Conclusion: Qualitative Research in Mental Health: Reflections on Research Questions, Methods and Knowledge

Carla Willig,Maria Borcsa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65331-6_11

2021-01-01

Abstract:This chapter reflects on the use of qualitative researchQualitative research methodology in the studies described in this volume. Although all studies were concerned with the ways in which meaning is negotiated, modified or reproduced when people engage with phenomena that are relevant to mental healthMental health, they deployed a wide range of research designs including textual analysisTextual analysis (including various types of discourse analysisDiscourse analysis; linguistic interactional analysis; emotional textual analysisTextual analysis), theme-focusedTheme-focused analysis types of analysis (including grounded theory; thematic analysisThematic analysis; metasynthesisMetasynthesis), reflexive methodsReflexive methods (including autoethnographyAutoethnography; interpersonal process recallInterpersonal process recall; corporeal attunement and hauntology) as well as phenomenological approachesPhenomenological approaches. To help readers differentiate between these approaches and to clarify their purpose and rationale, we present a systematic reflection on the types of research questionResearch questions they address, the methods of data collection and analysis they utilise, the voice and style in which they present their findings, and the type of insights they can generate. We also pose the question of what makes qualitative researchQualitative research ‘research’ and argue that despite their differences, all studies were designed to increase our understanding of the social processes that underpin ‘mental healthMental health’ and to contribute to the literature in the field. The chapter concludes with a discussion of future directions and challenges for qualitative mental healthMental healthresearchQualitative mental health research.