Abstract:Researchers misunderstand their role in creating ethical problems when they allow dogmas to purportedly divorce scientists and scientific practices from the values that they embody. Cortina (J Bus Ethics. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04195-8">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04195-8</a>, <a href="/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04189-6#ref-CR200">2019</a>), Edwards (J Bus Ethics. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04197-6">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04197-6</a>, <a href="/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04189-6#ref-CR202">2019</a>), and Powell (J Bus Ethics. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04196-7">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04196-7</a>, <a href="/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04189-6#ref-CR206">2019</a>) help us clarify and further develop our position by responding to our critique of, and alternatives to, this misleading separation. In this rebuttal, we explore how the desire to achieve the separation of facts and values is unscientific on the very terms endorsed by its advocates—this separation is refuted by empirical observation. We show that positivists like Cortina and Edwards offer no rigorous theoretical or empirical justifications to substantiate their claims, let alone critique ours. Following Powell, we point to how classical pragmatism understands 'purpose' in scientific pursuits while also providing an alternative to the dogmas of positivism and related philosophical positions. In place of dogmatic, unscientific cries about an abstract and therefore always-unobservable 'reality,' we invite all organizational scholars to join us in shifting the discussion about quantitative research towards empirically grounded scientific inquiry. This makes the ethics of actual people and their practices central to quantitative research, including the thoughts, discourses, and behaviors of researchers who are always in particular places doing particular things. We propose that quantitative researchers can thus start to think about their research practices as a kind of work, rather than having the status of a kind of dogma. We conclude with some implications that this has for future research and education, including the relevance of research and research methods.

Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science.

The Impact of Modern and Postmodern Thinking on Psychological Counseling and Beyond

About The Qualitative Research on Counseling and Psychotherapy Studies

“Research doesn’t fit in a 50-minute hour”: The phenomenology of therapists’ involvement in research at a university counseling center

Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology.

The Positioning of Qualitative Research from the Perspective of Paradigm

Researching the “therapeutic relationship” in psychoanalysis, counselling psychology and psychotherapy—a qualitative inquiry

A Primer on Experimental and Quasi-experimental Design.

A Phenomenological Paradigm for Empirical Research in Psychiatry and Psychology: Open Questions

Ready for a paradigm shift? Part 2: introducing qualitative research methodologies and methods

Systematic case study research: A practice-oriented introduction to building an evidence base for counselling and psychotherapy

The Pragmatic Case Study Method for Creating Rigorous and Systematic, Practitioner-Friendly Research

Three steps to open science for qualitative research in psychology

Linking Paradigms and Methodologies in a Qualitative Case Study Focused On Exploring the Operation of Power in Human Actions During the Design of a New Occupational Therapy Intervention

The Three Logics of Qualitative Research: Epistemology, Ontology, and Methodology in Political Science

Exploring the Experiences of Students of Color in United States Counseling Psychology Doctoral Programs: A Qualitative Investigation

Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 2: Context, research questions and designs

The time has come for psychology to stop treating qualitative data as an embarrassing secret

Making Quantitative Research Work: From Positivist Dogma to Actual Social Scientific Inquiry

Analysis of phenomenological research trends in the field of domestic Counseling (2010-2020): ‘Korean Journal of Counseling’ and ‘The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychological’

Theory and application of research principles and philosophical underpinning for a study utilising interpretative phenomenological analysis