Abstract:In this paper, I argue that we are currently witnessing the emergence of neoliberal feminism in the USA, which is most clearly articulated in two highly publicized and widely read ‘feminist manifestos’: Sheryl Sandberg's Lean In (a New York Times best-seller) and Anne-Marie Slaughter's ‘Why Women Still Can't Have It All’ (the most widely read piece in the history of the Atlantic). Concentrating on the shifting discursive registers in Lean In, I propose that the book can give us insight into the ways in which the husk of liberalism is being mobilized to spawn a neoliberal feminism as well as a new feminist subject. This feminist subject accepts full responsibility for her own well-being and self-care, which is increasingly predicated on crafting a felicitous work–family balance based on a cost-benefit calculus. I further pose the question of why neoliberalism has spawned a feminist rather than a female subject. Why, in other words, is there any need for the production of a neoliberal feminism, which draws attention to a specific kind of inequality and engenders a particularly feminist subject? While this new form of feminism can certainly be understood as yet another domain neoliberalism has colonized by producing its own variant, I suggest that it simultaneously serves a particular cultural purpose: it hollows out the potential of mainstream liberal feminism to underscore the constitutive contradictions of liberal democracy, and in this way further entrenches neoliberal rationality and an imperialist logic. Indeed, neoliberal feminism may be the latest discursive modality to (re)produce the USA as the bastion of progressive liberal democracy. Rather than deflecting internal criticism by shining the spotlight of oppressive practices onto other countries while overtly showcasing its enlightened superiority, this discursive formation actually generates its own internal critique of the USA. Yet, it simultaneously inscribes and circumscribes the permissible parameters of that very same critique.

The unnoticed monism of Judith Shklar’s liberalism of fear

Conflict in Political Liberalism: Judith Shklar’s Liberalism of Fear

What the Victims of Tyranny Owe Each Other: On Judith Shklar’s Value Monism

Liberalism for dark times: Judith Shklar versus populist constituencies

Doubt and commitment: Justice and skepticism in Judith Shklar's thought

Machiavelli and the liberalism of fear

Historical memory, democratic citizenship, and political theory: Reconstructing a historical method in Judith Shklar’s writings

Thoughts on war: The other pillar of Judith Shklar’s Global Political Theory

The Political Liberalism of Rawls and The Question of Justicial Ark in Pluralistic Times

Ugly attachments: Judith Shklar and the unattractive face of solidarity

Giving evil its due Judith Shklar’s (Ambiguous) cosmopolitan realism and world politics

A Reflection on the Clash between A.Bloom and J.Rawls——On the Challenge of Strauss School to Modernity Scholarship

Maximin Justice, Sacrifice, and the Reciprocity Argument: A Pragmatic Reassessment of the Rawls/Nozick Debate

Why Liberalism Persists: The Neglected Life of the Law in the Story of Liberalism's Decline

From Excluded Middle to Homogenization in Plumwood’s Feminist Critique of Logic

Pragmatism, Artificial Intelligence, and Posthuman Bioethics: Shusterman, Rorty, Foucault

Fear beyond danger

Between order and insurgency: Post-structuralism and the problem of justice

The Rise of Neoliberal Feminism

J. S. Mill's Liberal Principle and Unanimity

Liberalism in Crisis