Criticism of Isaiah Berlin's Liberalist Constitutionalism

ZHANG Guo-qing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8860.2005.01.013
2005-01-01
Abstract:The political problems Berlin tries to solve are two concepts of “negative liberty” and “positive liberty”. Berlin emphasizes the reason why in modern society negative liberty should be first protected and the reality that unlimited negative liberty can also results in ill results. He also expounds the multiple character of human value and necessity of conflict. Heritage of his liberalist constitutionalism lies in his proposal that core of political civilization is constitutional civilization, an important part of which is to devise and improve existing fundamental social systems according to the change of specific historical conditions. Key theoretical foundation or ideology for the establishment of the system will achieve the transition from monism to pluralism and the focus of the establishment will achieve the transition from maintaining systematic interests or public right to maintaining citizens' interests or personal right so as to show the direction for later generations to improve fundamental social systems.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?