberalism in Michel Foucault’s Version

Mo Weimin

2012-01-01

Abstract:Government theory, liberalism and neo-liberalism are three important stages in modern and contemporary western history of government that investigated by Michel Foucault. As principle and method which make governmental activities legitimate and reasonable, liberalism and neo-liberalism got in Foucault’s theory the new meanings which go beyond a purely political or economic or social or cultural dimension. Although as governmental techniques, liberalism and neo-liberalism proposed that we should not be governed excessively, compared to 18th century liberalism’s "laissez-faire" in specific space controlled by the state, the neo-liberalism laid more emphasis on the intervened freedom in social system and frame of law. The relationship between state and society, freedom and intervention, labor process and labor behavior also acquired correspondingly a new interpretation in Foucault’s version. We are exploring a contemporary road of government which is suitable for our development, making state and society harmony and having legitimacy and rationality.
A Further Discussion of Luxun and Modern Liberalism

Yuan Gao

2000-01-01

Abstract:Luxun and modern liberalism of China are of the same origin.In the respect of interpretation and practice of the basic ideas of liberalism Luxun is by no means inferior to any others;but Luxun did not simply advocate or practise the ideology of the western liberalism;what he thought more is how to effectively affect the reality and culture of China and how to make liberalism rooted in the inner minds of the Chinese People.He did not discuss the ideololgy of liberalism in an abstract way and laterally transplant the ideas of the western liberalism;instead,he investigated concretly how to arouse the consciousness of the Chinese people and how to establish liberal thinking of liberalism and a creative mode which is in agreement with the ideology of liberalism.Luxun depended mainly upon his own literature to carry out his liberal thinking and creation,his relation with liberalism being an interesting case of that between literature and the mode of consciousness.In various different periods he raised his doubts or criticisms about liberalism and its advocators,which did not mean that he had any doubts about the basic reasoning of liberalism but that,starting from the reality of China,he reminded people of paying attention to likely disruption and deviation of liberalism itself.Finally,Luxun and the followers of modern liberalism all shared enjoying paying attention to personal spirit and undertaking the Chinese traditional spiritual resources,It is just by means of liberalism that the tradition and the modern times can be really channelled between the person of Luxun and other intellectuals.
From the Liberty of the Ancients to the Liberty of the Moderns——A Reexamination of Benjamin Constant's Theory of Liberty

HAN Weihua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8662.2010.02.003

2010-01-01

Abstract:The quarrel between the liberty of the ancients and that of the moderns was a popular topic from the Age of Enlightenment to the French Revolution.Based on the previous liberal theories and the Post-Revolutionary political experiences,Benjamin Constant created his distinctive idea of modern liberty.Thanks to the newly discovered Constant's early manuscripts,we can now better understand his most famous political work The Liberty of the Ancients Compared -with That of the Moderns. The originality of Constant's theory lies in his efforts to combine the ideas of the liberty of the Ancients with that of the Moderns.Far from renouncing one of them to obtain the other,he tried to integrate the two sometimes contradictory ideals of the liberties,and to create a modern liberal democratic regime.
A Reflection on the Clash between A.Bloom and J.Rawls——On the Challenge of Strauss School to Modernity Scholarship

Bao Li-min

2009-01-01

Abstract:Classic political philosophy represented by Leo Strauss and his disciples has received more and more attention in the West and China.Straussian critique of modernity and its scholarship was responded variously by different people.Allan Bloom,one of Strauss' followers,showed the focus of debate between classic politics and contemporary political philosophy in his critique of Rawls.With the help of fiction of Platonic Dialogue entitled Rawls,this article put forward an analytical model Politics of the Strong/Poli-tics of the Weak to locate the merits and defects of both sides.
A Brief History of Cold War Liberalism

Daniel Bessner,Michael Brenes,Michael Franczak,Daniel BessnerMichael BrenesMichael Franczaka University of Washingtonb Yale Universityc University of Pennsylvania

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2024.2310155

IF: 0.746

2024-03-06

Cold War History

Abstract:In recent years, a flurry of books that explore the history and theory of liberalism have appeared. Nevertheless, there has been surprisingly little scholarship examining the history of 'Cold War liberalism' — one of the most important instantiations of twentieth-century liberalism — as a phenomenon in and of itself, and the work that has been done has mostly focused on a small coterie of American and Western European intellectuals. This essay is a first step attempt to articulate a broader history of Cold War liberalism, tracing the ideology's origins and influence from the 1910s until the 1980s. We focus on three distinct elements of the history of Cold War liberalism: its embrace of anti-democratic politics and how this informed the creation of the national security state; its linking of reform to the imperatives of national security; and its decline and transformation in the 1970s and 1980s.

history
Raymond Aron: Philosopher of Liberties

Steven B. Smith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-023-00903-3

2023-09-20

Society

Abstract:The name of Raymond Aron is often strangely missing from the canon of the twentieth-century's great philosophers. He is sometimes thought of as a "Cold War intellectual," but not as a philosopher of the first rank. This would be a mistake. Aron helped to articulate a distinctively French style of liberal political theory. Unlike Anglophone liberalism that has been a doctrine of rights, Aron's exemplified a certain ideal of human character—rational, skeptical, open-minded—that defines liberalism at its best. His heroes were Montesquieu, Tocqueville, and Weber. Aron articulated these views when liberalism was under attack from the combination of Marxism and Existentialism that dominated the post-World War II period in France. His example will be useful today when liberalism is once more under attack from both the extreme Right and the extreme Left.

sociology,social sciences, interdisciplinary
Criticism of Isaiah Berlin's Liberalist Constitutionalism

ZHANG Guo-qing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8860.2005.01.013

2005-01-01

Abstract:The political problems Berlin tries to solve are two concepts of “negative liberty” and “positive liberty”. Berlin emphasizes the reason why in modern society negative liberty should be first protected and the reality that unlimited negative liberty can also results in ill results. He also expounds the multiple character of human value and necessity of conflict. Heritage of his liberalist constitutionalism lies in his proposal that core of political civilization is constitutional civilization, an important part of which is to devise and improve existing fundamental social systems according to the change of specific historical conditions. Key theoretical foundation or ideology for the establishment of the system will achieve the transition from monism to pluralism and the focus of the establishment will achieve the transition from maintaining systematic interests or public right to maintaining citizens' interests or personal right so as to show the direction for later generations to improve fundamental social systems.
Individualism and Market Economic: Comprehensive Introduction to the Liberalism Social Welfare Theory

Liu Ji-tong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-8402.2005.12.012

2005-01-01

Abstract:liberalism is fundamental and classical social thoughts that have profound content and diversity theory components. The spirits and liberal market system is the core theme of interrelation. In term of the thought original, the main figure, the role of state, the functions of market, the attitude to the welfare and welfare state, and the determents of welfare development and so on, The article first and comprehensive introduction the liberalism social welfare theory, so that the liberalism social welfare theory can contribution to the Chinese society in transitional.
Criticism of Educational Philosophy on Liberalism

GAO Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-1298.2011.01.005

2011-01-01

Abstract:Liberalism is core of modernity,which has deeply influenced educational value appeals of modern education.The denial of traditional educational values in liberal educational thoughts has provided neither a feasible plan for education,nor a possible route to establish justified educational value.The essence of liberalism is relativism and nihilism,which threats legitimacy of traditional education and the education for goodness.Liberalism has become a firm standpoint that challenges traditional education idea and thus influences educational practices.Furthermore,the folk base it possesses has led to a practical plan for educational value orientation.The reflection on Fan Meizhong Event not only refers to value orientation of liberalism in national politics,but also how education should face value challenge from liberalism.The pursuit of justified educational value must start from criticizing value of liberal education.Currently,it is mission of educational philosophy to criticize and reflect on liberalism
Meaning and context in political theory

Albert Weale

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885120925375

2020-05-13

European Journal of Political Theory

Abstract:The two books offer a contextual reinterpretation of Rawlsian and post-Rawlsian liberalism. Nelson’s main thesis is that debates in liberal political theory re-enact theological debates about theodicy going back to the Pelagian controversy. This claim is criticized for its historical inaccuracy. Nelson’s invocation of theodicy as a refutation of luck egalitarianism and the Rawlsian rejection of desert rest on a claim of possibility that is too weak to uphold a plausible refutation. Forrester locates Rawls’s rejection of desert in the thinking of his contemporaries. She not only shows the development of Rawls’s thought but also details its broad influence. However, her thesis that the role of economic planning in a theory of justice remained undeveloped by Rawls ignores the intrinsic difficulties of designing a system of economic planning. The persistent antinomies of grace and free will in metaphysics, and of planning and the price mechanism in economics, show the continuing relevance of meaning beyond context.
The unnoticed monism of Judith Shklar’s liberalism of fear

Allyn Fives

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453719849717

2019-05-27

Abstract:Judith Shklar’s liberalism of fear, a political and philosophical standpoint that emerges in her mature work, has ostensibly two defining characteristics. It is a sceptical approach that puts cruelty first among the vices. For that reason, it is considered to be both set apart from mainstream liberalism, in particular the liberalism of J. S. Mill and John Rawls, but also an important source of influence for political realists and nonideal theorists. However, I argue here that, in putting cruelty first among the vices, Shklar also offers a value monist approach to political thought, one that she shares with Mill and Rawls as well. Each claims to have identified the general rule for the resolution of moral conflicts, although they disagree about what that rule is. Therefore, Shklar’s mature work combines scepticism with value monism. As such, it represents a radical departure from the value pluralist (and sceptical) approach to moral conflict evident in her early work. Her commentators have not noticed either her mature monism or the move away from her earlier value pluralism, and this is explained by a tendency to see her mature work as offering simply a sceptical alternative to mainstream liberalism.
Taking Utilitarianism Seriously

Christopher Woodard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198732624.001.0001

2019-09-06

Abstract:Utilitarianism is in the ascendancy in many parts of public culture, but its stock among moral and political philosophers is low. Many philosophers believe that it is a dead end, since they believe that the objections to it are overwhelming. This book seeks to contribute to a renewal of philosophical interest in utilitarianism by arguing that the objections usually thought to defeat it do not do so. It presents a novel form of utilitarianism based on a novel account of normative reasons for action. It argues that utilitarians can explain much of the complexity of our ethical and political thought. For example, they can account for moral rights, justice, the importance of equality, the significance of legitimacy and democracy, and the nature of virtue. Adopting a more complex form of utilitarianism enables plausible replies to the most common objections. Utilitarianism need not be too demanding, nor countenance abhorrent actions. It does not ignore the separateness of persons, nor the distinctiveness of political issues. It can also give a philosophically attractive account of the characteristics of virtuous agents. It is capable of doing justice to much more of our ethical and political thought than its critics realize.
Civil Religion:A Secret Guarantee of the Modern Politics

SUN Xiang-chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0257-0289.2012.06.004

2012-01-01

Abstract:Modern political philosophy regards individuals as the basis of modern society.By social contract people are organized as a whole,but without a common faith,the society will collapse.Karl Schmitt found out this defect of liberalism through his analysis of Leviathan.Actually in the theological origin of liberalism,there was a God's guarantee of human inner life,which had fallen into oblivion in modern politics.Rousseau rebuilt such a guarantee for modern politics through his distinction between national religion and civil religion;and Tocqueville show us the great important role of traditional religions in American democracy.Thus,traditional religions could exert an influence on public life in Habermasian public sphere,just as the role which Robert Bella conceived as the civil religion should play.

Liberalism against itself

Why Liberalism Persists: The Neglected Life of the Law in the Story of Liberalism's Decline

Liberalism in Crisis

Rethinking Liberty:On Sen's impossibility of a Paretian libertarian theorem

Republicanism versus liberalism: towards a pre-history

The Political Liberalism of Rawls and The Question of Justicial Ark in Pluralistic Times

Conflict in Political Liberalism: Judith Shklar’s Liberalism of Fear

Liberalism for dark times: Judith Shklar versus populist constituencies

As Principle and Method Which Make Government Legitimate and Reasonable ——The Liberalism and Neo-Liberalism in Michel Foucault’s Version

A Further Discussion of Luxun and Modern Liberalism

From the Liberty of the Ancients to the Liberty of the Moderns——A Reexamination of Benjamin Constant's Theory of Liberty

A Reflection on the Clash between A.Bloom and J.Rawls——On the Challenge of Strauss School to Modernity Scholarship

A Brief History of Cold War Liberalism

Raymond Aron: Philosopher of Liberties

Criticism of Isaiah Berlin's Liberalist Constitutionalism

Individualism and Market Economic: Comprehensive Introduction to the Liberalism Social Welfare Theory

Criticism of Educational Philosophy on Liberalism

Meaning and context in political theory

The unnoticed monism of Judith Shklar’s liberalism of fear

Taking Utilitarianism Seriously

Civil Religion:A Secret Guarantee of the Modern Politics